DONALD Study Center Dortmund, IEL-Nutritional Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Dortmund, Germany.
Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Eur J Nutr. 2020 Oct;59(7):3163-3169. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-02154-7. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
Salt reduction campaigns without a parallel increase of iodine fortification will lead to a worsened iodine status in countries with a relevant salt iodization. A decline in iodine supply bears the risk of higher prevalences of goiter, thyroid nodules, and cognitive delay in children. Against this background, we analyzed the contribution of iodized salt to total iodine and salt intake in Germany and compared the results with data from Switzerland.
Analyses were performed with data of the representative German Health-Interview and Examination-Survey for Adults (DEGS1, 2008-2011) using spot urine measurements of creatinine, iodine, and sodium (n = 6738). Median daily iodine and salt intakes were calculated by estimating 24-h iodine and sodium excretions from urinary analyte/creatinine ratios. Linear regressions were used to deduce iodine intake that originates from iodine containing foods (i.e., salt-independent iodine). From this, ingested iodine originating from salt and the proportion of iodized salt to total salt intake were calculated. Data from Switzerland were obtained from the literature.
In Germany, only 42% (52.2 µg/d) of the predicted median total iodine intake (126.2 µg/d), i.e., 12% less than in Switzerland, were found to originate from salt, whereas 73.7 µg/d came from iodine containing foods. 28% (2.6 g/d) of the median salt intake (9.3 g/d) of the German population was calculated to represent iodized salt against 43% in Switzerland.
Along with an almost identical inherent iodine intake in Germany and Switzerland, the average total iodine intake, the contribution of iodized salt to total iodine intake, and the proportion of iodized salt to total salt are higher in Switzerland than in Germany. Despite this, iodine fortification of table salt has recently been increased in Switzerland from 20 to 25 mg/kg to ensure iodine sufficiency in the population, whereas in Germany fortification still remains at a mean level of 20 mg/kg implying a growing risk of increasing iodine deficiency rates if general salt intake drops.
在食盐减钠行动中如果不增加碘强化,那么在已经实施食盐碘化的国家,碘营养状况将恶化。碘供应减少会增加甲状腺肿、甲状腺结节和儿童认知发育迟缓的流行风险。在此背景下,我们分析了碘化食盐对德国碘总摄入量和盐摄入量的贡献,并与瑞士的数据进行了比较。
使用 2008-2011 年德国代表性成人健康访谈和体检调查(DEGS1)的数据进行分析,采用尿肌酐、碘和钠的点尿测量值(n=6738)。通过估算尿分析物/肌酐比值中的 24 小时碘和钠排泄量,计算出每日碘和盐的中位数摄入量。线性回归用于推断来源于含碘食物(即盐独立碘)的碘摄入量。由此,计算出来源于盐的摄入碘和碘化盐占总盐摄入量的比例。瑞士的数据来自文献。
在德国,只有 42%(52.2μg/d)的预测中位数总碘摄入量(126.2μg/d)来源于盐,比瑞士少 12%,而 73.7μg/d 来源于含碘食物。德国人口的中位数盐摄入量(9.3g/d)中有 28%(2.6g/d)被认为是碘化盐,而瑞士则为 43%。
尽管德国和瑞士的固有碘摄入量几乎相同,但瑞士的平均总碘摄入量、碘化盐对总碘摄入量的贡献以及碘化盐对总盐摄入量的比例均高于德国。尽管如此,瑞士最近将食盐的碘强化量从 20mg/kg 增加到 25mg/kg,以确保人群的碘充足,而德国的强化量仍维持在 20mg/kg 的平均水平,这意味着如果普遍的盐摄入量下降,碘缺乏率增加的风险将会增大。