• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生科学教师的能力领域——定量研究的系统评价。

Competence areas of health science teachers - A systematic review of quantitative studies.

机构信息

Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Nov;70:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.017
PMID:30170152
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the face of rapid digitalisation and ever-higher educational requirements for healthcare professionals, it is important that health science teachers possess the relevant core competences. The education of health science teachers varies internationally and there is no consensus about the minimum qualifications and experience they require.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to describe the health science teachers' competences and the factors related to it.

DESIGN

Systematic review of original quantitative studies.

DATA SOURCES

Four databases were selected from which to retrieve original studies: Cinahl (Ebsco), PubMed, Medic, Eri (ProQuest).

REVIEW METHODS

The systematic review used PICOS inclusion criteria. Original peer-reviewed quantitative studies published between 1/2007 and 1/2018 were identified. Screening was conducted by two researchers separately reading the 1885 titles, 600 abstracts, and 63 full-texts that were identified, and then agreed between them. Critical appraisal was performed using the JBI MAStARI evaluation tool. The data was extracted and then analysed narratively.

RESULTS

The core competences of health science teachers include areas of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Health science teachers evaluate their own competence as high. Only in relation to entrepreneurship and leadership knowledge was evaluated to be average. The most common factors influencing competence were teachers' title/position, healthcare experience, research activities, age, academic degree and for which type of organisation they work.

CONCLUSION

It is important to identify the core competencies required by health science teachers in order to train highly competent healthcare professionals. Based on the findings of this systematic review we suggest that teachers should be encouraged to gain university education and actively participate in research, and that younger teachers should have opportunities to practice the relevant teaching skills to build competence.

摘要

背景

面对数字化的快速发展和医疗保健专业人员不断提高的教育要求,健康科学教师拥有相关的核心能力非常重要。国际上对健康科学教师的教育存在差异,他们所需的最低资格和经验也没有达成共识。

目的

本系统评价旨在描述健康科学教师的能力及其相关因素。

设计

对原始定量研究的系统评价。

数据来源

从四个数据库中检索原始研究:CINAHL(Ebsco)、PubMed、Medic、Eri(ProQuest)。

综述方法

系统评价使用 PICOS 纳入标准。检索了 2007 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月发表的原始同行评审定量研究。两名研究人员分别阅读了 1885 个标题、600 个摘要和 63 篇全文,然后进行了讨论。使用 JBI MAStARI 评估工具进行批判性评价。提取数据并进行叙述性分析。

结果

健康科学教师的核心能力包括知识、技能和态度领域。健康科学教师对自己的能力评价很高。只有在创业和领导力知识方面,评价为平均水平。影响能力的最常见因素是教师的职称/职位、医疗保健经验、研究活动、年龄、学历和他们所在的组织类型。

结论

确定健康科学教师所需的核心能力很重要,这是为了培养高能力的医疗保健专业人员。基于本系统评价的结果,我们建议鼓励教师获得大学教育并积极参与研究,为年轻教师提供实践相关教学技能的机会,以建立能力。

相似文献

1
Competence areas of health science teachers - A systematic review of quantitative studies.卫生科学教师的能力领域——定量研究的系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Nov;70:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
2
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
7
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Training and expertise in undertaking assisted vaginal delivery (AVD): a mixed methods systematic review of practitioners views and experiences.从事辅助阴道分娩(AVD)的培训和专业知识:从业者观点和经验的混合方法系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2021 May 5;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01146-3.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Experiences of Healthcare Professionals' Competence in Digital Counselling in Healthcare Settings-A Qualitative Systematic Review.患者对医疗保健机构中医疗专业人员数字咨询能力的体验——一项定性系统评价
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Dec 9. doi: 10.1111/jan.16663.
2
Developing a model for clinical teaching with emotional intelligence.构建一个具有情商的临床教学模型。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):1404. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06349-3.
3
Psychological safety in enhancing the competence of nurse educators among early career nursing faculty in Japan: A cross-sectional study.
心理安全对提高日本初职护理教师中护士教育工作者能力的影响:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Oct 24;7:100254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100254. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Leadership styles and personal values of professors at a school of nursing.护理学院教授的领导风格和个人价值观。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Aug 26;77(5):e20230333. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0333. eCollection 2024.
5
Evidence-based healthcare competence of social- and healthcare educators: A cross-sectional study.社会与医疗教育工作者基于证据的医疗保健能力:一项横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jan;81(1):300-315. doi: 10.1111/jan.16230. Epub 2024 May 10.
6
The importance of school leaders in school health promotion. A European call for systematic integration of health in professional development.学校领导在学校健康促进中的重要性。呼吁在专业发展中系统地纳入健康因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 4;11:1297970. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1297970. eCollection 2023.
7
Supporting the nurse educator in clinical education - a qualitative evaluation of a digital educational resource DigiVIS.在临床教育中支持护理教育工作者——对数字教育资源DigiVIS的定性评估
BMC Nurs. 2023 Nov 16;22(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01599-w.
8
Nurse educator competence in four European countries-A comparative cross-sectional study.四国护士教育者能力的比较横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7848-7859. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2033. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
9
Nurse educators' professional practice attributes and its determinants.护士教育工作者的专业实践属性及其决定因素。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Aug 31;12:269. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1672_22. eCollection 2023.
10
Instruments assessing nurse educator's competence: A scoping review.评估护士教育者能力的工具:范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):1985-2002. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1479. Epub 2022 Nov 20.