• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘制中国 31 个省份的文化紧张程度及其与创新、城市化和幸福感的关系图。

Mapping cultural tightness and its links to innovation, urbanization, and happiness across 31 provinces in China.

机构信息

Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, 178899 Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117576 Singapore, Singapore;

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6720-6725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815723116. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1815723116
PMID:30833399
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6452675/
Abstract

We conduct a 3-y study involving 11,662 respondents to map cultural tightness-the degree to which a society is characterized by rules and norms and the extent to which people are punished or sanctioned when they deviate from these rules and norms-across 31 provinces in China. Consistent with prior research, we find that culturally tight provinces are associated with increased governmental control, constraints in daily life, religious practices, and exposure to threats. Departing from previous findings that tighter states are more rural, conservative, less creative, and less happy, cultural tightness in China is associated with urbanization, economic growth, better health, greater tolerance toward the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) community, and gender equality. Further, analyzing about 3.85 million granted patents in China (1990-2013), we find that provinces with tighter cultures have lower rates of substantive/radical innovations yet higher rates of incremental innovations; individuals from culturally tighter provinces reported higher levels of experienced happiness.

摘要

我们进行了一项为期 3 年的研究,涉及 11662 名受访者,以绘制中国 31 个省份的文化紧张程度图谱——社会的规则和规范程度以及当人们偏离这些规则和规范时受到惩罚或制裁的程度。与先前的研究一致,我们发现文化紧张的省份与政府控制的增加、日常生活的限制、宗教实践以及面临威胁有关。与之前的研究结果不同,之前的研究结果表明,文化更紧张的州更农村、更保守、更缺乏创造力、更不快乐,而中国的文化紧张程度与城市化、经济增长、更好的健康状况、对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(LGBT)群体的更大容忍度以及性别平等有关。此外,通过分析中国(1990-2013 年)约 385 万项已授权专利,我们发现文化更紧张的省份的实质性/激进创新率较低,但增量创新率较高;来自文化更紧张省份的个人报告的幸福感水平更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2f6/6452675/86a0db81f6f2/pnas.1815723116fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2f6/6452675/86a0db81f6f2/pnas.1815723116fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2f6/6452675/86a0db81f6f2/pnas.1815723116fig01.jpg

相似文献

1
Mapping cultural tightness and its links to innovation, urbanization, and happiness across 31 provinces in China.绘制中国 31 个省份的文化紧张程度及其与创新、城市化和幸福感的关系图。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6720-6725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815723116. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
Universal and culture-specific patterns of tightness-looseness across the 31 Chinese provinces.中国31个省份松紧程度的普遍模式和特定文化模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):6522-6524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902401116. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
3
Historically rice-farming societies have tighter social norms in China and worldwide.历史上,中国乃至全世界的稻作社会都有着更严格的社会规范。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19816-19824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909909117. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
A lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender dedicated inpatient psychiatric unit in rural New England: a descriptive analysis in demographics, service utilisation and needs.新英格兰乡村地区一家专门收治女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者的住院精神科病房:人口统计学、服务利用情况及需求的描述性分析
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Dec;25(23-24):3570-3576. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13253. Epub 2016 May 30.
5
Scrambling for access: availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of healthcare for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in South Africa.争夺医疗机会:南非女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者获得医疗保健的可及性、可利用性、可接受性及质量
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 May 30;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12914-017-0124-4.
6
Building nurses' capacity to address health inequities: incorporating lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender health content in a family nurse practitioner programme.培养护士应对健康不平等问题的能力:将女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者健康内容纳入家庭执业护士项目。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Sep;26(17-18):2807-2817. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13707. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
7
Gender bias in cultural tightness across the 50 US states, its correlates, and links to gender inequality in leadership and innovation.美国50个州文化紧密性中的性别偏见、其相关因素以及与领导力和创新方面性别不平等的联系。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Jul 20;2(8):pgad238. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad238. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
A Qualitative Study of the Barriers to and Facilitators of Smoking Cessation Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Smokers Who Are Interested in Quitting.一项针对有戒烟意愿的男同性恋、女同性恋、双性恋和跨性别吸烟者戒烟障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
LGBT Health. 2017 Feb;4(1):24-33. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2016.0059. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
9
Cultural value mismatch in urbanizing China: A large-scale analysis of collectivism and happiness based on social media and nationwide survey.中国城市化进程中的文化价值错位:基于社交媒体和全国性调查对集体主义与幸福感的大规模分析
Int J Psychol. 2018 Dec;53 Suppl 2:54-63. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12523. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Families.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别家庭。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;63(6):1107-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Social influence during public crises: Weekly dynamics and adaptive patterns of conformity to the collective following the COVID-19 outbreak.公共危机期间的社会影响:COVID-19 疫情爆发后民众每周的动态变化及对集体的适应性从众模式
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 24;122(25):e2500008122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500008122. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
The chronospatial revolution in psychology.心理学中的时空革命。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02229-y.
3
Explaining disparities in robot applications among nations and regions: A cross-level lens of cultural tightness-looseness.

