• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从模式分类到分层:走向自闭症谱系障碍异质性的概念化。

From pattern classification to stratification: towards conceptualizing the heterogeneity of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

机构信息

Donders Center for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department for Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Donders Center for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department for Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Sep;104:240-254. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.010
PMID:31330196
Abstract

Pattern classification and stratification approaches have increasingly been used in research on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) over the last ten years with the goal of translation towards clinical applicability. Here, we present an extensive scoping literature review on those two approaches. We screened a total of 635 studies, of which 57 pattern classification and 19 stratification studies were included. We observed large variance across pattern classification studies in terms of predictive performance from about 60% to 98% accuracy, which is among other factors likely linked to sampling bias, different validation procedures across studies, the heterogeneity of ASD and differences in data quality. Stratification studies were less prevalent with only two studies reporting replications and just a few showing external validation. While some identified strata based on cognition and intelligence reappear across studies, biology as a stratification marker is clearly underexplored. In summary, mapping biological differences at the level of the individual with ASD is a major challenge for the field now. Conceptualizing those mappings and individual trajectories that lead to the diagnosis of ASD, will become a major challenge in the near future.

摘要

在过去十年中,模式分类和分层方法在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的研究中越来越多地被使用,目的是转化为临床适用性。在这里,我们对这两种方法进行了广泛的文献综述。我们总共筛选了 635 项研究,其中包括 57 项模式分类研究和 19 项分层研究。我们观察到模式分类研究在预测性能方面存在很大差异,准确性从约 60%到 98%不等,这可能与采样偏差、不同研究之间的验证程序、ASD 的异质性以及数据质量的差异有关。分层研究则不太常见,只有两项研究报告了重复,只有少数研究显示了外部验证。虽然一些研究根据认知和智力确定了重复出现的分层,但生物标志物作为分层标记显然还没有得到充分探索。总之,在个体层面上绘制自闭症的生物学差异是该领域目前面临的一个主要挑战。将这些映射和导致自闭症诊断的个体轨迹概念化,将成为不久的将来的一个主要挑战。

相似文献

1
From pattern classification to stratification: towards conceptualizing the heterogeneity of Autism Spectrum Disorder.从模式分类到分层:走向自闭症谱系障碍异质性的概念化。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Sep;104:240-254. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
2
The EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project (LEAP): design and methodologies to identify and validate stratification biomarkers for autism spectrum disorders.欧盟孤独症干预、监测与服务的长期欧洲项目(LEAP):识别和验证孤独症谱系障碍分层生物标志物的设计与方法
Mol Autism. 2017 Jun 23;8:24. doi: 10.1186/s13229-017-0146-8. eCollection 2017.
3
Common and unique multimodal covarying patterns in autism spectrum disorder subtypes.自闭症谱系障碍亚型中常见和独特的多模态共变模式。
Mol Autism. 2020 Nov 18;11(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00397-4.
4
Improving the detection of autism spectrum disorder by combining structural and functional MRI information.结合结构和功能磁共振成像信息提高自闭症谱系障碍的检测。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;25:102181. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102181. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
5
The neuroanatomy of autism spectrum disorder: An overview of structural neuroimaging findings and their translatability to the clinical setting.自闭症谱系障碍的神经解剖学:结构性神经影像学研究结果概述及其临床应用的可转化性。
Autism. 2017 Jan;21(1):18-28. doi: 10.1177/1362361315627136. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
6
Autism spectrum disorder risk prediction: A systematic review of behavioral and neural investigations.自闭症谱系障碍风险预测:行为和神经研究的系统综述。
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2020;173:91-137. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 May 8.
7
Using Pattern Classification to Identify Brain Imaging Markers in Autism Spectrum Disorder.利用模式分类识别自闭症谱系障碍中的脑成像标志物。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2018;40:413-436. doi: 10.1007/7854_2018_47.
8
Brain imaging-based machine learning in autism spectrum disorder: methods and applications.基于脑影像的自闭症谱系障碍机器学习:方法与应用。
J Neurosci Methods. 2021 Sep 1;361:109271. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109271. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
9
Distributed Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Patterns Predict Diagnostic Status in Large Autism Cohort.分布式内源性功能连接模式可预测大型自闭症队列的诊断状态。
Brain Connect. 2017 Oct;7(8):515-525. doi: 10.1089/brain.2017.0496.
10
Quantitative assessment of brain structural abnormalities in children with autism spectrum disorder based on artificial intelligence automatic brain segmentation technology and machine learning methods.基于人工智能自动脑分割技术和机器学习方法对自闭症谱系障碍儿童脑结构异常进行定量评估。
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2024 Dec;345:111901. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111901. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
How Technology Advances Research and Practice in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Narrative Review on Early Detection, Subtype Stratification, and Intervention.技术如何推动自闭症谱系障碍的研究与实践:关于早期检测、亚型分层和干预的叙述性综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):890. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080890.
2
Predicting Developmental Norms from Baseline Cortical Thickness in Longitudinal Studies.在纵向研究中根据基线皮质厚度预测发育规范
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 28:2025.07.11.664301. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.664301.
3
A computational cognitive neuroscience approach for characterizing individual differences in autism: Introduction to Special Issue.
一种用于刻画自闭症个体差异的计算认知神经科学方法:特刊引言
Personal Neurosci. 2025 Apr 10;8:e2. doi: 10.1017/pen.2025.2. eCollection 2025.
4
A Framework for Comparison and Interpretation of Machine Learning Classifiers to Predict Autism on the ABIDE Dataset.用于在ABIDE数据集上预测自闭症的机器学习分类器比较与解释框架。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Apr 1;46(5):e70190. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70190.
5
The Untapped Potential of Dimension Reduction in Neuroimaging: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multimodal Analysis of Long COVID Fatigue.神经影像学降维的未开发潜力:人工智能驱动的长期新冠疲劳多模态分析
Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 29;14(12):1209. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121209.
6
Delineating a Pathway for the Discovery of Functional Connectome Biomarkers of Autism.自闭症功能连接组生物标志物发现途径的描绘。
Adv Neurobiol. 2024;40:511-544. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_18.
7
Heterogeneity and convergence across seven neuroimaging modalities: a review of the autism spectrum disorder literature.七种神经影像学模态的异质性与趋同性:自闭症谱系障碍文献综述
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 16;15:1474003. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474003. eCollection 2024.
8
Generalizable and transportable resting-state neural signatures characterized by functional networks, neurotransmitters, and clinical symptoms in autism.以功能网络、神经递质和临床症状为特征的可推广且可转移的自闭症静息态神经特征。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;30(4):1466-1478. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02759-3. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
9
Symptom dimensions of resting-state electroencephalographic functional connectivity in autism.自闭症静息态脑电图功能连接的症状维度
Nat Ment Health. 2024 Mar;2(3):287-298. doi: 10.1038/s44220-023-00195-w. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
10
Virtual reality gameplay classification illustrates the multidimensionality of visuospatial neglect.虚拟现实游戏玩法分类说明了视觉空间忽视的多维度性。
Brain Commun. 2024 May 3;6(4):fcae145. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae145. eCollection 2024.