Department of Applied Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Department Therapy Science I, Brandenburg Technical University Cottbus - Senftenberg, Universitätsplatz 1, 01968, Senftenberg, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4273-0.
A psychometrically robust measurement instrument is prerequisite to tailor and monitor interventions aiming to improve evidence-based practice (EBP). The recently developed "Evidence-based Practice Inventory" (EBPI) questionnaire (five dimensions) provides a sound inventory for a comprehensive assessment of adherence to EBP, and identification of barriers and facilitators for EBP. The aims of this study were to establish a German language version of the EBPI and to examine the instrument's reliability in a diverse sample of healthcare professionals.
The English version of the EBPI was translated, adopted and subsequently test-retest reliability of the German language EBPI was examined in a nationwide online survey. Participants working in Germany were invited to complete the questionnaire twice. For each EBPI dimension, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) and the relative test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) were calculated. The standard error of measurement, limits of agreement and minimal detectable change values were estimated to quantify measurement error.
A German language version of the EBPI was established. In the online survey, the EBPI was initially completed by 889 healthcare professionals. At follow-up, 344 individuals (39%) completed the questionnaire (74% female; mean work experience: 13.6 years). The ICCs for the five dimensions varied between 0.78 and 0.86. The standard error of measurement varied between 6.5 and 8.8% of the respective dimension scale range, and the limits of agreement between 24 and 37%. For internal consistency reliability, alpha varied between 0.64 and 0.90. There were neither floor nor ceiling effects, nor any other relevant feasibility issues.
The German language EBPI can be used to assess EBP adherence of healthcare professionals in clinical practice, and to identify barriers and facilitators for an EBP conform behaviour. Results on test-retest reliability indicate that the EBPI produces reliable scores when used for group comparisons, but the questionnaire seems insufficiently reliable for individual measurements over time. Methods of item response theory or Rasch measurement theory should be used for further evaluation and revision of the EBPI, informed by the results of this study.
German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00013792 ). Registered 19 January 2018.
为了定制和监测旨在改善循证实践(EBP)的干预措施,需要使用具有良好心理测量学特性的测量工具。最近开发的“循证实践量表”(EBPI)问卷(五个维度)为全面评估对 EBP 的依从性,以及识别 EBP 的障碍和促进因素提供了一个合理的量表。本研究的目的是建立德语版的 EBPI,并在不同的医疗保健专业人员样本中检验该工具的信度。
对 EBPI 的英文版本进行翻译、采用,并随后在全国性的在线调查中检验德语版 EBPI 的重测信度。邀请在德国工作的参与者两次完成问卷。对于每个 EBPI 维度,计算内部一致性信度(克朗巴赫α)和相对重测信度(组内相关系数,ICC)。测量误差的量化采用测量标准误差、一致性界限和最小可检测变化值。
建立了德语版的 EBPI。在在线调查中,EBPI 最初由 889 名医疗保健专业人员完成。在随访时,344 人(39%)完成了问卷(74%为女性;平均工作经验:13.6 年)。五个维度的 ICC 值在 0.78 到 0.86 之间。测量标准误差在各自维度量表范围的 6.5%到 8.8%之间变化,一致性界限在 24%到 37%之间变化。对于内部一致性信度,α值在 0.64 到 0.90 之间变化。既没有地板效应,也没有天花板效应,也没有其他相关的可行性问题。
德语版的 EBPI 可用于评估临床实践中医疗保健专业人员的 EBP 依从性,并识别 EBP 行为的障碍和促进因素。重测信度的结果表明,当用于组间比较时,EBPI 可以产生可靠的分数,但当用于随时间进行个体测量时,该问卷的可靠性似乎不足。应使用项目反应理论或 Rasch 测量理论的方法进一步评估和修订 EBPI,并根据本研究的结果进行改进。
德国临床试验注册(DRKS00013792)。注册于 2018 年 1 月 19 日。