College of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Noji-higashi, Kusatsu, Shiga, 525-8577, Japan.
Korey Stringer Institute, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Sports Med. 2019 Mar;49(3):365-370. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01067-z.
The existing literature suggests two standpoints in defining heat intolerance, which are heat tolerance as state or trait. The former bases its case in the plasticity of human physiology, where one may gain or lose the adaptations associated with heat acclimatization and the ability to tolerate heat is considered transient. This phenomenon is exemplified in the recovery process of exertional heat stroke (EHS) patients in that victims of EHS are able to eventually regain heat tolerance and return to activity without recurrent episodes of EHS. On the other hand, an increasing number of reports imply that genetic predisposition may be associated with one's vulnerability to heat stress. Individuals who seem to exhibit lower than expected exercise tolerance in moderate heat and those who never regain heat tolerance post EHS fall into this category. However, there is a large area of uncertainty in this debate because a true prospective investigation of factors associated with heat intolerance is methodologically difficult. We conclude from the current literature that both mechanisms of heat intolerance (state and trait) should be considered in interpreting the mechanism and cause of heat intolerance.
现有文献对不耐热提出了两种观点,即耐热状态或耐热特质。前者以人体生理学的可塑性为依据,人可能获得或失去与热适应相关的适应能力,而耐热能力被认为是暂时的。这一现象在运动性中暑(EHS)患者的恢复过程中得到了例证,即 EHS 患者最终能够恢复耐热能力并重新活动,而不会再次发生 EHS。另一方面,越来越多的报告表明,遗传易感性可能与人体对热应激的脆弱性有关。在适度热环境下表现出低于预期的运动耐力的个体,以及那些在 EHS 后从未恢复耐热能力的个体,都属于这一类。然而,由于对与不耐热相关的因素进行真正的前瞻性调查在方法学上存在困难,因此这一争论存在很大的不确定性。我们从现有文献中得出结论,在解释不耐热的机制和原因时,应同时考虑不耐热的两种机制(状态和特质)。