Urso Patrizia, Lorusso Rita, Marzoli Luca, Corletto Daniela, Imperiale Paolo, Pepe Annalisa, Bianchi Lorenzo
Department of Medical Physics, A.S.S.T. Valle Olona, Busto Arsizio, Italy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Sep;19(5):517-524. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12412. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
Octavius -4D is a very effective device in radiotherapy treatment quality assurance (QA), due to its simple set-up and analysis package. However, even if it is widely used, its main characteristics and criticalities were only partially investigated. Taking start from its commissioning, the aim of this work was to study the main dependencies of the device response. The outcome dependence was studied comparing results by different delivery techniques [Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, IMRT (n = 29) and RapidArc, RA (n = 15)], anatomical regions [15 head/neck, 19 pelvis and 10 pancreas] and linear accelerators [DHX (n = 14) and Trilogy (n = 30)]. Moreover, the agreement dependency on the section of the phantom was assessed. Plan evaluations obtained by 2D, 3D, and volumetric γ-index (both local and global) were also compared. Generally, high dose gradient resulted critically managed by the assembly, with a smoother effect in RA technique. Worse agreements emerged in the 2D γ-index vs those of 3D and volumetric (P < 0.001), that were instead statistically comparable in global metric (P > 0.300). Volumetric plan evaluation was coherent with the average of passing rates on the 3 phantom axes (r ≥ 0.9), but transversal section provided best agreements vs sagittal and coronal ones (P < 0.050). The three studied districts furnished comparable results (P > 0.050) while the two LINACs provided different agreements (P < 0.005). The study pointed out that the phantom transversal section better fits the planned dose distribution, so this should be accounted when a two-dimensional evaluation is needed. Moreover, the major reliability of the 3D metric with respect to the 2D one, as it better agrees with the dosimetric evaluation on the whole volume, suggests that it should be preferred in a two-dimensional evaluation. Better agreements, obtained with RA vs IMRT technique, confirm that Octavius -4D is specifically conceived for rotational delivery. Lastly, the assembly resulted sensitive to different technology.
Octavius -4D是放射治疗质量保证(QA)中一种非常有效的设备,因其设置和分析软件包简单。然而,即使它被广泛使用,其主要特性和关键问题也只是得到了部分研究。从其调试开始,这项工作的目的是研究该设备响应的主要依赖性。通过比较不同的放疗技术[调强放射治疗(IMRT,n = 29)和容积旋转调强放疗(RA,n = 15)]、解剖区域[15例头颈部、19例盆腔和10例胰腺]以及直线加速器[DHX(n = 14)和Trilogy(n = 30)]的结果,研究了结果依赖性。此外,评估了一致性对模体截面的依赖性。还比较了通过二维、三维和容积γ指数(局部和全局)获得的计划评估结果。一般来说,高剂量梯度由该组件严格管理,在RA技术中效果更平滑。二维γ指数与三维和容积γ指数相比,一致性较差(P < 0.001),而在全局指标上它们在统计学上具有可比性(P > 0.300)。容积计划评估与模体三个轴上通过率的平均值一致(r≥0.9),但横断面与矢状面和冠状面相比一致性最佳(P < 0.050)。所研究的三个区域提供了可比的结果(P > 0.050),而两台直线加速器提供了不同的一致性结果(P < 0.005)。该研究指出,模体横断面更符合计划剂量分布,因此在需要二维评估时应予以考虑。此外,三维指标相对于二维指标具有更高的可靠性,因为它与整个体积的剂量学评估更一致,这表明在二维评估中应优先选择三维指标。与IMRT技术相比,RA技术获得了更好的一致性,这证实了Octavius -4D是专门为旋转放疗设计的。最后,该组件对不同技术敏感。