Heizmann W, Werner H, Heilmann F
Abt. Med. Mikrobiologie, Hygiene-Institut der Universität, Tübingen.
Infection. 1988;16(1):63-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01646936.
The aim of automated susceptibility testing systems like the Cobas Bact is to provide the clinicians with rapid and reliable results for the care of patients and to decrease the work load in microbiological laboratories. Because data about accuracy on mezlocillin, azlocillin and ciprofloxacin were lacking, we investigated 184 bacterial strains and compared the results of the Cobas Bact susceptibility testing to standardized agar dilution and agar diffusion methods. Essential correlations for all methods compared exceeded 90% for the three chemotherapeutics and all species investigated, with the exception of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. On an average only 1.5% very major errors were observed with the several species of Enterobacteriaceae, whereas P. aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis were characterized by the complete absence of very major errors when Cobas Bact was correlated to NCCLS agar diffusion.
像Cobas Bact这样的自动化药敏试验系统的目的是为临床医生提供快速可靠的结果以照顾患者,并减少微生物实验室的工作量。由于缺乏关于美洛西林、阿洛西林和环丙沙星准确性的数据,我们研究了184株细菌菌株,并将Cobas Bact药敏试验的结果与标准化琼脂稀释法和琼脂扩散法进行了比较。除铜绿假单胞菌外,对于所研究的三种化疗药物和所有菌种,所有比较方法的基本相关性均超过90%。对于几种肠杆菌科菌种,平均仅观察到1.5%的极重大错误,而当将Cobas Bact与NCCLS琼脂扩散法进行对比时,铜绿假单胞菌和粪肠球菌的特点是完全没有极重大错误。