Suppr超能文献

形态学与等速肌力差异:不同体育活动导致的双侧及同侧变化

Morphological and Isokinetic Strength Differences: Bilateral and Ipsilateral Variation by Different Sport Activity.

作者信息

Maly Tomas, Mala Lucia, Bujnovsky David, Hank Mikulas, Zahalka Frantisek

机构信息

Sport Research Centre, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, Prague Czech Republic.

出版信息

Open Med (Wars). 2019 Feb 20;14:207-216. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0014. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the morphological and isokinetic strength asymmetry and magnitude in young athletes.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty nine male subjects (soccer, floorball, non-athletes) were measured for proportion of muscle mass between upper extremities (BADΔ) and lower extremities (BLDΔ). Moreover, the peak muscle torque of knee extensors (PTE) and flexors (PTF), ipsilateral (H:Q) and bilateral strength ratio (Q:Q, H:H) were measured.

RESULTS

We found significant differences in observed parameters with respect to different sport activities (F = 13.02, p = 0.00, = 0.80). Higher values of BADΔ were observed in the non-active (0.19 ± 0.11 kg) group compared with soccer players (0.10 ± 0.11 kg). We found a lower value of BLDΔ in floorball players (0.32 ± 0.11 kg) compared with soccer players (0.58 ± 0.27 kg) and non-active boys (0.63 ± 0.28 kg). Results revealed significantly higher PTE in soccer players compared with non-active boys and floorball players and higher Q:Q ratio in soccer players (10.99 ± 7.75%) compared with non-active boys (7.47 ± 5.92%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that there are morphological and strength asymmetries in the observed groups, which may have potential maladaptive effects (e.g. uncompensated overload of extremity) in athletes affected by specific load.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查年轻运动员的形态学和等速肌力不对称性及程度。

方法

对139名男性受试者(足球运动员、地板球运动员、非运动员)测量了上肢(BADΔ)和下肢(BLDΔ)肌肉质量比例。此外,还测量了膝关节伸肌(PTE)和屈肌(PTF)的峰值肌肉扭矩、同侧(H:Q)和双侧力量比(Q:Q,H:H)。

结果

我们发现,不同体育活动的观察参数存在显著差异(F = 13.02,p = 0.00, = 0.80)。与足球运动员(0.10±0.11 kg)相比,非运动组(0.19±0.11 kg)的BADΔ值更高。与足球运动员(0.58±0.27 kg)和非运动男孩(0.63±0.28 kg)相比,地板球运动员的BLDΔ值更低(0.32±0.11 kg)。结果显示,与非运动男孩和地板球运动员相比,足球运动员的PTE显著更高,与非运动男孩(7.47±5.92%)相比,足球运动员的Q:Q比值更高(10.99±7.75%)。

结论

本研究表明,观察组存在形态学和力量不对称性,这可能对受特定负荷影响的运动员产生潜在的适应不良影响(如肢体未代偿的过载)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
The bilateral strength and power asymmetries in untrained boys.未受过训练的男孩的双侧力量和功率不对称性。
Open Med (Wars). 2015 Apr 1;10(1):224-232. doi: 10.1515/med-2015-0034. eCollection 2015.
5
Isokinetic Strength Profile of Elite Female Handball Players.精英女子手球运动员的等速力量特征
J Hum Kinet. 2015 Dec 30;49:257-66. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0128. eCollection 2015 Dec 22.
10
Mechanisms of maladaptation to physical exercise in Moscow schoolchildren.
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2012 Aug;153(4):428-30. doi: 10.1007/s10517-012-1732-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验