Kashyap Amrit, Keilholz Shella
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Netw Neurosci. 2019 Feb 1;3(2):405-426. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00070. eCollection 2019.
Brain network models (BNMs) have become a promising theoretical framework for simulating signals that are representative of whole-brain activity such as resting-state fMRI. However, it has been difficult to compare the complex brain activity obtained from simulations to empirical data. Previous studies have used simple metrics to characterize coordination between regions such as functional connectivity. We extend this by applying various different dynamic analysis tools that are currently used to understand empirical resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) to the simulated data. We show that certain properties correspond to the structural connectivity input that is shared between the models, and certain dynamic properties relate more to the mathematical description of the brain network model. We conclude that the dynamic properties that explicitly examine patterns of signal as a function of time rather than spatial coordination between different brain regions in the rs-fMRI signal seem to provide the largest contrasts between different BNMs and the unknown empirical dynamical system. Our results will be useful in constraining and developing more realistic simulations of whole-brain activity.
脑网络模型(BNMs)已成为一种很有前景的理论框架,用于模拟代表全脑活动的信号,如静息态功能磁共振成像(resting-state fMRI)。然而,将模拟得到的复杂脑活动与实证数据进行比较一直很困难。先前的研究使用简单指标来表征区域间的协调,如功能连接。我们通过将目前用于理解实证静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)的各种不同动态分析工具应用于模拟数据来扩展这一方法。我们表明,某些属性对应于模型之间共享的结构连接输入,而某些动态属性与脑网络模型的数学描述关系更大。我们得出结论,在rs-fMRI信号中,明确将信号模式作为时间函数而非不同脑区之间的空间协调来检查的动态属性,似乎在不同的BNMs与未知的实证动态系统之间提供了最大的差异。我们的结果将有助于约束和开发更逼真的全脑活动模拟。