• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在环境和社会不确定性下的牲畜生物安全措施决策:来自实验博弈的证据。

Decision-making in livestock biosecurity practices amidst environmental and social uncertainty: Evidence from an experimental game.

机构信息

Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.

Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0214500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214500. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0214500
PMID:30995253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6469775/
Abstract

Livestock industries are vulnerable to disease threats, which can cost billions of dollars and have substantial negative social ramifications. Losses are mitigated through increased use of disease-related biosecurity practices, making increased biosecurity an industry goal. Currently, there is no industry-wide standard for sharing information about disease incidence or on-site biosecurity strategies, resulting in uncertainty regarding disease prevalence and biosecurity strategies employed by industry stakeholders. Using an experimental simulation game, with primarily student participants, we examined willingness to invest in biosecurity when confronted with disease outbreak scenarios. We varied the scenarios by changing the information provided about 1) disease incidence and 2) biosecurity strategy or response by production facilities to the threat of disease. Here we show that willingness to invest in biosecurity increases with increased information about disease incidence, but decreases with increased information about biosecurity practices used by nearby facilities. Thus, the type or context of the uncertainty confronting the decision maker may be a major factor influencing behavior. Our findings suggest that policies and practices that encourage greater sharing of disease incidence information should have the greatest benefit for protecting herd health.

摘要

畜牧业容易受到疾病威胁,这可能造成数十亿美元的损失,并产生重大的负面社会影响。通过增加使用与疾病相关的生物安全措施,可以减轻损失,因此提高生物安全性是行业的目标。目前,畜牧业没有关于疾病发病率或现场生物安全策略的信息共享的行业标准,导致对疾病流行情况和行业利益相关者采用的生物安全策略存在不确定性。我们使用了一个实验模拟游戏,主要参与者是学生,研究了在面临疾病爆发情景时对生物安全的投资意愿。我们通过改变情景来改变信息,这些信息涉及到 1)疾病发病率和 2)生物安全策略或生产设施对疾病威胁的反应。我们发现,当提供更多关于疾病发病率的信息时,对生物安全的投资意愿会增加,但当提供更多关于附近设施使用的生物安全措施的信息时,投资意愿会降低。因此,决策者面临的不确定性的类型或背景可能是影响行为的一个主要因素。我们的研究结果表明,鼓励增加疾病发病率信息共享的政策和做法,对保护畜群健康应该具有最大的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/0dc3351aa575/pone.0214500.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/8ece9f03cefc/pone.0214500.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/b5d7eef5c4c8/pone.0214500.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/e3d06965b350/pone.0214500.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/74092f5747f7/pone.0214500.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/17c3a89a7422/pone.0214500.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/0dc3351aa575/pone.0214500.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/8ece9f03cefc/pone.0214500.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/b5d7eef5c4c8/pone.0214500.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/e3d06965b350/pone.0214500.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/74092f5747f7/pone.0214500.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/17c3a89a7422/pone.0214500.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/683c/6469775/0dc3351aa575/pone.0214500.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Decision-making in livestock biosecurity practices amidst environmental and social uncertainty: Evidence from an experimental game.在环境和社会不确定性下的牲畜生物安全措施决策:来自实验博弈的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0214500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214500. eCollection 2019.
2
Biosecurity indemnification and attitudes of United States swine producers towards the prevention of an african swine fever outbreak.美国生猪生产者的生物安保赔偿责任和对预防非洲猪瘟爆发的态度。
Prev Vet Med. 2024 Jun;227:106193. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106193. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
3
Exploring the role of small-scale livestock keepers for national biosecurity-The pig case.探索小规模牲畜饲养者在国家生物安全中的作用——以猪为例。
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Sep 15;145:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
4
On-farm characteristics and biosecurity protocols for small-scale swine producers in eastern Australia.澳大利亚东部小规模养猪生产者的农场特征及生物安全协议
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Jan 1;118(1):104-16. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
5
A latent class analysis of biosecurity attitudes and decision-making strategies of swine producers in the United States.美国生猪养殖户生物安全态度和决策策略的潜在类别分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 5;14(1):17427. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67385-z.
6
Using experimental gaming simulations to elicit risk mitigation behavioral strategies for agricultural disease management.利用实验性博弈模拟来引出农业疾病管理的风险缓解行为策略。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 17;15(3):e0228983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228983. eCollection 2020.
7
Development and validation of a scoring system to assess the relative vulnerability of swine breeding herds to the introduction of PRRS virus.一种评估猪繁殖猪群引入猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒相对易感性的评分系统的开发与验证。
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Nov 15;160:116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
Horse owners' biosecurity practices following the first equine influenza outbreak in Australia.马主在澳大利亚首次发生流感后的生物安全措施。
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Dec 15;102(4):304-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Sep 4.
9
Biosecurity and the management of emergency animal disease among commercial beef producers in New South Wales and Queensland (Australia).澳大利亚新南威尔士州和昆士兰州商业肉牛养殖户的生物安全与突发动物疾病管理
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Nov 1;134:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
Reducing Campylobacter and Salmonella infection: two studies of the economic cost and attitude to adoption of on-farm biosecurity measures.减少弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌感染:两项农场生物安全措施经济成本和采用态度的研究。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2010 Dec;57(7-8):e109-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01295.x.

