• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impaired introspective accuracy in schizophrenia: an independent predictor of functional outcomes.精神分裂症患者内省准确性受损:功能结局的独立预测因素。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2019 Jan;24(1):28-39. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2018.1549985. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
Cognition, social cognition, and Self-assessment in schizophrenia: prediction of different elements of everyday functional outcomes.精神分裂症的认知、社会认知和自我评估:对日常功能结果不同元素的预测。
CNS Spectr. 2019 Feb;24(1):88-93. doi: 10.1017/S1092852918001414. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
3
Self-assessment in schizophrenia: Accuracy of evaluation of cognition and everyday functioning.精神分裂症的自我评估:认知与日常功能评估的准确性
Neuropsychology. 2015 Sep;29(5):675-82. doi: 10.1037/neu0000175. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
4
Neurocognitive and social cognitive predictors of interpersonal skill in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者人际技能的神经认知和社会认知预测因素
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Aug 30;143(2-3):167-78. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.09.005. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
5
Necessary, but not sufficient: links between neurocognition, social cognition, and metacognition in schizophrenia are moderated by disorganized symptoms.必要但不充分:精神分裂症中神经认知、社会认知和元认知之间的联系受紊乱症状调节。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Oct;159(1):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
6
Predictors of the accuracy of self assessment of everyday functioning in people with schizophrenia.预测精神分裂症患者日常功能自我评估准确性的因素。
Schizophr Res. 2012 May;137(1-3):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
7
Determinants of everyday outcomes in schizophrenia: the influences of cognitive impairment, functional capacity, and symptoms.精神分裂症日常结果的决定因素:认知障碍、功能能力和症状的影响。
Schizophr Res. 2009 Nov;115(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
8
Determinants of real-world functional performance in schizophrenia subjects: correlations with cognition, functional capacity, and symptoms.精神分裂症患者现实世界功能表现的决定因素:与认知、功能能力及症状的相关性
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;163(3):418-25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.418.
9
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
10
Prospective cohort study of the relationship between neuro-cognition, social cognition and violence in forensic patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍法医患者中神经认知、社会认知与暴力之间关系的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 10;15:155. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0548-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive insight and introspective accuracy in individuals with bipolar disorder: A scoping review.双相情感障碍患者的认知洞察力和内省准确性:一项范围综述。
Neurosci Appl. 2023 Aug 19;2:101132. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2023.101132. eCollection 2023.
2
Memory Monitoring Recognition Test (MMRT), a new measurement of stimular source monitoring: Software and comprehension.记忆监测识别测试(MMRT),一种刺激源监测的新测量方法:软件与理解
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0321991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321991. eCollection 2025.
3
Cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning in bipolar disorder: findings from the BIPLONG study.双相情感障碍中的认知能力与心理社会功能:BIPLONG研究的结果
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Mar 20;19:1479648. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1479648. eCollection 2025.
4
Persons at risk for psychosis overestimate social functioning compared to persons with major depressive disorder and community controls.与重度抑郁症患者及社区对照组相比,有精神病风险的人高估了社交功能。
J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Mar;183:296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.02.004. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Towards Enhancing Drug Development Methodology to Treat Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia and Other Neuropsychiatric Conditions: Insights From 2 Decades of Clinical Trials.致力于改进治疗与精神分裂症及其他神经精神疾病相关认知障碍的药物研发方法:二十年临床试验的见解
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Mar 14;51(2):262-273. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae151.
6
Protocol for evaluation of iTEST, a novel blended intervention to enhance introspective accuracy in psychotic disorders.评估iTEST的方案,iTEST是一种新型混合干预措施,旨在提高精神障碍患者的内省准确性。
NPP Digit Psychiatry Neurosci. 2025;3(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s44277-024-00024-7. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
7
Utilizing Technology to Enhance the Ecological Validity of Cognitive and Functional Assessments in Schizophrenia: An Overview of the State-of-the-Art.利用技术提高精神分裂症认知和功能评估的生态效度:最新进展综述
Schizophr Bull Open. 2024 Nov 28;5(1):sgae025. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae025. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Clinical subtypes of schizophrenia based on the discrepancies between objective performance on social cognition tasks and subjective difficulties in social cognition.基于社会认知任务客观表现与社会认知主观困难之间差异的精神分裂症临床亚型。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Oct 29;10(1):94. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00515-8.
9
On Metacognition: Overconfidence in Word Recall Prediction and Its Association with Psychotic Symptoms in Patients with Schizophrenia.关于元认知:精神分裂症患者在单词回忆预测中的过度自信及其与精神病症状的关联
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 29;14(9):872. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090872.
10
Relationships between Sleep Quality, Introspective Accuracy, and Confidence Differ among People with Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Bipolar Disorder with Psychotic Features.精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍和伴有精神病性特征的双相情感障碍患者的睡眠质量、内省准确性和自信之间的关系存在差异。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;14(3):192. doi: 10.3390/bs14030192.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-assessment of social cognitive ability in schizophrenia: Association with social cognitive test performance, informant assessments of social cognitive ability, and everyday outcomes.精神分裂症患者社会认知能力的自我评估:与社会认知测试表现、社会认知能力的知情者评估以及日常结果的关联。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Sep;199:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
2
Using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) to Define Different Domains of Negative Symptoms: Prediction of Everyday Functioning by Impairments in Emotional Expression and Emotional Experience.使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)定义阴性症状的不同领域:通过情感表达和情感体验障碍预测日常功能。
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec 1;14(11-12):18-22.
3
Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Final Validation Study.社会认知心理计量学评估:最终验证研究的结果。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):737-748. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx117.
4
The effectiveness of metacognitive training for patients with schizophrenia: a narrative systematic review of studies published between 2009 and 2015.元认知训练对精神分裂症患者的有效性:对2009年至2015年间发表的研究的叙述性系统评价
Psychiatr Pol. 2016;50(4):787-803. doi: 10.12740/PP/59113.
5
Self-assessment of social cognitive ability in individuals with schizophrenia: Appraising task difficulty and allocation of effort.精神分裂症患者社会认知能力的自我评估:评估任务难度与努力分配
Schizophr Res. 2017 Jan;179:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.033. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
6
Subjective versus objective cognition: Evidence for poor metacognitive monitoring in schizophrenia.主观认知与客观认知:精神分裂症中元认知监测能力差的证据。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Dec;178(1-3):74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
A Two-Factor Model Better Explains Heterogeneity in Negative Symptoms: Evidence from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.双因素模型能更好地解释阴性症状的异质性:来自阳性与阴性症状量表的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 12;7:707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00707. eCollection 2016.
8
Prevalence, Employment Rate, and Cost of Schizophrenia in a High-Income Welfare Society: A Population-Based Study Using Comprehensive Health and Welfare Registers.高收入福利社会中精神分裂症的患病率、就业率及成本:一项基于人群的研究,使用综合健康与福利登记册
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Mar;42(2):476-83. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv141. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
9
Metacognitive training for schizophrenia: a systematic review.精神分裂症的元认知训练:一项系统综述
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 25;27(3):149-57. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215065.
10
Social cognition, social competence, negative symptoms and social outcomes: Inter-relationships in people with schizophrenia.社会认知、社会能力、阴性症状与社会结局:精神分裂症患者的相互关系
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Sep;68:254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Jul 13.

