Research Network in preventive activities and health promotion RedIAPP, Barcelona, Spain.
Health Research Institute of Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 2;14(4):e0214503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214503. eCollection 2019.
The validation of Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)-short version was performed in a general population of a city in a region of Galicia (Spain), the sample was composed of randomly selected Spanish Health Care patients (N = 845). The results on the goodness of fit of the non-hierarchical, five-dimensional factorial model met the criteria for good and acceptable model adjustment (after eliminating item 18 and despite the correlations detected among the errors included in the model), explaining a 55.5%.of the variance. As the second objective has been analysed the association between the scores obtained in the different facets of the FFMQ-SF and the risk of suffering an episode of depression. (The Odd Ratio, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the ROC curve were calculated.) Participants who were currently suffering from an episode of depression were more likely to have low scores in "describing" facet of Mindfulness (adjusted OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.04-2.40, linear trend: χ2 = 3.74, df = 1, p = 0.053) as well as low scores on "acting with awareness" (adjusted OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.461-3.30, linear trend: χ2 = 9.52, df = 1; = 0.002) and "non judging" (adjusted OR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.36-3.09, linear trend: χ2 = 143.21, df = 1; p <0.001). Participants with a previous episode of depression were more likely to have low scores on the subscale "acting with awareness" (adjusted OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.43-3.93, linear trend: χ2 = 9.62, df = 1, p = 0.002) and "non-reactivity" (adjusted OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.28-3.56, linear trend: χ2 = 8.30; df = 1; p = 0.004. Questionnaire FFMQ-SF is an adequate questionnaire for the evaluation of mindfulness in non-clinical multi- occupational population.
五因素正念量表（FFMQ-短式）的验证是在加利西亚（西班牙）一个城市的一般人群中进行的，样本由随机选择的西班牙医疗保健患者组成（N=845）。非层次、五因素因子模型的拟合优度结果符合良好和可接受的模型调整标准（在删除项目 18 后，尽管模型中包含的误差之间存在相关性），解释了 55.5%的方差。作为第二个目标，分析了 FFMQ-SF 的不同方面的分数与患抑郁发作风险之间的关联。（计算了比值比、Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验和 ROC 曲线。）目前患有抑郁发作的参与者更有可能在正念的“描述”方面得分较低（调整后的比值比=1.58，95%置信区间=1.04-2.40，线性趋势：χ2=3.74，df=1，p=0.053），以及在“有意识地行动”（调整后的比值比=2.19，95%置信区间=1.461-3.30，线性趋势：χ2=9.52，df=1；p=0.002）和“不评判”（调整后的比值比=2.05，95%置信区间=1.36-3.09，线性趋势：χ2=143.21，df=1；p<0.001）方面得分较低。有抑郁发作病史的参与者更有可能在“有意识地行动”（调整后的比值比=2.37，95%置信区间=1.43-3.93，线性趋势：χ2=9.62，df=1，p=0.002）和“无反应性”（调整后的比值比=2.14，95%置信区间=1.28-3.56，线性趋势：χ2=8.30，df=1，p=0.004）方面得分较低。FFMQ-SF 是一种评估非临床多职业人群正念的适当问卷。
