School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Bureau of Integrated Rural Development, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Private Mail Bag, University Post Office, KNUST- Kumasi, Ghana.
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jun 1;33(5):675-696. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy020.
Cash transfers (CTs) are now high on the agenda of most governments in low- and middle-income countries. Within the field of health promotion, CTs constitute a healthy public policy initiative as they have the potential to address the social determinants of health (SDoH) and health inequalities. A systematic review was conducted to synthesise the evidence on CTs' impacts on SDoH and health inequalities in sub-Saharan Africa, and to identify the barriers and facilitators of effective CTs. Twenty-one electronic databases and the websites of 14 key organizations were searched in addition to grey literature and hand searching of selected journals for quantitative and qualitative studies on CTs' impacts on SDoH and health outcomes. Out of 182 full texts screened for eligibility, 79 reports that reported findings from 53 studies were included in the final review. The studies were undertaken within 24 CTs comprising 11 unconditional CTs (UCTs), 8 conditional CTs (CCTs) and 5 combined UCTs and CCTs. The review found that CTs can be effective in tackling structural determinants of health such as financial poverty, education, household resilience, child labour, social capital and social cohesion, civic participation, and birth registration. The review further found that CTs modify intermediate determinants such as nutrition, dietary diversity, child deprivation, sexual risk behaviours, teen pregnancy and early marriage. In conjunction with their influence on SDoH, there is moderate evidence from the review that CTs impact on health and quality of life outcomes. The review also found many factors relating to intervention design features, macro-economic stability, household dynamics and community acceptance of programs that could influence the effectiveness of CTs. The external validity of the review findings is strong as the findings are largely consistent with those from Latin America. The findings thus provide useful insights to policy makers and managers and can be used to optimise CTs to reduce health inequalities.
现金转移(CTs)现在是中低收入国家大多数政府的首要任务。在健康促进领域,CT 作为一项健康的公共政策举措,具有解决社会决定因素(SDoH)和健康不平等问题的潜力。本系统综述旨在综合评估 CT 对撒哈拉以南非洲 SDoH 和健康不平等的影响,并确定有效 CT 的障碍和促进因素。除了对定量和定性研究进行电子数据库搜索以及对 14 个关键组织的网站搜索外,还对灰色文献和选定期刊的手工搜索进行了搜索,以查找关于 CT 对 SDoH 和健康结果影响的研究。在筛选出的 182 篇全文中,有 79 篇报告从 53 项研究中报告了发现结果,被纳入最终综述。这些研究是在 24 项 CT 中进行的,其中包括 11 项无条件 CT(UCTs)、8 项条件 CT(CCTs)和 5 项 UCTs 和 CCTs 的组合。综述发现,CT 可以有效解决金融贫困、教育、家庭弹性、童工、社会资本和社会凝聚力、公民参与以及出生登记等健康结构决定因素。综述还发现,CT 改变了营养、饮食多样性、儿童贫困、性风险行为、青少年怀孕和早婚等中间决定因素。通过对 SDoH 的影响,本综述有中等证据表明 CT 对健康和生活质量结果有影响。综述还发现了许多与干预设计特征、宏观经济稳定性、家庭动态和社区对方案的接受程度有关的因素,这些因素可能影响 CT 的有效性。综述结果的外部有效性很强,因为这些结果与拉丁美洲的结果基本一致。因此,这些结果为决策者和管理者提供了有用的见解,并可用于优化 CT 以减少健康不平等。