• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习预测初级保健中的心房颤动。

Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning.

机构信息

Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Ltd, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.

Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 1;14(11):e0224582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224582. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0224582
PMID:31675367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6824570/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained heart arrhythmia. However, as many cases are asymptomatic, a large proportion of patients remain undiagnosed until serious complications arise. Efficient, cost-effective detection of the undiagnosed may be supported by risk-prediction models relating patient factors to AF risk. However, there exists a need for an implementable risk model that is contemporaneous and informed by routinely collected patient data, reflecting the real-world pathology of AF.

METHODS

This study sought to develop and evaluate novel and conventional statistical and machine learning models for risk-predication of AF. This was a retrospective, cohort study of adults (aged ≥30 years) without a history of AF, listed on the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, from January 2006 to December 2016. Models evaluated included published risk models (Framingham, ARIC, CHARGE-AF), machine learning models, which evaluated baseline and time-updated information (neural network, LASSO, random forests, support vector machines), and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Analysis of 2,994,837 individuals (3.2% AF) identified time-varying neural networks as the optimal model achieving an AUROC of 0.827 vs. 0.725, with number needed to screen of 9 vs. 13 patients at 75% sensitivity, when compared with the best existing model CHARGE-AF. The optimal model confirmed known baseline risk factors (age, previous cardiovascular disease, antihypertensive medication usage) and identified additional time-varying predictors (proximity of cardiovascular events, body mass index (both levels and changes), pulse pressure, and the frequency of blood pressure measurements).

CONCLUSION

The optimal time-varying machine learning model exhibited greater predictive performance than existing AF risk models and reflected known and new patient risk factors for AF.

摘要

背景

心房颤动(AF)是最常见的持续性心律失常。然而,由于许多病例无症状,很大一部分患者在出现严重并发症之前未被诊断。通过将患者因素与 AF 风险相关联的风险预测模型,可以有效地、具有成本效益地检测未被诊断的病例。然而,需要有一种可实施的风险模型,该模型与常规收集的患者数据相关联,反映 AF 的真实病理,并具有时效性。

方法

本研究旨在开发和评估用于预测 AF 风险的新型和传统统计及机器学习模型。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2006 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间 Clinical Practice Research Datalink 中无 AF 病史的成年人(年龄≥30 岁)。评估的模型包括已发表的风险模型(Framingham、ARIC、CHARGE-AF)、机器学习模型,这些模型评估了基线和时间更新信息(神经网络、LASSO、随机森林、支持向量机)和 Cox 回归。

结果

对 2994837 名个体(3.2%的 AF)进行分析,发现时变神经网络是最佳模型,其 AUC 为 0.827,优于最佳现有模型 CHARGE-AF 的 0.725,当灵敏度为 75%时,所需的筛查人数为 9 人,而不是 13 人。最佳模型证实了已知的基线风险因素(年龄、既往心血管疾病、降压药物使用),并确定了其他时变预测因素(心血管事件的临近、体重指数(水平和变化)、脉压和血压测量的频率)。

