Department of Social Work, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Mental Health. Grimstad, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;54(8):919-926. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01655-4. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
Persons with severe mental health problems (SMHP) point out financial strain as one of their main problems. De-institutionalisation in welfare countries has aimed at normalisation of their living conditions. The aim of the study was to follow the changes in income and source of income during a 10-year period for persons with a first-time psychosis diagnosis (FTPD).
Data were gathered from different registers. Data from persons with FTPD were compared to data on the general population. Two groups with different recovery paths were also compared: one group without contact with the mental health services during the last five consecutive years of the 10-year follow-up, and the other with contact with both 24/7 and community-based services during the same period.
SMHP led to poverty, even if the financial effects of SMHP were attenuated by welfare interventions. Even a recovery path associated with work did not resolve the inequalities generated by SMHP.
Attention should be paid to the risks of confusing the effects of poverty with symptoms of SMHP and thus pathologizing poverty and its impact on human beings. Adequate interventions should consider to improve the financial situation of persons with SMHP.
严重精神健康问题(SMHP)患者指出经济压力是他们的主要问题之一。福利国家的去机构化旨在使他们的生活条件正常化。本研究的目的是在 10 年的时间内,跟踪首次精神病诊断(FTPD)患者的收入和收入来源的变化。
数据来自不同的登记处。将 FTPD 患者的数据与一般人群的数据进行比较。还比较了两种具有不同康复途径的组:一组在 10 年随访的最后五年内与精神卫生服务没有接触,另一组在同一时期与 24/7 和基于社区的服务都有接触。
SMHP 导致贫困,即使福利干预减轻了 SMHP 的经济影响。即使与工作相关的康复途径也不能解决由 SMHP 产生的不平等。
应该注意将贫困的影响与 SMHP 的症状混淆的风险,从而将贫困及其对人类的影响病态化。适当的干预措施应考虑改善 SMHP 患者的财务状况。