Institute of Sport Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Tartu, Jakobi 5, Tartu, Estonia.
Software Technology and Applications Competence Centre, Ülikooli 2, Tartu, Estonia.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):858. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5752-7.
Modern activity trackers, including the Fitbit Zip, enable the measurement of both the step count as well as physical activity (PA) intensities. However, there is a need for field-based validation studies in a variety of populations before using trackers for research. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the validity of Fitbit Zip step count, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary minutes, in different school segments in 3rd grade students.
Third grade students (N = 147, aged 9-10 years) wore a Fitbit Zip and an ActiGraph GT3x-BT accelerometer simultaneously on a belt for five days during school hours. The number of steps, minutes of MVPA and sedentary time during class time, physical education lessons and recess were extracted from both devices using time filters, based on the information from school time tables obtained from class teachers. The validity of the Fitbit Zip in different school segments was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and Spearman's correlation.
There was a strong correlation in the number of steps in all in-school segments between the two devices (r = 0.85-0.96, P < 0.001). The Fitbit Zip overestimated the number of steps in all segments, with the greatest overestimation being present in physical education lessons (345 steps). As for PA intensities, the agreement between the two devices in physical education and recess was moderate for MVPA minutes (r = 0.56 and r = 0.72, P < 0.001, respectively) and strong for sedentary time (r = 0.85 and r = 0.87, P < 0.001, respectively). During class time, the correlation was weak for MVPA minutes (r = 0.24, P < 0.001) and moderate for sedentary time (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). For total in-school time, the correlation between the two devices was strong for steps (r = 0.98, P < 0.001), MVPA (r = 0.80, P < 0.001) and sedentary time (r = 0.94, P < 0.001).
In general, the Fitbit Zip can be considered a relatively accurate device for measuring the number of steps, MVPA and sedentary time in students in a school-setting. However, in segments where sedentary time dominates (e.g. academic classes), a research-grade accelerometer should be preferred.
现代活动追踪器,包括 Fitbit Zip,能够测量步数以及身体活动(PA)强度。然而,在将追踪器用于研究之前,需要在各种人群中进行基于现场的验证研究。因此,本研究的目的是调查 Fitbit Zip 在三年级学生不同学校阶段的计步、中高强度身体活动(MVPA)和久坐时间的准确性。
三年级学生(N=147,年龄 9-10 岁)在上课期间,每天在腰上同时佩戴 Fitbit Zip 和 ActiGraph GT3x-BT 加速度计 5 天。使用时间过滤器从两个设备中提取课堂时间、体育课和课间休息时间的步数、MVPA 分钟数和久坐时间,这些信息来自从班级老师处获得的课程时间表。使用 Bland-Altman 分析和 Spearman 相关系数评估 Fitbit Zip 在不同学校阶段的准确性。
在两个设备之间,所有在校内的时间段的步数都具有很强的相关性(r=0.85-0.96,P<0.001)。Fitbit Zip 在所有时间段都高估了步数,其中体育课的高估最大(345 步)。至于 PA 强度,两个设备在体育课和课间休息时,MVPA 分钟数的一致性为中度(r=0.56 和 r=0.72,P<0.001),在久坐时间的一致性为高度(r=0.85 和 r=0.87,P<0.001)。在上课时间,MVPA 分钟数的相关性较弱(r=0.24,P<0.001),而久坐时间的相关性为中度(r=0.57,P<0.001)。对于整个在校时间,两个设备之间的相关性很强,包括步数(r=0.98,P<0.001)、MVPA(r=0.80,P<0.001)和久坐时间(r=0.94,P<0.001)。
一般来说,Fitbit Zip 可以被认为是一种相对准确的设备,用于测量学生在校内的步数、MVPA 和久坐时间。然而,在以久坐时间为主的时间段(例如学术课),应优先选择研究级别的加速度计。