• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Benchmark validation of statistical models: Application to mediation analysis of imagery and memory.统计模型的基准验证:在影像和记忆的中介分析中的应用。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):654-671. doi: 10.1037/met0000174. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
2
The measurement of the mediator and its influence on statistical mediation conclusions.中介变量的测量及其对统计中介结论的影响。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Feb;26(1):1-17. doi: 10.1037/met0000263. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models.比测量误差更糟糕:不适当潜在变量测量模型的后果。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Feb;25(1):30-45. doi: 10.1037/met0000220. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
4
Bayesian mediation analysis.贝叶斯中介分析。
Psychol Methods. 2009 Dec;14(4):301-22. doi: 10.1037/a0016972.
5
Autoregressive mediation models using composite scores and latent variables: Comparisons and recommendations.使用综合评分和潜在变量的自回归中介模型:比较与建议。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Aug;25(4):472-495. doi: 10.1037/met0000251. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
6
Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects.交叉滞后效应的效应量指南。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Apr;29(2):421-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000499. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
Reciprocal relations in categorical variables.分类变量的相互关系。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Dec;25(6):708-725. doi: 10.1037/met0000257. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
The 'paradox' of converging evidence.趋同证据的“悖论”。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Nov;126(6):865-879. doi: 10.1037/rev0000156. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
9
A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks.正则化偏相关网络教程。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):617-634. doi: 10.1037/met0000167. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
10
VAR(1) based models do not always outpredict AR(1) models in typical psychological applications.基于 VAR(1) 的模型并不总是在典型的心理应用中优于 AR(1) 模型。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):740-756. doi: 10.1037/met0000178. Epub 2018 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of psychosocial safety climate on work-family conflict and psychological health among working couples.心理社会安全氛围对双职工夫妻工作-家庭冲突及心理健康的影响。
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2024;36:e27. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2024.36.e27. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Alternative Approaches to Estimate Causal Mediated Effects in the Single-Mediator Model.单中介模型中估计因果中介效应的替代方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2024;59(3):638-639. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2310395. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
3
A sensitivity analysis for temporal bias in cross-sectional mediation.横断面中介效应中时间偏差的敏感性分析。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Dec 21. doi: 10.1037/met0000628.
4
A Unification of Mediator, Confounder, and Collider Effects.中介效应、混杂效应和共发效应的统一
Prev Sci. 2021 Nov;22(8):1185-1193. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01268-x. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
5
Estimating classification consistency of screening measures and quantifying the impact of measurement bias.估计筛查措施的分类一致性,并量化测量偏倚的影响。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Jul;33(7):596-609. doi: 10.1037/pas0000938. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Improved inference in mediation analysis: Introducing the model-based constrained optimization procedure.中介分析中的改进推断:引入基于模型的约束优化过程。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Aug;25(4):496-515. doi: 10.1037/met0000259. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
A Tutorial in Bayesian Potential Outcomes Mediation Analysis.贝叶斯潜在结果中介分析教程
Struct Equ Modeling. 2018;25(1):121-136. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1342541. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
A Statistical Method for Synthesizing Mediation Analyses Using the Product of Coefficient Approach Across Multiple Trials.一种使用跨多个试验的系数乘积法综合中介分析的统计方法。
Stat Methods Appt. 2016 Nov;25(4):565-579. doi: 10.1007/s10260-016-0354-y. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
A Tutorial in Bayesian Potential Outcomes Mediation Analysis.贝叶斯潜在结果中介分析教程
Struct Equ Modeling. 2018;25(1):121-136. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1342541. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
2
Power in Bayesian Mediation Analysis for Small Sample Research.小样本研究中贝叶斯中介分析的功效
Struct Equ Modeling. 2017;24(5):666-683. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1312407. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
Statistical properties of four effect-size measures for mediation models.中介模型中四个效应量度量的统计特性。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):285-301. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0870-1.
4
A Statistical Method for Synthesizing Mediation Analyses Using the Product of Coefficient Approach Across Multiple Trials.一种使用跨多个试验的系数乘积法综合中介分析的统计方法。
Stat Methods Appt. 2016 Nov;25(4):565-579. doi: 10.1007/s10260-016-0354-y. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
5
Pretest Measures of the Study Outcome and the Elimination of Selection Bias: Evidence from Three Within Study Comparisons.研究结果的预测试措施和选择偏差的消除:来自三项内部研究比较的证据。
Prev Sci. 2018 Apr;19(3):274-283. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0732-6.
6
The Combined Effects of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders in the Single-Mediator Model.单中介模型中测量误差和遗漏混杂因素的综合影响。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;51(5):681-697. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1224154.
7
Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science".评论“心理科学可重复性的估计”。
Science. 2016 Mar 4;351(6277):1037. doi: 10.1126/science.aad7243.
8
Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics.行为遗传学的十大重复研究发现。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan;11(1):3-23. doi: 10.1177/1745691615617439.
9
Haldane's Lungs: A Case Study in Path Analysis.霍尔丹的肺脏:路径分析的一个案例研究
Multivariate Behav Res. 1997 Jan 1;32(1):1-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_1.
10
Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015).更好的P曲线:使P曲线分析对错误、欺诈和激进的P值操纵更具稳健性,对乌尔里希和米勒(2015年)的回应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Dec;144(6):1146-52. doi: 10.1037/xge0000104.

统计模型的基准验证:在影像和记忆的中介分析中的应用。

Benchmark validation of statistical models: Application to mediation analysis of imagery and memory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.

出版信息

Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):654-671. doi: 10.1037/met0000174. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1037/met0000174
PMID:29595294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6163101/
Abstract

This article describes benchmark validation, an approach to validating a statistical model. According to benchmark validation, a valid model generates estimates and research conclusions consistent with a known substantive effect. Three types of benchmark validation-(a) benchmark value, (b) benchmark estimate, and (c) benchmark effect-are described and illustrated with examples. Benchmark validation methods are especially useful for statistical models with assumptions that are untestable or very difficult to test. Benchmark effect validation methods were applied to evaluate statistical mediation analysis in eight studies using the established effect that increasing mental imagery improves recall of words. Statistical mediation analysis led to conclusions about mediation that were consistent with established theory that increased imagery leads to increased word recall. Benchmark validation based on established substantive theory is discussed as a general way to investigate characteristics of statistical models and a complement to mathematical proof and statistical simulation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本文描述了基准验证,这是一种验证统计模型的方法。根据基准验证,有效的模型生成的估计和研究结论应该与已知的实质性效果一致。描述并举例说明了三种类型的基准验证:(a)基准值,(b)基准估计和(c)基准效应。基准验证方法对于假设不可测试或非常难以测试的统计模型特别有用。基准效应验证方法应用于使用已建立的效果(即增加心理意象可提高单词回忆)评估八项研究中的统计中介分析。统计中介分析得出的关于中介的结论与增加意象会导致增加单词回忆的既定理论一致。基于既定实质性理论的基准验证被讨论为研究统计模型特征的一种通用方法,也是对数学证明和统计模拟的补充。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。