Mertens Gaëtan, Krypotos Angelos-Miltiadis
Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL.
Leuven Research Group on Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, BE.
Psychol Belg. 2019 Aug 22;59(1):338-352. doi: 10.5334/pb.493.
The preregistration of a study's hypotheses, methods, and data-analyses steps is becoming a popular psychological research practice. To date, most of the discussion on study preregistration has focused on the preregistration of studies that include the collection of original data. However, much of the research in psychology relies on the (re-)analysis of preexisting data. Importantly, this type of studies is different from original studies as researchers cannot change major aspects of the study (e.g., experimental manipulations, sample size). Here, we provide arguments as to why it is useful to preregister analyses of preexisting data, discuss practical considerations, consider potential concerns, and introduce a preregistration template tailored for studies focused on the analyses of preexisting data. We argue that the preregistration of hypotheses and data-analyses for analyses of preexisting data is an important step towards more transparent psychological research.
对研究的假设、方法和数据分析步骤进行预先注册正成为一种流行的心理学研究实践。迄今为止,关于研究预先注册的大部分讨论都集中在包括原始数据收集的研究的预先注册上。然而,心理学中的许多研究都依赖于对现有数据的(重新)分析。重要的是,这类研究与原始研究不同,因为研究人员无法改变研究的主要方面(例如,实验操作、样本量)。在此,我们阐述了对现有数据的分析进行预先注册为何有用的论据,讨论了实际考量因素,考虑了潜在问题,并介绍了一个为专注于现有数据分析的研究量身定制的预先注册模板。我们认为,对现有数据的分析进行假设和数据分析的预先注册是迈向更透明的心理学研究的重要一步。