McMillan S A, Fay A C
Regional Immunology Laboratory, Belfast City Hospital, Northern Ireland.
J Clin Pathol. 1988 Nov;41(11):1223-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.11.1223.
Experiments were performed to evaluate five commercial kit assays used for the detection of antibodies to dsDNA. The kits were compared using a performance index score as recommended by the guidelines of the European Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The highest performance score was obtained using the radioimmunoassay from Immunodiagnostic Services Ltd, with the Amersham kit second, the immunofluorescence test using Crithidia luciliae third, the Walker ELISA kit fourth, and the haemagglutination assay fifth. The results showed that none of the kits was outstanding, each appeared to detect a different anti-DNA antibody type as different results were obtained using each kit in assays of quality control sera, linearity of the method, antibody detection in various patient groups, and interference by various substances. It is suggested that laboratories using commercial assay kits for the detection of antibodies to dsDNA should decide which is the most appropriate to their particular needs and that a performance index scoring system may be useful in the comparison of assay evaluations between different laboratories.
开展了实验以评估用于检测抗双链DNA抗体的五种商用试剂盒检测方法。按照欧洲临床实验室标准委员会指南的建议,使用性能指数评分对这些试剂盒进行比较。免疫诊断服务有限公司的放射免疫分析得分最高,其次是安玛西亚试剂盒,利用克氏锥虫的免疫荧光试验排第三,沃克酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒第四,血凝试验第五。结果显示,没有一种试剂盒表现突出,在检测质控血清、方法的线性、不同患者群体中的抗体检测以及各种物质的干扰时,每种试剂盒似乎检测的是不同类型的抗DNA抗体,因为使用每种试剂盒得到的结果都不同。建议使用商用检测试剂盒检测抗双链DNA抗体的实验室应根据自身特殊需求确定最适合的试剂盒,性能指数评分系统可能有助于不同实验室之间比较检测评估结果。