IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019 Mar;23(2):650-659. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2018.2823763. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
The most important objective of any diabetes therapy is to maintain the blood glucose concentration within the euglycemic range, avoiding or at least mitigating critical hypo/hyperglycemic episodes. Modern continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices bear the promise of providing the patients with an increased and timely awareness of glycemic conditions as these get dangerously near to hypo/hyperglycemia. The challenge is to detect, with reasonable advance, the patterns leading to risky situations, allowing the patient to make therapeutic decisions on the basis of future (predicted) glucose concentration levels. We underline that a technically sound performance comparison of the approaches proposed in recent years has yet to be done, thus it is unclear which one is preferred. The aim of this study is to fill this gap by carrying out a comparative analysis among the most common methods for glucose event prediction. Both regression and classification algorithms have been implemented and analyzed, including static and dynamic training approaches. The dataset consists of 89 CGM time series measured in diabetic subjects for 7 subsequent days. Performance metrics, specifically defined to assess and compare the event-prediction capabilities of the methods, have been introduced and analyzed. Our numerical results show that a static training approach exhibits better performance, in particular when regression methods are considered. However, classifiers show some improvement when trained for a specific event category, such as hyperglycemia, achieving performance comparable to the regressors, with the advantage of predicting the events sooner.
任何糖尿病治疗的最重要目标都是将血糖浓度维持在正常范围内,避免或至少减轻严重的低血糖/高血糖发作。现代连续血糖监测 (CGM) 设备有望为患者提供更高和及时的血糖状况意识,因为这些状况接近低血糖/高血糖。挑战在于以合理的提前检测导致危险情况的模式,允许患者根据未来(预测)的血糖浓度水平做出治疗决策。我们强调,尚未对近年来提出的方法进行技术上合理的性能比较,因此不清楚哪种方法更受欢迎。本研究的目的是通过对最常见的血糖事件预测方法进行比较分析来填补这一空白。已经实现并分析了回归和分类算法,包括静态和动态训练方法。数据集由 89 个在糖尿病患者中测量的 CGM 时间序列组成,持续 7 天。引入并分析了专门用于评估和比较方法的事件预测能力的性能指标。我们的数值结果表明,静态训练方法表现更好,特别是在考虑回归方法时。然而,当针对特定事件类别(例如高血糖)进行训练时,分类器显示出一些改进,能够达到与回归器相当的性能,并且具有更早预测事件的优势。