Badea Mihaela, Gaman Laura, Delia Corina, Ilea Anca, Leașu Florin, Henríquez-Hernández Luis Alberto, Luzardo Octavio P, Rădoi Mariana, Rogozea Liliana
Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov 500019, Romania.
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 050474, Romania.
J Clin Med. 2019 May 12;8(5):665. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050665.
It is known that cigarette smoking is correlated with medical associated inquires. New electronic cigarettes are intensively advertised as an alternative to conventional smoking, but only a few studies demonstrate their harmful potential. A cross-sectional study was designed using 150 subjects from Brasov (Romania), divided into three groups: non-smokers (NS = 58), conventional cigarettes smokers (CS = 58) and electronic cigarettes users (ECS = 34). The aim of this study was to determine levels of some plasma lipophilic and hematological components, and the total antioxidant status that could be associated with the smoking status of the subjects. Serum low density lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol increased significantly for ECS participants versus NS group (18.9% difference) ( < 0.05). Also, the CS group is characterized by an increase of serum LDL cholesterol (7.9% difference vs. NS), but with no significant statistical difference. The variation of median values of serum very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) was in order NS < ECS < CS, with statistical difference between NS and CS groups (34.6% difference; = 0.023). When comparing the antioxidant status of the three groups, significant differences ( < 0.05) were obtained between NS vs. CS and NS vs. ECS. Similar behavior was identified for CS and ECS. Statistically significant changes ( < 0.0001) for both vitamin A and vitamin E were identified in the blood of NS vs. CS and NS vs. ECS, and also when comparing vitamin A in the blood of the CS group versus the ECS group ( < 0.05). When all groups were compared, the difference in the white blood cell (WBC) was ( = 0.008). A slight increase in the red blood cell (RBC) count was observed, but with no statistical difference between groups. These results indicated that conventional cigarette and e-cigarette usage promotes the production of excess reactive oxygen species, involving different pathways, different antioxidants and bioactive molecules.
众所周知,吸烟与医疗相关问题存在关联。新型电子烟作为传统吸烟的替代品被大力宣传,但仅有少数研究证明其潜在危害。本横断面研究选取了来自罗马尼亚布拉索夫的150名受试者,分为三组:非吸烟者(NS = 58)、传统香烟吸烟者(CS = 58)和电子烟使用者(ECS = 34)。本研究的目的是确定一些血浆亲脂性和血液学成分的水平,以及可能与受试者吸烟状况相关的总抗氧化状态。与NS组相比,ECS参与者的血清低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇显著升高(差异为18.9%)(P < 0.05)。此外,CS组的血清LDL胆固醇也有所升高(与NS组相比差异为7.9%),但无显著统计学差异。血清极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL)中位数的变化顺序为NS < ECS < CS,NS组和CS组之间存在统计学差异(差异为34.6%;P = 0.023)。比较三组的抗氧化状态时,NS组与CS组以及NS组与ECS组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。CS组和ECS组表现出相似的情况。在NS组与CS组、NS组与ECS组的血液中,维生素A和维生素E均有统计学显著变化(P < 0.0001),在比较CS组与ECS组血液中的维生素A时也有显著变化(P < 0.05)。比较所有组时,白细胞(WBC)差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.008)。观察到红细胞(RBC)计数略有增加,但组间无统计学差异。这些结果表明,使用传统香烟和电子烟会促进过量活性氧的产生,涉及不同途径、不同抗氧化剂和生物活性分子。