Kondziella Daniel, Cheung Man Cheung, Dutta Anirban
Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PeerJ. 2019 Mar 6;7:e6575. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6575. eCollection 2019.
The vegetative state (VS)/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) denotes brain-injured, awake patients who are seemingly without awareness. Still, up to 15% of these patients show signs of covert consciousness when examined by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or EEG, which is known as cognitive motor dissociation (CMD). Experts often prefer the term to avoid the negative connotations associated with and to highlight the possibility for CMD. However, the perception of VS/UWS by the public has never been studied systematically.
Using an online crowdsourcing platform, we recruited 1,297 lay people from 32 countries. We investigated if and might have a different influence on attitudes towards VS/UWS and the concept of CMD.
Participants randomized to be inquired about the believed that CMD was less plausible (mean estimated frequency in unresponsive patients 38.07% ± SD 25.15) than participants randomized to (42.29% ± SD 26.63; Cohen's d 0.164; = 0.016). Attitudes towards treatment withdrawal were similar. Most participants preferred (60.05%), although a sizeable minority favored (24.21%; difference 35.84%, 95% CI 29.36 to 41.87; < 0.0001). Searches on PubMed and Google Trends revealed that is increasingly used by academics but not lay people.
Simply replacing with may not be fully appropriate given that one of four prefer the first term. We suggest that physicians take advantage of the controversy around the terminology to explain relatives the concept of CMD and its ethical implications.
植物状态(VS)/无反应觉醒综合征(UWS)指的是脑部受伤、清醒但看似没有意识的患者。然而,通过功能磁共振成像(fMRI)或脑电图检查时,高达15%的此类患者表现出隐匿意识的迹象,这被称为认知运动分离(CMD)。专家们通常更喜欢使用这个术语,以避免与前者相关的负面含义,并强调CMD的可能性。然而,公众对VS/UWS的认知从未得到系统研究。
我们通过一个在线众包平台,从32个国家招募了1297名普通民众。我们调查了这两个术语是否可能对人们对VS/UWS以及CMD概念的态度产生不同影响。
被随机询问使用“植物状态(VS)”的参与者认为CMD的可信度较低(无反应患者中的平均估计频率为38.07%±标准差25.15),低于被随机询问使用“无反应觉醒综合征(UWS)”的参与者(42.29%±标准差26.63;科恩d值为0.164;P = 0.016)。对撤除治疗的态度相似。大多数参与者更喜欢使用“植物状态(VS)”(60.05%),尽管有相当一部分少数人更喜欢“无反应觉醒综合征(UWS)”(24.21%;差异为35.84%,95%置信区间为29.36至41.87;P < 0.0001)。对PubMed和谷歌趋势的搜索显示,学术界越来越多地使用“无反应觉醒综合征(UWS)”,但普通民众并非如此。
鉴于四分之一的人更喜欢第一个术语,简单地用“无反应觉醒综合征(UWS)”取代“植物状态(VS)”可能并不完全合适。我们建议医生利用围绕术语的争议,向亲属解释CMD的概念及其伦理含义。