• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同表面处理对钛牙种植体微观形态的影响

Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Titanium Dental Implant Micro-Morphology.

作者信息

Marenzi Gaetano, Impero Filomena, Scherillo Fabio, Sammartino Josè Camilla, Squillace Antonino, Spagnuolo Gianrico

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples "Federico II", P.le Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 4;12(5):733. doi: 10.3390/ma12050733.

DOI:10.3390/ma12050733
PMID:30836588
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6427554/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Titanium dental implants are today widely used with osseointegration mainly dependently on the implant surface properties. Different processing routes lead to different surface characteristics resulting, of course, in different in situ behaviors of the implants.

MATERIALS

The effect of different treatments, whether mechanical or chemical, on the surface morphology of titanium implants were investigated. To this aim, various experimental methods, including roughness analysis as well scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations, were applied.

RESULTS

The results showed that, in contrast to the mechanical treatments, the chemical ones gave rise to a more irregular surface. SEM observations suggested that where commercial pure titanium was used, the chemical treatments provided implant surfaces without contaminations. In contrast, sandblasted implants could cause potential risks of surface contamination because of the presence of blasting particles remnants.

CONCLUSIONS

The examined implant surfaces showed different roughness levels in relation to the superficial treatment applied. The acid-etched surfaces were characterized by the presence of deeper valleys and higher peaks than the sandblasted surfaces. For this reason, acid-etched surfaces can be more easily damaged by the stress produced by the peri-implant bone during surgical implant placement.

摘要

背景

如今,钛牙种植体被广泛使用,其骨整合主要依赖于种植体表面特性。不同的加工工艺会导致不同的表面特征,当然也会导致种植体在原位的不同行为。

材料

研究了不同处理(机械处理或化学处理)对钛种植体表面形态的影响。为此,应用了各种实验方法,包括粗糙度分析以及扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察。

结果

结果表明,与机械处理相比,化学处理会使表面更不规则。SEM观察表明,使用商业纯钛时,化学处理可提供无污染的种植体表面。相比之下,喷砂处理的种植体由于存在喷砂颗粒残余物,可能会导致表面污染的潜在风险。

