• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性菌通用药敏增强卡的评估。

Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card.

作者信息

Van Horn K G, Vandernoot A M, Burke E W, McKitrick J C

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):630-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.630-635.1984.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.20.4.630-635.1984
PMID:6490849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC271399/
Abstract

The MICs of 10 antimicrobial agents were determined for 1,000 clinical aerobic and facultatively anaerobic gram-negative bacilli by the 6-h AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card (GSC+) (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) and by an 18-h reference agar dilution method. Results obtained by both systems were evaluated for twofold dilution discrepancies and for interpretive category discrepancies. MICs that differed by more than one twofold dilution between the two test systems were considered to be discrepant. The overall twofold dilution agreement of the GSC+ MICs to agar dilution MICs was 94.0%. The agreement for each drug tested ranged from 91.7% (ampicillin and chloramphenicol) to 96.5% (carbenicillin). Interpretive categories were considered in agreement when the susceptibility interpretations obtained by the two systems were both very susceptible, moderately susceptible, or resistant. The overall interpretive category agreement was 80.5%. This agreement increased to 95.8% when all minor errors (moderately susceptible, one system; very susceptible, the other system) that would not affect therapy were omitted. The AutoMicrobic system GSC+ provides rapid and accurate susceptibility test results for clinical aerobic and facultatively anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.

摘要

采用6小时自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性通用药敏增强卡片(GSC +)(Vitek系统公司,密苏里州黑兹尔伍德)和18小时参考琼脂稀释法,对1000株临床需氧和兼性厌氧革兰氏阴性杆菌测定了10种抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。对两种系统获得的结果进行了两倍稀释差异和解释类别差异的评估。两种测试系统之间相差超过一个两倍稀释倍数的MIC被认为是有差异的。GSC +的MIC与琼脂稀释法MIC的总体两倍稀释一致性为94.0%。每种测试药物的一致性范围为91.7%(氨苄西林和氯霉素)至96.5%(羧苄西林)。当两种系统获得的药敏解释均为极敏感、中度敏感或耐药时,认为解释类别一致。总体解释类别一致性为80.5%。当所有不影响治疗的微小误差(一个系统为中度敏感,另一个系统为极敏感)被忽略时,该一致性提高到95.8%。自动微生物系统GSC +为临床需氧和兼性厌氧革兰氏阴性杆菌提供快速准确的药敏试验结果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card.自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性菌通用药敏增强卡的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):630-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.630-635.1984.
2
Comparison of the Cathra Repliscan II, the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card, and the Micro-Media System Fox Panel for dilution susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.用于革兰氏阴性杆菌稀释药敏试验的Cathra Repliscan II、自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性通用药敏增强卡和微媒体系统Fox鉴定板的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jun;21(6):959-62. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.6.959-962.1985.
3
Accuracy and reproducibility of the AutoMicrobic System Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card for testing selected challenge organisms.用于检测特定挑战微生物的自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性菌通用药敏增强卡的准确性和可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Sep;22(3):355-60. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.3.355-360.1985.
4
Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.自动微生物系统用于革兰氏阴性杆菌鉴定及药敏试验的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1053-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.6.1053-1059.1984.
5
Direct susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates with the AutoMicrobic System (AMS).使用自动微生物系统(AMS)对血培养分离株进行直接药敏试验。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1987 Sep;8(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90040-x.
6
Inability to adequately control antimicrobial agents on AutoMicrobic System Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Susceptibility Cards.无法在自动微生物系统革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性药敏卡上充分控制抗菌药物。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Mar;21(3):454-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.3.454-456.1985.
7
Comparison of two automated instrument systems for rapid susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.两种用于革兰氏阴性杆菌快速药敏试验的自动化仪器系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Dec;18(6):1301-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.6.1301-1309.1983.
8
Clinical evaluation of new AMS GSC plus card.新型AMS GSC plus卡的临床评估
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90043-3.
9
Comparison of five methods, including the PDM Epsilometer test (E test), for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.对包括纸片扩散法(PDM)Epsilometer试验(E试验)在内的五种方法进行比较,以检测铜绿假单胞菌的抗菌药敏性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2709-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2709-2713.1992.
10
Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides and gram-negative bacilli.自动微生物系统用于氨基糖苷类和革兰氏阴性杆菌药敏试验的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Mar;25(3):546-50. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.3.546-550.1987.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy and reproducibility of the AutoMicrobic System Gram-Negative General Susceptibility-Plus Card for testing selected challenge organisms.用于检测特定挑战微生物的自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性菌通用药敏增强卡的准确性和可重复性。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Sep;22(3):355-60. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.3.355-360.1985.
2
Comparative evaluation of four systems for determining susceptibility of gram-positive organisms.四种用于确定革兰氏阳性菌药敏性的系统的比较评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Apr;23(4):718-24. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.4.718-724.1986.
3
Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides and gram-negative bacilli.自动微生物系统用于氨基糖苷类和革兰氏阴性杆菌药敏试验的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Mar;25(3):546-50. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.3.546-550.1987.
4
Rapid MIC testing with the sensititre autoreader.使用Sensititre自动读数仪进行快速最低抑菌浓度(MIC)检测。
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jan;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.1.1-7.1988.
5
Evaluation of the Cobas Bact automated system for susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis to azlocillin, mezlocillin, and ciprofloxacin compared to NCCLS and DIN standards.将Cobas Bact自动化系统用于肠杆菌科细菌、铜绿假单胞菌和粪肠球菌对阿洛西林、美洛西林和环丙沙星的药敏试验评估,并与美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)和德国工业标准(DIN)标准进行比较。
Infection. 1988;16(1):63-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01646936.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical evaluation of automated antibiotic susceptibility testing with the MS-2 system.使用MS-2系统进行自动抗生素敏感性测试的临床评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):527-32. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.527-532.1980.
2
Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.三种革兰氏阴性杆菌抗菌药敏试验自动化系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):902-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.902-905.1982.
3
Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the automicrobic system: Enterobacteriaceae biochemical cards versus Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards.使用自动微生物系统鉴定肠杆菌科细菌:肠杆菌科生化鉴定卡与肠杆菌科加生化鉴定卡的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):575-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.575-581.1982.
4
Concurrent comparability of automated systems and commercially prepared microdilution trays for susceptibility testing.用于药敏试验的自动化系统与市售微量稀释板的同步可比性
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):878-86. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.5.878-886.1983.
5
Evaluation of the Sceptor microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing system: a collaborative investigation.Sceptor微量稀释法抗生素药敏试验系统的评估:一项合作研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):184-94. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.184-194.1981.
6
Clinical evaluation of new AMS GSC plus card.新型AMS GSC plus卡的临床评估
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90043-3.
7
Comparison of two automated instrument systems for rapid susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.两种用于革兰氏阴性杆菌快速药敏试验的自动化仪器系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Dec;18(6):1301-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.6.1301-1309.1983.
8
Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.一种快速自动药敏试验系统的实验室评估:一项合作研究报告
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):466-80. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.4.466.
9
Automated microbiological detection/identification system.自动化微生物检测/鉴定系统。
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):406-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.406-413.1977.