Sudholz Bronwyn, Timperio Anna, Ridgers Nicola D, Dunstan David W, Baldock Rick, Holland Bernie, Salmon Jo
Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences.
Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
AIMS Public Health. 2016 May 11;3(2):274-287. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.2.274. eCollection 2016.
Children spend over 60% of their school day sitting; much of this occurs in the classroom. Emerging research has examined the impact of environmental interventions on classroom sitting. While this research is promising, it has predominantly focused on the primary school setting. This study examined the impact and feasibility of height-adjustable desks on time spent sitting/standing during classroom lessons in a secondary school. Traditional desks in a Melbourne secondary school classroom were replaced with 27 height-adjustable desks (intervention classroom). Forty-three adolescents (51% male; mean age 13.7 ± 1.4 years) from Grades 7, 9 and 10 wore an inclinometer and accelerometer for schooldays and completed a survey after using the desks during lessons for seven weeks. Ten teachers (50% male) completed a survey. Time spent sitting, standing, and the length of sitting bouts were compared between periods when adolescents were in the intervention classroom versus traditional classrooms (matched on teacher and subject). Compared to the traditional classroom, adolescents spent 25% less time sitting and 24% more time standing in the intervention classroom (effect size > 0.8), and had a greater frequency of short sitting bouts and fewer longer bouts. The majority of teachers (71%) and students (70%) reported wanting to continue to use the height-adjustable desks. When standing during lessons, adolescents reported working well (69%); however, a third reported difficulties paying attention (28%) and becoming distracted (36%). Few teachers reported negative influences on adolescents' ability to work (14%) and concentrate (14%). Half the adolescents reported leg, or back pain with standing. Introducing height-adjustable desks resulted in lower levels of sitting compared with traditional classrooms, was acceptable and had some adverse effects on concentration and discomfort. The study provides preliminary evidence that height-adjustable desks may help reduce prolonged sitting in school among adolescents. Future research should incorporate a control group and explore behavioural and academic outcomes.
儿童在学校一天中超过60%的时间是坐着的;其中大部分时间是在教室里。新兴研究探讨了环境干预对课堂久坐行为的影响。虽然这项研究很有前景,但主要集中在小学环境。本研究考察了中学课堂上使用可调节高度课桌对学生坐着/站立时间的影响及可行性。墨尔本一所中学教室里的传统课桌被27张可调节高度的课桌所取代(干预教室)。来自7、9和10年级的43名青少年(51%为男性;平均年龄13.7±1.4岁)在上学日佩戴倾斜度计和加速度计,并在使用这些课桌上课七周后完成一项调查。10名教师(50%为男性)完成了一项调查。比较了青少年在干预教室和传统教室(按教师和科目匹配)期间的坐着时间、站立时间以及久坐时长。与传统教室相比,青少年在干预教室的坐着时间减少了25%,站立时间增加了24%(效应量>0.8),短时间久坐的频率更高,长时间久坐的次数更少。大多数教师(71%)和学生(70%)表示希望继续使用可调节高度的课桌。上课时站立时,青少年表示状态良好(69%);然而,三分之一的人表示难以集中注意力(28%)且容易分心(36%)。很少有教师报告对青少年的学习能力(14%)和注意力集中(14%)有负面影响。一半的青少年表示站立时腿部或背部疼痛。与传统教室相比,引入可调节高度的课桌可减少久坐时间,是可以接受的,并且对注意力集中和不适感有一些不利影响。该研究提供了初步证据,表明可调节高度的课桌可能有助于减少青少年在学校长时间坐着的情况。未来的研究应纳入对照组,并探索行为和学业成果。