• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自第五版 CAGI 的报告:基因组解读的关键评估。

Reports from the fifth edition of CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation.

机构信息

Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California.

Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.

出版信息

Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1197-1201. doi: 10.1002/humu.23876. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1002/humu.23876
PMID:31334884
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7329230/
Abstract

Interpretation of genomic variation plays an essential role in the analysis of cancer and monogenic disease, and increasingly also in complex trait disease, with applications ranging from basic research to clinical decisions. Many computational impact prediction methods have been developed, yet the field lacks a clear consensus on their appropriate use and interpretation. The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI, /'kā-jē/) is a community experiment to objectively assess computational methods for predicting the phenotypic impacts of genomic variation. CAGI participants are provided genetic variants and make blind predictions of resulting phenotype. Independent assessors evaluate the predictions by comparing with experimental and clinical data. CAGI has completed five editions with the goals of establishing the state of art in genome interpretation and of encouraging new methodological developments. This special issue (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10981004/2019/40/9) comprises reports from CAGI, focusing on the fifth edition that culminated in a conference that took place 5 to 7 July 2018. CAGI5 was comprised of 14 challenges and engaged hundreds of participants from a dozen countries. This edition had a notable increase in splicing and expression regulatory variant challenges, while also continuing challenges on clinical genomics, as well as complex disease datasets and missense variants in diseases ranging from cancer to Pompe disease to schizophrenia. Full information about CAGI is at https://genomeinterpretation.org.

摘要

基因组变异的解读在癌症和单基因疾病的分析中起着至关重要的作用,而且在复杂性状疾病中的应用也越来越多,从基础研究到临床决策都有涉及。已经开发出许多计算影响预测方法,但该领域缺乏关于其适当使用和解释的明确共识。基因组解读的关键评估(CAGI,/'kā-jē/)是一个社区实验,旨在客观评估预测基因组变异对表型影响的计算方法。CAGI 参与者提供遗传变异,并对由此产生的表型进行盲目的预测。独立评估者通过将预测结果与实验和临床数据进行比较来评估预测结果。CAGI 已经完成了五轮,其目标是建立基因组解读的最新技术,并鼓励新的方法学发展。 本特刊(https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10981004/2019/40/9)包含了来自 CAGI 的报告,重点介绍了于 2018 年 7 月 5 日至 7 日举行的第五届会议达到高潮的 CAGI。CAGI5 由 14 个挑战组成,吸引了来自十几个国家的数百名参与者。这一版在剪接和表达调控变异挑战方面有显著增加,同时也继续在临床基因组学、复杂疾病数据集以及从癌症到庞贝病到精神分裂症等疾病的错义变异方面具有挑战性。有关 CAGI 的详细信息,请访问 https://genomeinterpretation.org。

