Kim Man Soo, Cho Ryu Kyoung, In Yong
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17386. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017386.
The purpose of this study was to use meta-analysis techniques to evaluate the efficacy and safety of polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) injections for knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment.
Multiple comprehensive databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched in November 2018 for studies that compared the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular PDRN injection for the knee joint with hyaluronic acid (HA) injection. Two reviewers independently determined study inclusion and they extracted data using a standardized data extraction form. The predefined primary outcome was Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary outcomes included Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and adverse events.
Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. After 1 and 2 months, patients in the PDRN group showed significantly better improvement in pain than the HA group (P = .04 and P = .02, respectively). There was no significant difference in pain after 4 months. The pooled analysis showed that no significant differences were seen in function (KOOS and KSS) scores between the PDRN and HA groups (all P > .05) at all time points. There was no significant difference in adverse events between 2 groups (relative risks = 2.15, 95% confidential interval: 0.17-26.67, P = .55).
The intra-articular use of PDRN was similar in function to HA, and the pain-relief effect was superior to HA for 2 months post-injection. Therefore, it could be a favorable alternative to HA to treat persistent pain associated with knee OA while avoiding side effects.Level of evidence I.
本研究旨在运用荟萃分析技术评估聚脱氧核糖核苷酸(PDRN)注射治疗膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的疗效和安全性。
2018年11月检索了多个综合数据库,包括MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,以查找比较关节内注射PDRN与透明质酸(HA)治疗膝关节有效性和安全性的研究。两名 reviewers 独立确定纳入研究,并使用标准化数据提取表提取数据。预定义的主要结局是视觉模拟评分。次要结局包括膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)、膝关节协会评分(KSS)和不良事件。
荟萃分析纳入了五项随机对照试验。在1个月和2个月后,PDRN组患者的疼痛改善明显优于HA组(分别为P = 0.04和P = 0.02)。4个月后疼痛无显著差异。汇总分析表明,在所有时间点,PDRN组和HA组之间的功能(KOOS和KSS)评分均无显著差异(所有P>0.05)。两组之间的不良事件无显著差异(相对风险 = 2.15,95%置信区间:0.17 - 26.67,P = 0.55)。
关节内使用PDRN在功能上与HA相似,且注射后2个月的止痛效果优于HA。因此,它可能是治疗膝关节OA相关持续性疼痛同时避免副作用的HA的良好替代方案。证据等级I。