结论

最佳时变机器学习模型的预测性能优于现有的 AF 风险模型,并反映了 AF 的已知和新的患者风险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79f/6824570/18ac4aff2b64/pone.0224582.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79f/6824570/cf60b1be75be/pone.0224582.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79f/6824570/18ac4aff2b64/pone.0224582.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79f/6824570/cf60b1be75be/pone.0224582.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c79f/6824570/18ac4aff2b64/pone.0224582.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning.利用机器学习预测初级保健中的心房颤动。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 1;14(11):e0224582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224582. eCollection 2019.
2
Assessment of a Machine Learning Model Applied to Harmonized Electronic Health Record Data for the Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation.应用于电子健康记录数据标准化的机器学习模型预测心房颤动事件的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919396. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19396.
3
Evaluation of Risk Prediction Models of Atrial Fibrillation (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA]).房颤风险预测模型的评估(来自动脉粥样硬化多民族研究[MESA])。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;125(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.09.032. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
4
Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using a machine learning risk prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI) in primary care: cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy evaluated in a randomized controlled trial in England.利用机器学习风险预测算法和诊断测试(PULsE-AI)在初级保健中识别未诊断的心房颤动:在英格兰进行的一项随机对照试验中评估的筛查策略的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):974-983. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2102355.
5
Cost-effectiveness of targeted screening for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation: evaluation of a machine learning risk prediction algorithm.基于机器学习风险预测算法的心房颤动患者靶向筛查的成本效益评估。
J Med Econ. 2020 Apr;23(4):386-393. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1706543. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Development, validation, and proof-of-concept implementation of a two-year risk prediction model for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using common electronic health data (UNAFIED).使用常见电子健康数据(UNAFIED)开发、验证和概念验证实施一种用于未诊断心房颤动的两年风险预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Apr 3;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01482-1.
7
Machine learning-based identification of risk-factor signatures for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in primary prevention and post-stroke in clinical practice.基于机器学习的临床实践中未诊断的心房颤动一级预防和卒中后风险因素特征的识别。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Dec 13;9(1):16-23. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac013.
8
Precise risk-prediction model including arterial stiffness for new-onset atrial fibrillation using machine learning techniques.利用机器学习技术建立包含动脉僵硬度的新发心房颤动精确预测模型。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Jul;26(7):806-815. doi: 10.1111/jch.14848. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
9
Prediction model for thyrotoxic atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study.甲状腺功能亢进性心房颤动预测模型:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Jul 11;21(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00809-3.
10
Machine learning does not improve upon traditional regression in predicting outcomes in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the ORBIT-AF and GARFIELD-AF registries.机器学习在预测心房颤动结局方面并未优于传统回归分析:对 ORBIT-AF 和 GARFIELD-AF 注册研究的分析。
Europace. 2020 Nov 1;22(11):1635-1644. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa172.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure classification from medical student notes following simulated patient encounters.根据模拟患者问诊后的医学生记录预测纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心力衰竭分级
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25491. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10179-8.
2
The Use of Machine Learning for Analyzing Real-World Data in Disease Prediction and Management: Systematic Review.机器学习在疾病预测与管理中分析真实世界数据的应用:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 19;13:e68898. doi: 10.2196/68898.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Atrial Fibrillation: From Early Detection to Precision Therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Using a machine learning approach to predict outcome after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.使用机器学习方法预测退行性颈椎脊髓病手术后的结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0215133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215133. eCollection 2019.
2
Predicting the risk of emergency admission with machine learning: Development and validation using linked electronic health records.使用机器学习预测急诊入院风险:基于电子健康记录的开发和验证。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002695. eCollection 2018 Nov.
3
Machine learning models in electronic health records can outperform conventional survival models for predicting patient mortality in coronary artery disease.
心房颤动中的人工智能:从早期检测到精准治疗
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 11;14(8):2627. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082627.
4
Optimising test intervals for individuals with type 2 diabetes: A machine learning approach.优化2型糖尿病患者的检测间隔:一种机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0317722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317722. eCollection 2025.
5
The Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence in the Detection and Management of Atrial Fibrillation.人工智能在心房颤动检测与管理中的功效
Cureus. 2025 Jan 8;17(1):e77135. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77135. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Machine learning based prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk using electronic health records data: systematic review and meta-analysis.基于机器学习利用电子健康记录数据预测心血管疾病风险的模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Oct 27;6(1):7-22. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae080. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Medical history predicts phenome-wide disease onset and enables the rapid response to emerging health threats.病史可预测全表型疾病的发病情况,并能对新出现的健康威胁做出快速反应。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 10;16(1):585. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-55879-x.
8
Machine learning for outcome prediction in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from the GLORIA-AF registry.基于 GLORIA-AF 注册研究的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者结局预测的机器学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 7;14(1):27088. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78120-z.
9
Comparing Machine Learning and Advanced Methods with Traditional Methods to Generate Weights in Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: The INFORM Study.比较机器学习和先进方法与传统方法在处理加权逆概率中生成权重的情况:INFORM研究。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2024 Oct 4;15:173-183. doi: 10.2147/POR.S466505. eCollection 2024.
10
The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: From Detection to Treatment.人工智能在心房颤动患者中的应用:从检测到治疗
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 10;25(7):257. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2507257. eCollection 2024 Jul.
机器学习模型在电子健康记录中可以优于传统的生存模型,用于预测冠心病患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 31;13(8):e0202344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202344. eCollection 2018.
4
Performing studies using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink: to link or not to link?使用英国临床实践研究数据库进行研究:链接还是不链接?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;33(6):601-605. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0389-5. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Screening for atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLAECE).心房颤动筛查:一份由心律协会(HRS)、亚太心律协会(APHRS)和拉丁美洲心脏刺激与电生理学会(SOLAECE)认可的欧洲心律协会(EHRA)共识文件
Europace. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1589-1623. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux177.
6
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家发病率、患病率以及 195 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2016 年 328 种疾病和伤害导致的残疾年数:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2.
7
Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?机器学习能否利用常规临床数据改善心血管疾病风险预测?
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 4;12(4):e0174944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174944. eCollection 2017.
8
2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS.2016年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 7;37(38):2893-2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
9
Machine Learning in Medicine.医学中的机器学习
Circulation. 2015 Nov 17;132(20):1920-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593.
10
Accuracy of methods for detecting an irregular pulse and suspected atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.检测不规则脉搏和疑似心房颤动方法的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Aug;23(12):1330-8. doi: 10.1177/2047487315611347. Epub 2015 Oct 13.