Oleszkiewicz Anna, Hummel Thomas
Smell and Taste Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, ul. Dawda 1, 50527, Wroclaw, Poland.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jun;276(6):1849-1852. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05414-8. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
For functionally anosmic subjects, the sense of smell is basically useless in daily activities-they are unlikely to detect the threatening smell of rotten food, gas or smoke, or to enjoy the flavor of food or the smell of perfumes. Although this appears very distressing, functionally anosmic subjects in our sample seemed not to be aware or bothered with impaired olfaction and enrolled for the study targeted to people with a normal sense of smell.
In the large sample of 9139 subjects who declared themselves to have a normal sense of smell, we have retrospectively found a notable proportion of scores indicating functional anosmia.
When we look at the overall Sniffin' Sticks score, 0.45% of the sample was functionally anosmic and this fraction increased to 3.4% when the identification score of 8 points and below was used. We present demographical information of those subjects, who despite their inability to use smell in daily life, consider themselves healthy.
Data offer a new perspective on the importance of olfaction in daily life and supports the notion about the importance of using screening tools in clinical practice.
对于功能性嗅觉减退的受试者而言,嗅觉在日常活动中基本无用——他们不太可能察觉到腐烂食物、煤气或烟雾的危险气味,也无法享受食物的香味或香水的气味。尽管这看起来非常令人苦恼,但我们样本中的功能性嗅觉减退受试者似乎并未意识到嗅觉受损,也未因此而烦恼,他们报名参加了针对嗅觉正常人群的研究。
在9139名自称嗅觉正常的受试者的大样本中,我们通过回顾性研究发现了相当比例的功能性嗅觉减退得分。
从总体嗅觉棒测试得分来看,样本中有0.45%的受试者存在功能性嗅觉减退,而当使用8分及以下的识别得分时,这一比例升至3.4%。我们呈现了这些受试者的人口统计学信息,他们尽管在日常生活中无法利用嗅觉,但仍认为自己身体健康。
数据为嗅觉在日常生活中的重要性提供了新视角,并支持了在临床实践中使用筛查工具的重要性这一观点。