本文引用的文献

1
Innovation in the collective brain.集体智慧中的创新。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Mar 19;371(1690). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0192.
2
How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations.文化如何嵌入大脑:社会规范违反相关事件电位的文化差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 15;112(50):15348-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509839112. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Subjective and Objective Hierarchies and Their Relations to Psychological Well-Being: A U.S/Japan Comparison.
解释国家和地区之间机器人应用的差异:文化松紧程度的跨层次视角。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0321173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321173. eCollection 2025.
4
Social inequality and cultural factors impact the awareness and reaction during the cryptic transmission period of pandemic.社会不平等和文化因素会影响大流行隐性传播期间的认知和反应。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Feb 14;4(2):pgaf043. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf043. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Development and validation of the ethnic trust scale in China.中国民族信任量表的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 14;15:1394819. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1394819. eCollection 2024.
6
Cognitive entailments among "the true, the good, the beautiful": a mainland Chinese sample.“真、善、美”之间的认知蕴涵:中国大陆样本。
Cogn Process. 2024 Nov;25(4):647-654. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01200-5. Epub 2024 May 29.
7
Evidence from 43 countries that disease leaves cultures unchanged in the short-term.来自 43 个国家的证据表明,疾病在短期内不会改变文化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33155-6.
8
Changes in social norms during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic across 43 countries.COVID-19 大流行早期 43 个国家社会规范的变化。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 16;15(1):1436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44999-5.
9
Assessing the effects of pandemic risk on cooperation and social norms using a before-after Covid-19 comparison in two long-term experiments.使用新冠疫情前后对比的方法,在两项长期实验中评估大流行风险对合作和社会规范的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 9;14(1):3356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53427-z.
10
Risk, sanctions and norm change: the formation and decay of social distancing norms.风险、制裁与规范变迁:社交距离规范的形成与消解。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230035. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0035. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
主观与客观等级及其与心理健康的关系:美日比较
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2014 Nov;5(8):855-864. doi: 10.1177/1948550614538461.
4
Tightness-looseness across the 50 united states.50 个州的紧松度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):7990-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317937111. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study.紧密文化和松散文化的差异:一项 33 国研究。
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1197754.
6
On "feeling right" in cultural contexts: how person-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective well-being.论文化背景下的“感觉良好”:人与文化的匹配如何影响自尊和主观幸福感。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1563-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797610384742. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
7
Intellectual property. China's innovation landscape.知识产权。中国的创新格局。
Science. 2010 Aug 6;329(5992):632-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1190212.
8
Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities.城市中的增长、创新、规模扩张以及生活节奏。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 24;104(17):7301-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610172104. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
9
Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism.集体主义中的集体在哪里(是谁)?迈向个人主义和集体主义的概念澄清。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):133-51. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133.
10
On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness.论文化松紧性的本质与重要性。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1225-44. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225.