Barbosa Tiago M, Bartolomeu Raul, Morais Jorge E, Costa Mário J
Physical Education and Sport Science Academic Group, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health and Human Development (CIDESD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Front Physiol. 2019 Feb 15;10:73. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00073. eCollection 2019.
The aim was to compare the anthropometrics, biomechanics and energetics in young swimmers of different competitive levels. Seventy-five boys aged between 11 and 13 years-old with a broad range of performances were ranked based on their personal best time in the men's 100m freestyle event and then split-up into three tiers (Tier-1, i.e., top-tier, best performers; Tier-2, mid-tier; Tier-3, lower-tier). A set of anthropometric features was measured (height, body mass, arm span and trunk transverse surface area). Stroke kinematics (speed, stroke length, stroke frequency) was assessed by a Speedo-meter. Swim efficiency was then estimated (stroke index, speed fluctuation, Froude efficiency). Hydrodynamics assessment encompassed the estimation of active drag and drag coefficient by velocity perturbation method and a set of dimensionless numbers (Froude, hull speed, Reynolds). Mechanical power (to overcome drag, transfer of kinetic energy to water, external power) and power input were derived. There was a significant variation with moderate effect sizes in all anthropometric features but the trunk transverse surface area. Tier-1 swimmers were taller, heavier and with longer limbs than remaining counterparts. There were also significant variations in the stroke kinematics with moderate-large effect sizes. Tier-1 swimmers showed higher stroke frequency, stroke length, speed, stroke index and propelling efficiency but lower speed fluctuations. Reynold number, Froude number and hull speed were significantly higher in Tier-1 swimmers, denoting large effect sizes. The mechanical power and power input delivered were significantly higher in tier-1 swimmers, showing moderate effect sizes. As a conclusion, it was noted significant variations, with moderate-large effect sizes, among the three tiers, for the vast majority of the selected variables. The better performances by tier-1 swimmers were related to their anthropometrics, biomechanics and energetics.
目的是比较不同竞技水平的年轻游泳运动员的人体测量学、生物力学和能量学特征。75名年龄在11至13岁之间、成绩范围广泛的男孩,根据他们在男子100米自由泳项目中的个人最佳成绩进行排名,然后分为三个等级(一级,即顶级,最佳表现者;二级,中级;三级,低级)。测量了一组人体测量特征(身高、体重、臂展和躯干横截面积)。通过速度计评估划水运动学(速度、划水长度、划水频率)。然后估计游泳效率(划水指数、速度波动、弗劳德效率)。流体动力学评估包括通过速度扰动法估计主动阻力和阻力系数以及一组无量纲数(弗劳德数、船速、雷诺数)。得出了机械功率(克服阻力、将动能传递到水中、外部功率)和功率输入。除躯干横截面积外,所有人体测量特征均存在显著差异,效应量中等。一级游泳运动员比其他运动员更高、更重且四肢更长。划水运动学也存在显著差异,效应量为中等至大。一级游泳运动员表现出更高的划水频率、划水长度、速度、划水指数和推进效率,但速度波动更低。一级游泳运动员的雷诺数、弗劳德数和船速显著更高,表明效应量较大。一级游泳运动员的机械功率和功率输入显著更高,效应量中等。总之,对于绝大多数选定变量,三个等级之间存在显著差异,效应量为中等至大。一级游泳运动员的更好表现与他们的人体测量学、生物力学和能量学有关。