Suppr超能文献

词级韵律测量与言语失用症的鉴别诊断。

Word-level prosodic measures and the differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech.

作者信息

Haley Katarina L, Jacks Adam

机构信息

a Department of Allied Health Sciences , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.

出版信息

Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(5):479-495. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1550813. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Abstract

Impaired production of prosody is considered a primary diagnostic criterion for apraxia of speech. In this study, we examined diagnostic relevance for five word-level prosody measures. Seven speakers with AOS, nine with aphasia and no AOS, and 19 age-matched neurotypical controls produced nine words consisting of three or four syllables. Lexical stress indices were computed based on relative values for duration, fundamental frequency, and intensity across pairs of unstressed-stressed syllables with varying intrinsic vowel duration contrast patterns. A simple average syllable duration measure was also obtained. AOS speakers differed from the other two groups on three metrics that were solely or primarily derived from duration measures. The degree of diagnostic overlap was smallest for the syllable duration metric, which also showed the strongest inter-observer reliability and most complete overlap between neurotypical speakers and speakers with aphasia and no AOS. Vowel intrinsic durational properties affected lexical stress metrics significantly, indicating a need to select word targets purposefully. Based on these results, it appears that the average syllable duration metric is a more stable and informative alternative for differential diagnostic purposes. The results will, however, need to be replicated in a larger sample.

摘要

韵律产生受损被认为是言语失用症的主要诊断标准。在本研究中,我们考察了五项词级韵律指标的诊断相关性。七名患有言语失用症的受试者、九名患有失语症但无言语失用症的受试者以及19名年龄匹配的神经典型对照者说出了九个由三或四个音节组成的单词。词汇重音指数是根据具有不同固有元音时长对比模式的非重读音节与重读音节对之间的时长、基频和强度的相对值计算得出的。还获得了一个简单的平均音节时长指标。在仅由或主要由时长指标得出的三个指标上,言语失用症受试者与其他两组不同。音节时长指标的诊断重叠程度最小,该指标在神经典型受试者与患有失语症但无言语失用症的受试者之间也显示出最强的观察者间信度和最完全的重叠。元音固有时长特性对词汇重音指标有显著影响,这表明需要有目的地选择单词目标。基于这些结果,平均音节时长指标似乎是用于鉴别诊断目的的更稳定且更具信息量的替代指标。然而,这些结果需要在更大的样本中进行重复验证。

相似文献

1
Word-level prosodic measures and the differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(5):479-495. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1550813. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
2
Error variability and the differentiation between apraxia of speech and aphasia with phonemic paraphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Jun;56(3):891-905. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0161). Epub 2012 Dec 28.
3
Effects of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment on Sound-Level and Speech Production Errors in Individuals With Aphasia and Acquired Apraxia of Speech.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun 18;30(3S):1446-1458. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00141. Epub 2021 May 19.
4
Normative Values for Word Syllable Duration With Interpretation in a Large Sample of Stroke Survivors With Aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2480-2492. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00300. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
5
Word length and vowel duration in apraxia of speech: the use of relative measures.
Brain Lang. 2001 Dec;79(3):397-406. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2494.
6
Temporal acoustic measures distinguish primary progressive apraxia of speech from primary progressive aphasia.
Brain Lang. 2017 May;168:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
7
Speech Fluency in Acquired Apraxia of Speech During Narrative Discourse: Group Comparisons and Dual-Task Effects.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Jul 15;28(2S):905-914. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-MSC18-18-0107.
8
Three-Dimensional Speech Profiles in Stroke Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Aug 17;32(4S):1825-1834. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00170. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
9
Reliability and stability of the metrical stress effect on segmental production accuracy in persons with apraxia of speech.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Nov;54(6):902-913. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12493. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
10
Identifying segmental and prosodic errors associated with the increasing word length effect in acquired apraxia of speech.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jun;24(3):294-306. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2061593. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Acoustic Measures of Word-Level Prosody in Childhood Apraxia of Speech: An Initial Validation Study.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jul 29;34(4S):2485-2508. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00260. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
2
Refined Operational Definitions for the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jul 29;34(4S):2519-2532. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00229. Epub 2025 May 22.
3
The serial order system in word production and working memory: A case series approach.
Cortex. 2025 May;186:128-146. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.04.001. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
5
A targeted review of prosodic production in agrammatic aphasia.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2025 May;35(4):863-903. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2024.2362243. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
6
Assessment protocol for acquired apraxia of speech.
Codas. 2023 Oct 13;36(1):e20220251. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022251pt. eCollection 2023.
7
Normative Values for Word Syllable Duration With Interpretation in a Large Sample of Stroke Survivors With Aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2480-2492. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00300. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
Do People With Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia Improve or Worsen Across Repeated Sequential Word Trials?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Apr 12;66(4):1240-1251. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00438. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
9
Three-Dimensional Speech Profiles in Stroke Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Aug 17;32(4S):1825-1834. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00170. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
10
Repeated word production is inconsistent in both aphasia and apraxia of speech.
Aphasiology. 2021;35(4):518-538. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1727837. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting clinical decline in progressive agrammatic aphasia and apraxia of speech.
Neurology. 2017 Nov 28;89(22):2271-2279. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004685. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
2
Perceptually Salient Sound Distortions and Apraxia of Speech: A Performance Continuum.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Jun 22;26(2S):631-640. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0103.
3
Temporal acoustic measures distinguish primary progressive apraxia of speech from primary progressive aphasia.
Brain Lang. 2017 May;168:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
4
Still not adult-like: lexical stress contrastivity in word productions of eight- to eleven-year-olds.
J Child Lang. 2017 Sep;44(5):1274-1288. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000489. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
Speech rhythm in Kannada speaking adults who stutter.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Oct;19(5):529-537. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2016.1221459. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
6
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
A predictive model for diagnosing stroke-related apraxia of speech.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 29;81:129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
8
Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: A Systematic Review of Intervention Research Between 2004 and 2012.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May 1;24(2):316-337. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0118.
9
Primary progressive apraxia of speech: clinical features and acoustic and neurologic correlates.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):88-100. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0174.
10
Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e89864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089864. eCollection 2014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验