1The George Institute for Global Health,University of New South Wales,PO Box M201,Missenden Road,Sydney,NSW2052,Australia.
3Independent Nutrition Consultant,Suva,Fiji.
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jul;22(10):1858-1871. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003609. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Pacific Island countries are experiencing a high burden of diet-related non-communicable diseases; and consumption of fat, sugar and salt are important modifiable risk factors contributing to this. The present study systematically reviewed and summarized available literature on dietary intakes of fat, sugar and salt in the Pacific Islands.
Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and GlobalHealth) were searched from 2005 to January 2018. Grey literature was also searched and key stakeholders were consulted for additional information. Study eligibility was assessed by two authors and quality was evaluated using a modified tool for assessing dietary intake studies.
Thirty-one studies were included, twenty-two contained information on fat, seventeen on sugar and fourteen on salt. Dietary assessment methods varied widely and six different outcome measures for fat, sugar and salt intake - absolute intake, household expenditure, percentage contribution to energy intake, sources, availability and dietary behaviours - were used. Absolute intake of fat ranged from 25·4 g/d in Solomon Islands to 98·9 g/d in Guam, while salt intake ranged from 5·6 g/d in Kiribati to 10·3 g/d in Fiji. Only Guam reported on absolute sugar intake (47·3 g/d). Peer-reviewed research studies used higher-quality dietary assessment methods, while reports from national surveys had better participation rates but mostly utilized indirect methods to quantify intake.
Despite the established and growing crisis of diet-related diseases in the Pacific, there is inadequate evidence about what Pacific Islanders are eating. Pacific Island countries need nutrition monitoring systems to fully understand the changing diets of Pacific Islanders and inform effective policy interventions.
太平洋岛国面临着与饮食相关的非传染性疾病的高负担;脂肪、糖和盐的摄入是导致这一问题的重要可改变风险因素。本研究系统地回顾和总结了太平洋岛屿地区饮食中脂肪、糖和盐摄入量的现有文献。
从 2005 年到 2018 年 1 月,检索了电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect 和 GlobalHealth)。还检索了灰色文献,并向利益攸关方咨询了其他信息。两名作者评估了研究的合格性,并使用评估饮食摄入研究的改良工具评估了质量。
共纳入 31 项研究,其中 22 项研究包含脂肪信息,17 项研究包含糖信息,14 项研究包含盐信息。饮食评估方法差异很大,使用了 6 种不同的脂肪、糖和盐摄入量的结果衡量指标 - 绝对摄入量、家庭支出、对能量摄入的百分比贡献、来源、可获得性和饮食行为。在所纳入的研究中,脂肪的绝对摄入量范围从所罗门群岛的 25.4 g/d 到关岛的 98.9 g/d,而盐的摄入量范围从基里巴斯的 5.6 g/d 到斐济的 10.3 g/d。只有关岛报告了糖的绝对摄入量(47.3 g/d)。同行评议的研究使用了更高质量的饮食评估方法,而国家调查的报告具有更高的参与率,但主要利用间接方法来量化摄入量。
尽管太平洋地区与饮食相关的疾病已经形成并在不断恶化,但有关太平洋岛民饮食习惯的证据仍然不足。太平洋岛国需要营养监测系统,以充分了解太平洋岛民不断变化的饮食结构,并为有效的政策干预提供信息。