引用本文的文献

1
'Good farmers' and 'real vets': social identities, behaviour change and the future of bovine tuberculosis eradication.“优秀养殖户”与“真正的兽医”:社会身份、行为改变与牛结核病根除的未来
Ir Vet J. 2023 Jul 27;76(Suppl 1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13620-023-00245-w.
2
Editorial: Promoting compliance with biosecurity in animal production.社论:促进动物生产中的生物安全合规
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jun 1;10:1215433. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1215433. eCollection 2023.
3
Connecting livestock disease dynamics to human learning and biosecurity decisions.

本文引用的文献

1
Invited review: Determinants of farmers' adoption of management-based strategies for infectious disease prevention and control.特邀综述:农民采用基于管理的传染病预防与控制策略的决定因素
J Dairy Sci. 2017 May;100(5):3329-3347. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11977. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
2
Exploring Attitudes and Beliefs towards Implementing Cattle Disease Prevention and Control Measures: A Qualitative Study with Dairy Farmers in Great Britain.探索对实施牛病预防和控制措施的态度与信念:一项针对英国奶农的定性研究
Animals (Basel). 2016 Oct 11;6(10):61. doi: 10.3390/ani6100061.
3
Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians' framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England.
将家畜疾病动态与人类认知及生物安全决策联系起来。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jan 20;9:1067364. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1067364. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of message delivery on cross-cultural biosecurity compliance: Insights from experimental simulations.信息传递对跨文化生物安全合规性的影响:来自实验模拟的见解
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 16;9:984945. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.984945. eCollection 2022.
5
Assessing strategic, tactical, and operational decision-making and risk in a livestock production chain through experimental simulation platforms.通过实验模拟平台评估畜牧生产链中的战略、战术和运营决策与风险。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 20;9:962788. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.962788. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparing behavioral risk assessment strategies for quantifying biosecurity compliance to mitigate animal disease spread.比较用于量化生物安全合规性以减轻动物疾病传播的行为风险评估策略。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 3;9:962989. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.962989. eCollection 2022.
7
Modelling livestock infectious disease control policy under differing social perspectives on vaccination behaviour.不同社会视角下疫苗接种行为对牲畜传染病控制政策的影响建模。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jul 14;18(7):e1010235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010235. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Factors affecting the use of biosecurity measures for the protection of ruminant livestock and farm workers against infectious diseases in central South Africa.影响中南部非洲反刍动物牲畜和农场工人传染病生物安全措施使用的因素。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Sep;69(5):e1899-e1912. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14525. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
Message Delivery Strategy Influences Willingness to Comply With Biosecurity.信息传递策略会影响遵守生物安全规定的意愿。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jun 25;8:667265. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.667265. eCollection 2021.
10
Emulating Agricultural Disease Management: Comparing Risk Preferences Between Industry Professionals and Online Participants Using Experimental Gaming Simulations and Paired Lottery Choice Surveys.效仿农业疾病管理:使用实验性游戏模拟和配对彩票选择调查比较行业专业人士和在线参与者之间的风险偏好
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jan 18;7:556668. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.556668. eCollection 2020.
生物安全漏洞?英国兽医对奶牛场生物安全的界定
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Sep 15;132:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
4
Swedish Farmers' Opinions about Biosecurity and Their Intention to Make Professionals Use Clean Protective Clothing When Entering the Stable.瑞典农民对生物安全的看法及其希望专业人员在进入畜舍时穿清洁的防护服的意愿。
Front Vet Sci. 2016 Jun 22;3:46. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00046. eCollection 2016.
5
"1-2-3 Pap" Intervention Improves HPV Vaccine Series Completion among Appalachian Women.“1-2-3巴氏涂片”干预措施提高了阿巴拉契亚女性人乳头瘤病毒疫苗系列接种的完成率。
J Commun. 2013 Feb;63(1):95-115. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12001. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
6
One world--one health: the threat of emerging swine diseases. An Asian perspective.同一个世界——同一份健康:新兴猪病的威胁。亚洲视角。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2012 Mar;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01309.x.
7
An analysis of cattle farmers' perceptions of drivers and barriers to on-farm control of Escherichia coli O157.奶牛养殖户对大肠杆菌O157农场控制的驱动因素和障碍的认知分析
Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Aug;143(11):2355-66. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814003045. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
8
A wrinkle in time: asymmetric valuation of past and future events.
Psychol Sci. 2008 Aug;19(8):796-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02159.x.
9
Discounting of past outcomes.对过去结果的贴现。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;14(3):311-7. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.3.311.
10
Temporal construal.时间构想
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):403-21. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403.