Suppr超能文献

用于估算职业男性足球运动员双能X线吸收法测定骨骼肌质量的人体测量学方程的准确性

Accuracy of Anthropometric Equations to Estimate DXA-Derived Skeletal Muscle Mass in Professional Male Soccer Players.

作者信息

González-Mendoza Roberto Gabriel, Gaytán-González Alejandro, Jiménez-Alvarado Juan Antonio, Villegas-Balcázar Marisol, Jáuregui-Ulloa Edtna E, Torres-Naranjo Francisco, López-Taylor Juan R

机构信息

Institute of Applied Sciences for Physical Activity and Sport, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Education, Sport, Recreation and Dance, University Health Sciences Center, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.

Department of Human Reproduction, Infantile Growth and Development, University Health Sciences Center, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico.

出版信息

J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp). 2019 Jan 1;2019:4387636. doi: 10.1155/2019/4387636. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several anthropometric equations that estimate skeletal muscle mass (SMM) have been published, but their applicability and accuracy among athletes are still uncertain.

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of different anthropometric equations that estimate SMM in professional male soccer players, as compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated 179 professional male soccer players aged between 18 and 37 years. Anthropometric measurements (height, body weight, skinfold thicknesses, and girths) and a DXA whole body scan were performed the same day for each participant, and SMM was estimated with nine anthropometric equations (Heymsfield, Martin, Doupe, Kerr, Drinkwater, Lee, De Rose, and two equations published by Kuriyan). To determine differences between SMM estimated with anthropometric equations and SMM evaluated with DXA, a Kruskal-Wallis test was performed using Dunn's test as post hoc. The significance level was set at < 0.05. We calculated the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement for the analyzed equations (Equation - DXA).

RESULTS

Only Heymsfield's and Lee's equations showed no significant differences with DXA. Heymsfield's equation had the smallest mean difference (-0.17 kg), but wider limits of agreement with DXA (-6.61 to 6.94 kg). Lee's equation had a small mean difference (1.10 kg) but narrower limits of agreement with DXA (-1.83 to 4.03 kg).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the prediction equation published by Lee et al. showed the best agreement with DXA and is able to estimate SMM accurately in professional male soccer players.

摘要

背景

已有多个用于估算骨骼肌质量(SMM)的人体测量学方程发表,但其在运动员中的适用性和准确性仍不确定。

目的

与作为参考方法的双能X线吸收法(DXA)相比,评估不同人体测量学方程估算职业男性足球运动员SMM的准确性。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,我们评估了179名年龄在18至37岁之间的职业男性足球运动员。为每位参与者在同一天进行了人体测量(身高、体重、皮褶厚度和周长)以及DXA全身扫描,并使用九个人体测量学方程(海姆斯菲尔德、马丁、杜普、克尔、德林克沃特、李、德罗塞以及库里扬发表的两个方程)估算SMM。为确定用人体测量学方程估算的SMM与用DXA评估的SMM之间的差异,使用邓恩检验作为事后检验进行了克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验。显著性水平设定为<0.05。我们计算了分析方程(方程 - DXA)的平均差异和95%一致性界限。

结果

只有海姆斯菲尔德方程和李方程与DXA无显著差异。海姆斯菲尔德方程的平均差异最小(-0.17千克),但与DXA的一致性界限更宽(-6.61至6.94千克)。李方程的平均差异较小(1.10千克),但与DXA的一致性界限更窄(-1.83至4.03千克)。

结论

在本研究中,李等人发表的预测方程与DXA的一致性最佳,并且能够准确估算职业男性足球运动员的SMM。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cfc/6332936/4279af5fcf5c/JSM2019-4387636.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验