Suppr超能文献

倾听公众意见并满足其信息需求——将疫苗传播研究结果转化为监管指南。

Listen to the public and fulfil their information interests - translating vaccine communication research findings into guidance for regulators.

机构信息

Surveillance & Epidemiology Service, Pharmacovigilance Department, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;84(8):1696-1705. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13587. Epub 2018 May 31.

Abstract

Regulatory authorities have a crucial role in communicating about the vaccines they license. In terms of content and timing, their communication to the public is usually driven by data on quality, safety and efficacy. However, concerns over safety and vaccine hesitancy have emerged in some communities in various countries, and this demands a new approach to communication, starting with listening to the public debate. Reviewing communication research findings, coming in particular from the cognitive, decision-making and media sciences, constitutes one mechanism of listening and has led the European Union (EU) regulatory network to developing guidance about which common concerns and information needs of the public to address through proactive and prepared communication. The guidance has been welcomed by EU and international fora. The current article summarizes the recommendations and shares the underlying research findings, as well as a proof of concept that communication research can be valuable for regulators. It is critical that regulators integrate the communication process with product risk assessment in the framework of pharmacovigilance, to ensure that public concerns are addressed in the assessments and that information about evidence and uncertainty relating to safety is provided to the public and vaccination policy makers in a specific, clear and accurate manner. Additionally, information from regulatory authorities should support healthcare professionals in their communication with patients. Meeting the information interests of the public is the principal prerequisite for informed decisions as well as safe and effective use of vaccines and medicines overall. This is also fundamental for trust in the authorities' commitment to patient and population health.

摘要

监管机构在宣传其批准的疫苗方面发挥着至关重要的作用。就内容和时间而言,他们向公众传达的信息通常是基于质量、安全性和有效性数据。然而,在一些国家的社区中,出现了对安全性和疫苗犹豫的担忧,这需要一种新的沟通方式,首先要倾听公众的辩论。审查沟通研究结果,特别是来自认知、决策和媒体科学的研究结果,是一种倾听的机制,促使欧盟监管网络制定了关于通过主动和有准备的沟通来解决公众共同关注和信息需求的指导方针。该指南受到了欧盟和国际论坛的欢迎。本文总结了建议,并分享了相关的研究结果,以及一个沟通研究对监管机构有价值的概念验证。至关重要的是,监管机构将沟通过程与药物警戒框架中的产品风险评估相结合,以确保在评估中解决公众关注的问题,并以具体、清晰和准确的方式向公众和疫苗政策制定者提供有关安全性的证据和不确定性的信息。此外,监管机构的信息应支持医疗保健专业人员与患者进行沟通。满足公众的信息利益是做出明智决策以及确保疫苗和药品总体安全有效使用的主要前提。这对于公众对当局致力于患者和人群健康的信任也是至关重要的。

相似文献

2
CIOMS Guide To Vaccine Safety Communication - Executive summary.《疫苗安全沟通的 CIOMS 指南——执行摘要》。
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 14;37(3):401-408. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.082. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
6
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.

引用本文的文献

5
A public health timeline to prepare for COVID-19 vaccines in Canada.加拿大为新冠病毒疫苗做准备的公共卫生时间表。
Can J Public Health. 2020 Dec;111(6):945-952. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00423-1. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
7
Communicating Benefits from Vaccines Beyond Preventing Infectious Diseases.疫苗的益处不止于预防传染病
Infect Dis Ther. 2020 Sep;9(3):467-480. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00312-7. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

4
Vaccine trust and the limits of information.疫苗信任与信息的局限性。
Science. 2016 Sep 16;353(6305):1207-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aah6190.
6
Cognitive Obstacles to Pro-Vaccination Beliefs.对疫苗接种持支持态度的认知障碍。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov;19(11):633-636. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
7
Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants.疫苗犹豫:定义、范围及决定因素
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy - A systematic review.应对疫苗犹豫的策略——一项系统综述
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4180-90. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.040. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
9
Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial.疫苗推广中的有效信息:一项随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):e835-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2365. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
A critical review of methods to evaluate the impact of FDA regulatory actions.FDA 监管措施影响评估方法的批判性回顾。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Sep;22(9):986-94. doi: 10.1002/pds.3480. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验