• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类-人类与人类-机器人联合行动中的主体感。

The sense of agency in human-human vs human-robot joint action.

机构信息

Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique, ISIR, Paris, France.

ONERA, The French Aerospace Lab, Département Traitement de l'Information et Systèmes, Salon-de-Provence, France.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2019 Oct;75:102820. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102820. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102820
PMID:31561189
Abstract

Kinesthesis pertains to the perception of moving body parts, while the sense of agency refers to the experience of controlling one's action-effects. Based on previous work, we hypothesized that the sense of agency would decrease in joint action with a robot compared to a human partner. Pairs of participants were jointly manipulating two interconnected haptic devices enabling them to feel each other's forces. Unbeknown to participants, their partner was sometimes replaced by a robot. The sense of agency was assessed using intentional binding, which refers to a contraction of perceived time between an action and its effect for intentional actions, and participants' judgment of their contribution to joint action. Participants judged their contribution as higher when they were initiating action and when they were paired with the robot. By contrast, intentional binding occurred only with a human partner. This outcome supports the hypothesis that human-robot joint action hinders intentional binding.

摘要

动觉是指对运动中身体部位的感知,而主体感是指对自身动作效果的控制体验。基于先前的研究,我们假设在与机器人进行联合动作时,主体感会比与人类伙伴进行联合动作时降低。参与者成对地操作两个相互连接的触觉设备,使他们能够感受到彼此的力量。参与者不知道的是,有时他们的伙伴会被机器人取代。主体感是通过意图绑定来评估的,它是指对有意动作的动作和效果之间感知时间的收缩,以及参与者对自己在联合动作中的贡献的判断。当参与者发起动作并与机器人配对时,他们会认为自己的贡献更高。相比之下,只有在与人类伙伴一起时才会发生意图绑定。这一结果支持了这样一种假设,即人机联合动作会阻碍意图绑定。

相似文献

1
The sense of agency in human-human vs human-robot joint action.人类-人类与人类-机器人联合行动中的主体感。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Oct;75:102820. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102820. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
2
Attribution of intentional agency towards robots reduces one's own sense of agency.将意向性归因于机器人会降低个体的自身主体感。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104109. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104109. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
3
When robots tell you what to do: Sense of agency in human- and robot-guided actions.当机器人告诉你该怎么做:人为和机器人引导的动作中的代理感。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Oct;75:102819. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102819. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
4
Intentions with actions: The role of intentionality attribution on the vicarious sense of agency in Human-Robot interaction.意图与行为:意向归因在人机交互中的代理感中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Apr;75(4):616-632. doi: 10.1177/17470218211042003. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
5
The influence of action-outcome delay and arousal on sense of agency and the intentional binding effect.动作-结果延迟和唤醒对 agency 感及意图绑定效应的影响。 (注:这里“agency”在心理学等领域有特定含义,可译为“能动感”等,具体可根据上下文进一步确定准确表述)
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
6
When performing actions with robots, attribution of intentionality affects the sense of joint agency.当与机器人一起执行动作时,意图的归因会影响共同代理的感觉。
Sci Robot. 2024 Jun 26;9(91):eadj3665. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.adj3665.
7
Social exclusion reduces the sense of agency: Evidence from intentional binding.社会排斥会降低主体感:来自意向绑定的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 May;71:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action.共同动作中的主体感和意向绑定。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2675-2. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
9
Mutual coordination strengthens the sense of joint agency in cooperative joint action.相互协调增强了合作性联合行动中的共同能动性意识。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Nov;46:173-187. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
10
Sense of agency in joint action: influence of human and computer co-actors.共同动作中的主体感:人与计算机共同作用者的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):663-70. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2662-7. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-other distinction modulates the sense of self-agency during joint actions.自我-他人区分在联合行动中调节自我能动性的感觉。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80880-7.
2
The time course of Temporal Binding in social and nonsocial interactions.社交与非社交互动中时间绑定的时间进程。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):326-341. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02540-1. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
3
Motor Learning in Robot-Based Haptic Dyads: A Review.基于机器人的触觉二元组中的运动学习:综述
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2024 Oct-Dec;17(4):510-527. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2024.3379035. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Sense of agency in joint action: a critical review of we-agency.联合行动中的 agency 感:对“我们的能动性”的批判性综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 31;15:1331084. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331084. eCollection 2024.
5
What is new with Artificial Intelligence? Human-agent interactions through the lens of social agency.人工智能有哪些新进展?从社会能动性视角看人与智能体的交互。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:954444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954444. eCollection 2022.
6
Temporal binding of social events less pronounced in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍个体的社会事件时间绑定不明显。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 1;12(1):14853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19309-y.
7
Human-likeness and attribution of intentionality predict vicarious sense of agency over humanoid robot actions.类人性和意图归因预测对人形机器人动作的代理感。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 16;12(1):13845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18151-6.
8
Social Action Effects: Representing Predicted Partner Responses in Social Interactions.社会行动效应:在社会互动中呈现预测的伙伴反应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 2;16:837495. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.837495. eCollection 2022.
9
Temporal binding is enhanced in social contexts.时间绑定在社交情境中增强。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct;28(5):1545-1555. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01928-7. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Embodied Cooperation to Promote Forgiving Interactions With Autonomous Machines.通过具身合作促进与自主机器的宽容互动。
Front Neurorobot. 2021 Apr 9;15:661603. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.661603. eCollection 2021.