精神分裂症患者内省准确性受损:功能结局的独立预测因素。

Impaired introspective accuracy in schizophrenia: an independent predictor of functional outcomes.

作者信息

Silberstein Juliet, Harvey Philip D

机构信息

a University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami , FL , USA.

b Research Service, Bruce W. Cater VA Medical Center , Miami VA Healthcare System , Miami , FL , USA.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2019 Jan;24(1):28-39. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2018.1549985. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1080/13546805.2018.1549985
PMID:30477401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6370513/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with schizophrenia present across a spectrum of symptomatology. Disability remains a debilitating reality across varying disease presentations and remains pervasive despite psychiatric medications. Cognition (neuro/social cognition) and negative symptoms have emerged as the strongest predictors of real-world disability, but account for <50% of the variance in outcomes.

METHODS

Our attempts to determine what accounts for the remaining 50% of variance has shown that poor introspective accuracy (IA) may be the most potent predictor of functional outcomes 25% of individuals with schizophrenia. We define IA as the adequacy of self-assessments of ability, skills, performance, or decisions. We suggest that IA is a progression of metacognition and can extend beyond cognition to include misestimation of prior and likely future performance in social or other adaptively relevant situations.

RESULTS

Additionally, IA is bidirectional and self-orientated. Emerging research has found that IA of neurocognitive ability better predicts everyday functional deficits than scores on performance-based measures or neurocognitive skills and has found that IA of social cognition accounts unique variance in real-world disability above social cognitive performance.

DISCUSSION

We argue that impaired IA, affecting 25-50% of patients with schizophrenia, in the absence or minimal presence of other impairments might be the most powerful predictor of functional outcomes.

摘要

引言

精神分裂症患者的症状表现具有多样性。在不同的疾病表现中,残疾仍然是一个使人衰弱的现实,并且尽管有精神科药物治疗,残疾现象仍然普遍存在。认知(神经/社会认知)和阴性症状已成为现实世界中残疾的最强预测因素,但它们在结果差异中所占比例不到50%。

方法

我们试图确定导致其余50%差异的因素,结果表明,内省准确性(IA)差可能是25%的精神分裂症患者功能结果的最有力预测因素。我们将IA定义为对能力、技能、表现或决策的自我评估的充分程度。我们认为IA是元认知的一个发展阶段,并且可以超越认知,包括对社会或其他适应性相关情境中过去和未来可能表现的错误估计。

结果

此外,IA是双向的且以自我为导向。新出现的研究发现,神经认知能力的IA比基于表现的测量得分或神经认知技能更能预测日常功能缺陷,并且发现社会认知的IA在现实世界残疾中占独特的差异,高于社会认知表现。

讨论

我们认为,在没有或极少存在其他损害的情况下,IA受损影响25%-50%的精神分裂症患者,可能是功能结果的最有力预测因素。