相似文献

1
Reports from the fifth edition of CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation.来自第五版 CAGI 的报告:基因组解读的关键评估。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1197-1201. doi: 10.1002/humu.23876. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
2
CAGI, the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, establishes progress and prospects for computational genetic variant interpretation methods.CAGI,即基因组解读的关键评估,旨在评估计算遗传变异解读方法的进展和前景。
Genome Biol. 2024 Feb 22;25(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-03113-6.
3
Assessing predictions of the impact of variants on splicing in CAGI5.评估 CAGI5 中变异对剪接影响的预测。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1215-1224. doi: 10.1002/humu.23869. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
Are machine learning based methods suited to address complex biological problems? Lessons from CAGI-5 challenges.基于机器学习的方法是否适合解决复杂的生物学问题?来自 CAGI-5 挑战赛的经验教训。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1455-1462. doi: 10.1002/humu.23784. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
PON-P and PON-P2 predictor performance in CAGI challenges: Lessons learned.在CAGI挑战中PON-P和PON-P2预测器的性能:经验教训。
Hum Mutat. 2017 Sep;38(9):1085-1091. doi: 10.1002/humu.23199. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
CAGI 5 splicing challenge: Improved exon skipping and intron retention predictions with MMSplice.CAGI5 剪接挑战:MMSplice 提高外显子跳跃和内含子保留预测的性能。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1243-1251. doi: 10.1002/humu.23788. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
CAGI SickKids challenges: Assessment of phenotype and variant predictions derived from clinical and genomic data of children with undiagnosed diseases.CAGI SickKids 挑战:评估患有不明原因疾病的儿童的临床和基因组数据中得出的表型和变异预测。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1373-1391. doi: 10.1002/humu.23874. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
8
Objective assessment of the evolutionary action equation for the fitness effect of missense mutations across CAGI-blinded contests.对跨CAGI盲测的错义突变适应性效应的进化作用方程进行客观评估。
Hum Mutat. 2017 Sep;38(9):1072-1084. doi: 10.1002/humu.23266. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
9
Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: trends from three decades of genetic variant impact predictors.变异影响预测器数据库(VIPdb),版本 2:三十年来遗传变异影响预测器的趋势。
Hum Genomics. 2024 Aug 28;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00663-z.
10
Working toward precision medicine: Predicting phenotypes from exomes in the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) challenges.迈向精准医学:在基因组解读关键评估(CAGI)挑战中从外显子组预测表型
Hum Mutat. 2017 Sep;38(9):1182-1192. doi: 10.1002/humu.23280. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic prediction with kinship-based multiple kernel learning produces hypothesis on the underlying inheritance mechanisms of phenotypic traits.基于亲缘关系的多核学习进行基因组预测,能够对表型性状的潜在遗传机制提出假设。
Genome Biol. 2025 Apr 4;26(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03544-3.
2
Meta-EA: a gene-specific combination of available computational tools for predicting missense variant effects.Meta-EA:一种用于预测错义变异效应的现有计算工具的基因特异性组合。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 2;16(1):159. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55066-4.
3
Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: trends from three decades of genetic variant impact predictors.变异影响预测器数据库(VIPdb),版本 2:三十年来遗传变异影响预测器的趋势。
Hum Genomics. 2024 Aug 28;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00663-z.
4
Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: Trends from 25 years of genetic variant impact predictors.变异影响预测数据库(VIPdb),版本2:25年基因变异影响预测的趋势
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 28:2024.06.25.600283. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.25.600283.
5
Biologically meaningful genome interpretation models to address data underdetermination for the leaf and seed ionome prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana.用于解决拟南芥叶和种子离子组预测中数据不足问题的具有生物学意义的基因组解释模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 8;14(1):13188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63855-6.
6
FiTMuSiC: leveraging structural and (co)evolutionary data for protein fitness prediction.FiTMuSiC:利用结构和(共)进化数据进行蛋白质适合度预测。
Hum Genomics. 2024 Apr 16;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00605-9.
7
CAGI, the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, establishes progress and prospects for computational genetic variant interpretation methods.CAGI,即基因组解读的关键评估,旨在评估计算遗传变异解读方法的进展和前景。
Genome Biol. 2024 Feb 22;25(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-03113-6.
8
ProSTAGE: Predicting Effects of Mutations on Protein Stability by Using Protein Embeddings and Graph Convolutional Networks.ProSTAGE:利用蛋白质嵌入和图卷积网络预测突变对蛋白质稳定性的影响。
J Chem Inf Model. 2024 Jan 22;64(2):340-347. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01697. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
9
FUS G559A Mutation in a Patient with a Frontotemporal Dementia-Motor Neuron Disease Compatible Syndrome: A Case Report.一例患有额颞叶痴呆-运动神经元病综合征患者的FUS G559A突变:病例报告
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2023 Oct 9;7(1):1121-1126. doi: 10.3233/ADR-230103. eCollection 2023.
10
Evaluation of crowdsourced mortality prediction models as a framework for assessing artificial intelligence in medicine.评估众包死亡率预测模型作为评估医学人工智能的框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):35-44. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad159.

本文引用的文献

1
Matching whole genomes to rare genetic disorders: Identification of potential causative variants using phenotype-weighted knowledge in the CAGI SickKids5 clinical genomes challenge.将全基因组与罕见遗传疾病相匹配:在 CAGI SickKids5 临床基因组挑战中使用表型加权知识鉴定潜在的致病变异。
Hum Mutat. 2020 Feb;41(2):347-362. doi: 10.1002/humu.23933. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
2
Assessment of predicted enzymatic activity of α-N-acetylglucosaminidase variants of unknown significance for CAGI 2016.评估未知意义的 α-N-乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶变异体的预测酶活性,用于 CAGI 2016。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1519-1529. doi: 10.1002/humu.23875.
3
CAGI SickKids challenges: Assessment of phenotype and variant predictions derived from clinical and genomic data of children with undiagnosed diseases.CAGI SickKids 挑战:评估患有不明原因疾病的儿童的临床和基因组数据中得出的表型和变异预测。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1373-1391. doi: 10.1002/humu.23874. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
CAGI5: Objective performance assessments of predictions based on the Evolutionary Action equation.CAGI5:基于进化作用方程的预测的客观性能评估。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1436-1454. doi: 10.1002/humu.23873. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
5
Assessing computational predictions of the phenotypic effect of cystathionine-beta-synthase variants.评估胱硫醚-β-合酶变异体表型效应的计算预测。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1530-1545. doi: 10.1002/humu.23868. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
6
Assessing predictions of the impact of variants on splicing in CAGI5.评估 CAGI5 中变异对剪接影响的预测。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1215-1224. doi: 10.1002/humu.23869. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
7
Future directions for high-throughput splicing assays in precision medicine.高通量剪接分析在精准医学中的未来方向。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1225-1234. doi: 10.1002/humu.23866. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
8
Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.评估 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异的临床意义的盲法预测。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1546-1556. doi: 10.1002/humu.23861. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
9
Assessing predictions on fitness effects of missense variants in calmodulin.评估钙调蛋白中错义变异体对适应度影响的预测。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1463-1473. doi: 10.1002/humu.23857. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
10
VIPdb, a genetic Variant Impact Predictor Database.VIPdb,一个遗传变异影响预测数据库。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep;40(9):1202-1214. doi: 10.1002/humu.23858. Epub 2019 Aug 17.