Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology & Economics (PTE2), Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Disease Prevention and Control Division, Banggai Laut Regency Health, Population Control and Family Planning Service, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia (Bidang Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Penyakit, Dinas Kesehatan, Pengendalian Penduduk & Keluarga Berencana, Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Banggai Laut, Jl. Jogugu Zakaria No. 1, Banggai, Sulawesi Tengah, Indonesia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4515-1.
The number of people living with diabetes mellitus (DM) in Indonesia has continued to increase over the last 6 years. Four previous studies in U.S have found that higher DD scores were associated with worse psychological outcomes, lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and increased risk of T2DM complications. In this study, we aimed to firstly compare DD scores in Indonesian T2DM outpatients treated in primary care versus those in tertiary care. Subsequently, we investigated whether socio-demographic characteristics and clinical conditions explain potential differences in DD score across healthcare settings.
A cross-sectional study was conducted on Java island in three primary care (n = 108) and four tertiary care (n = 524) facilities. The participants completed the Bahasa Indonesia version of the Diabetes Distress Scale questionnaire (DDS17 Bahasa Indonesia). Ordinal regression analysis was conducted with the quartile of the summation of the DD score as the dependent variable to investigate how the association between the level of healthcare facilities and DD altered when adding different variables in the model.
The final adjusted model showed that the level of healthcare facilities was strongly associated with DD (p < .001), with participants in primary care having a 3.68 times (95% CI 2.46-5.55) higher likelihood of being more distressed than the participants in tertiary care. This association was detected after including the socio-demographic characteristics and clinical conditions as model confounders.
This is the first study in Indonesia to compare DD scores within different healthcare facilities. We recommend a regular DD assessment, possibly closely aligned with health-literacy partner programs, especially for T2DM patients in primary care settings.
过去 6 年来,印度尼西亚的糖尿病患者人数持续增加。四项美国之前的研究发现,较高的 DD 评分与较差的心理结局、较低的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和 2 型糖尿病并发症风险增加有关。在这项研究中,我们首先比较了在初级保健和三级保健中接受治疗的印度尼西亚 2 型糖尿病门诊患者的 DD 评分。随后,我们调查了社会人口统计学特征和临床状况是否可以解释医疗保健环境中 DD 评分的潜在差异。
在爪哇岛的三个初级保健机构(n=108)和四个三级保健机构(n=524)进行了横断面研究。参与者完成了印尼语版的糖尿病困扰量表问卷(DDS17 印尼语版)。使用 DD 评分总和的四分位作为因变量进行有序回归分析,以调查当模型中添加不同变量时,医疗保健设施水平与 DD 之间的关联如何改变。
最终调整后的模型表明,医疗保健设施的水平与 DD 密切相关(p<0.001),与三级保健机构的参与者相比,初级保健机构的参与者出现困扰的可能性高 3.68 倍(95%CI 2.46-5.55)。在将社会人口统计学特征和临床状况作为模型混杂因素纳入后,仍可检测到这种关联。
这是印度尼西亚首次在不同医疗保健机构内比较 DD 评分的研究。我们建议定期进行 DD 评估,可能与健康素养伙伴计划密切结合,特别是针对初级保健环境中的 2 型糖尿病患者。