结论

所检查的种植体表面根据所应用的表面处理显示出不同的粗糙度水平。酸蚀表面的特征是比喷砂表面存在更深的凹谷和更高的峰值。因此,在手术植入种植体时,酸蚀表面更容易受到种植体周围骨产生的应力的损伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/3e9310c8556b/materials-12-00733-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/c9bf4d3eccb9/materials-12-00733-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/76f5cc7c02da/materials-12-00733-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/b2265e4ef188/materials-12-00733-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/aebcc2a631ed/materials-12-00733-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/d7b68db535e4/materials-12-00733-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/00acbce08d75/materials-12-00733-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/9d34a41b605a/materials-12-00733-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/8ce316acf937/materials-12-00733-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/68c77c18a850/materials-12-00733-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/cc7b8b319449/materials-12-00733-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/3e9310c8556b/materials-12-00733-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/c9bf4d3eccb9/materials-12-00733-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/76f5cc7c02da/materials-12-00733-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/b2265e4ef188/materials-12-00733-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/aebcc2a631ed/materials-12-00733-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/d7b68db535e4/materials-12-00733-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/00acbce08d75/materials-12-00733-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/9d34a41b605a/materials-12-00733-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/8ce316acf937/materials-12-00733-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/68c77c18a850/materials-12-00733-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/cc7b8b319449/materials-12-00733-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1b3/6427554/3e9310c8556b/materials-12-00733-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Titanium Dental Implant Micro-Morphology.不同表面处理对钛牙种植体微观形态的影响
Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 4;12(5):733. doi: 10.3390/ma12050733.
2
Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study.喷砂酸蚀和氧化钛牙科种植体的比较:体内研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 3;20(13):3267. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133267.
3
Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.机械加工与喷砂及酸蚀钛植入物的表面分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Nov-Dec;15(6):779-84.
4
A macro- and nanostructure evaluation of a novel dental implant.一种新型牙科植入物的宏观和纳米结构评估
Implant Dent. 2008 Sep;17(3):309-20. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318182d494.
5
Comparison of early osseointegration between laser-treated/acid-etched and sandblasted/acid-etched titanium implant surfaces.激光处理/酸蚀和喷砂/酸蚀钛种植体表面的早期骨整合比较。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018 Mar 30;29(4):43. doi: 10.1007/s10856-018-6049-1.
6
Titanium dental implant surface micromorphology optimization.钛牙种植体表面微观形态优化
J Oral Implantol. 2007;33(4):177-85. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[177:TDISMO]2.0.CO;2.
7
Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Rough Surfaces: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in an Adult Minipig Model.不同表面粗糙度钛植入物的骨整合:成年小型猪模型中的组织学和组织形态计量学研究。
Implant Dent. 2017 Jun;26(3):357-366. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000560.
8
Osteoblastic cell behaviour on modified titanium surfaces.成骨细胞在改性钛表面的行为。
Micron. 2018 Feb;105:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Chemical and Topographic Analysis of Eight commercially Available Dental Implants.八种市售牙科植入物的化学和形貌分析
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 May 1;17(5):354-60. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1855.
10
Hydrophilic surface of Ti6Al4V-ELI alloy improves the early bone apposition of sheep tibia.Ti6Al4V-ELI 合金的亲水表面提高了绵羊胫骨的早期骨附着。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Aug;28(8):893-901. doi: 10.1111/clr.12894. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone Stability After Immediate Implants and Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A 15-Year Retrospective Clinical Study.即刻种植与牙槽嵴保存后的骨稳定性:一项15年的回顾性临床研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 2;13(7):299. doi: 10.3390/dj13070299.
2
Effect of Vacuum Plasma Activation on Early Implant Stability: a Single-Blind Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.真空等离子体活化对早期种植体稳定性的影响:一项单盲半口随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2025 Jun 30;16(2):e4. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2025.16205. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Implant Body Fracture Due to Fatigue in a Maxillary Implant-Retained Overdenture Treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Titanium Surface Properties Influence the Biological Activity and FasL Expression of Craniofacial Stromal Cells.钛表面特性影响颅面基质细胞的生物活性和FasL表达。
Stem Cells Int. 2019 Jan 13;2019:4670560. doi: 10.1155/2019/4670560. eCollection 2019.
2
Metallic wear debris collected from patients induces apoptosis in rat primary osteoblasts via reactive oxygen species‑mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum stress.从患者体内收集到的金属磨损颗粒通过活性氧介导的线粒体功能障碍和内质网应激诱导大鼠原代成骨细胞凋亡。
Mol Med Rep. 2019 Mar;19(3):1629-1637. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.9825. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
3
上颌种植体支持覆盖义齿治疗中因疲劳导致的种植体骨折
Case Rep Dent. 2025 Mar 18;2025:4064452. doi: 10.1155/crid/4064452. eCollection 2025.
4
Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted-Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up.喷砂酸蚀表面牙种植体的长期临床研究:12年随访
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 4;18(1):183. doi: 10.3390/ma18010183.
5
Evaluation of Human Gingival Fibroblasts (HGFs) Behavior on Innovative Laser Colored Titanium Surfaces.评估人牙龈成纤维细胞在新型激光彩色钛表面的行为。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 22;16(13):4530. doi: 10.3390/ma16134530.
6
A Bioinspired Gelatin-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Coating on Titanium Implant for Bone Regeneration.仿生明胶-无定形磷酸钙钛植入物涂层促进骨再生。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2023 Aug;12(20):e2203411. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202203411. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
7
Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study.微创种植牙与标准种植牙的生物学行为及表面形貌评估比较:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;15(21):7540. doi: 10.3390/ma15217540.
8
Modification of Zirconia Implant Surfaces by Nd:YAG Laser Grooves: Does It Change Cell Behavior?钕钇铝石榴石激光刻槽对氧化锆种植体表面的改性:它会改变细胞行为吗?
Biomimetics (Basel). 2022 Apr 20;7(2):49. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7020049.
9
Bioactive Dental Materials: The Current Status.生物活性牙科材料:现状
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 9;15(6):2016. doi: 10.3390/ma15062016.
10
Endosseous Dental Implant Materials and Clinical Outcomes of Different Alloys: A Systematic Review.不同合金的骨内牙种植体材料及临床结果:一项系统评价
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 7;15(5):1979. doi: 10.3390/ma15051979.
Glancing-Angle Deposition of Nanostructures on an Implant Material Surface.
纳米结构在植入材料表面的掠角沉积
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019 Jan 4;9(1):60. doi: 10.3390/nano9010060.
4
Effects of various prophylactic procedures on titanium surfaces and biofilm formation.各种预防措施对钛表面及生物膜形成的影响。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018 Dec 27;48(6):373-382. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.6.373. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
A Review of the Impact of Implant Biomaterials on Osteocytes.植入生物材料对骨细胞影响的综述。
J Dent Res. 2018 Aug;97(9):977-986. doi: 10.1177/0022034518778033. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
6
In Vivo Evaluation of Dual Acid-Etched and Grit-Blasted/Acid-Etched Implants With Identical Macrogeometry in High-Density Bone.体内评估在高密度骨中具有相同宏观几何形状的双重酸蚀和喷砂/酸蚀种植体。
Implant Dent. 2017 Dec;26(6):815-819. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000672.
7
Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review.口腔种植体表面特性:综述。
Dent Mater. 2018 Jan;34(1):40-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Novel Approach in the Use of Plasma Spray: Preparation of Bulk Titanium for Bone Augmentations.等离子喷涂使用的新方法:用于骨增量的块状钛的制备。
Materials (Basel). 2017 Aug 24;10(9):987. doi: 10.3390/ma10090987.
9
Early Healing Evaluation of Commercially Pure Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V Presenting Similar Surface Texture: An In Vivo Study.商用纯钛和 Ti-6Al-4V 表面纹理相似的早期愈合评价:一项体内研究。
Implant Dent. 2017 Jun;26(3):338-344. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000591.
10
Monitoring the Changes of Material Properties at Bone-Implant Interface during the Healing Process In Vivo: A Viscoelastic Investigation.体内愈合过程中骨-植入物界面材料特性变化的监测:一项粘弹性研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1945607. doi: 10.1155/2017/1945607. Epub 2017 Mar 8.