• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于紫锥菊提取物选择和植物化学特征描述的策略,以用于安全性测试。

A strategy for test article selection and phytochemical characterization of Echinacea purpurea extract for safety testing.

机构信息

Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Battelle, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Mar;137:111125. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111125. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2020.111125
PMID:31931071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7079738/
Abstract

Botanical dietary supplements (BDS) are used around the world for many purported therapeutic properties. The selection of an authentic product and it's phytochemical characterization is critical to generate robust safety data. Because botanicals are complex mixtures with variable quality, identification of a representative product for testing has been challenging. Echinacea is used for its purported immune stimulant properties and was listed as the 2nd top-selling BDS in 2018. However, there are limited safety data for Echinacea. Hence, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) has selected Echinacea for safety testing using rodent models. Here, we describe selection and comprehensive characterization of an Echinacea purpurea root extract to be used in the NTP testing program. Using non-targeted chemical analyses combined with chemometric analysis, a potential unfinished product (i.e., an extract that serves as source material for finished products) of Echinacea purpurea was selected. The product was then authenticated using chemical and DNA techniques and characterized, including the phytochemical composition. Among numerous constituents identified, caftaric acid, chicoric acid, chlorogenic acid and dodeca-2(E),4(E),8(Z),10(E/Z)-tetraenoic acid isobutylamide made up a small fraction of the extract. Based on these analyses, an approach is proposed for test article selection for Echinacea research which can be adapted to other botanicals.

摘要

植物性膳食补充剂(BDS)在全球范围内被用于许多据称的治疗特性。选择真实的产品及其植物化学特征对于生成强大的安全数据至关重要。由于植物是具有可变质量的复杂混合物,因此确定用于测试的代表性产品具有挑战性。紫锥菊因其据称的免疫刺激特性而被使用,并在 2018 年被列为第二大畅销 BDS。然而,紫锥菊的安全性数据有限。因此,国家毒理学计划(NTP)已选择使用啮齿动物模型对紫锥菊进行安全性测试。在这里,我们描述了紫锥菊根提取物的选择和综合特征,以用于 NTP 测试计划。使用非靶向化学分析结合化学计量学分析,选择了一种潜在的未完成产品(即作为成品原料的提取物)。然后使用化学和 DNA 技术对产品进行鉴定和表征,包括植物化学成分。在鉴定的众多成分中,咖啡酸、菊苣酸、绿原酸和十二烷-2(E),4(E),8(Z),10(E / Z)-四烯酸异丁酰胺构成了提取物的一小部分。基于这些分析,提出了一种用于紫锥菊研究的测试品选择方法,该方法可以适应其他植物。

相似文献

1
A strategy for test article selection and phytochemical characterization of Echinacea purpurea extract for safety testing.一种用于紫锥菊提取物选择和植物化学特征描述的策略,以用于安全性测试。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Mar;137:111125. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111125. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
2
Effect of high pressure pasteurization on bacterial load and bioactivity of Echinacea purpurea.高压巴氏灭菌对紫锥菊细菌负荷和生物活性的影响。
J Food Sci. 2010 Sep;75(7):C613-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01753.x.
3
Absolute/relative bioavailability and metabolism of dodeca-2E,4E,8Z,10E/Z-tetraenoic acid isobutylamides (tetraenes) after intravenous and oral single doses to rats.十二碳-2E,4E,8Z,10E/Z-四烯酸异丁酰胺(四烯)经静脉注射和口服单次给药后在大鼠体内的绝对/相对生物利用度和代谢。
Planta Med. 2011 Nov;77(16):1794-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1271120. Epub 2011 May 20.
4
Mast cell degranulation and calcium influx are inhibited by an Echinacea purpurea extract and the alkylamide dodeca-2E,4E-dienoic acid isobutylamide.紫锥菊提取物和十二碳-2E,4E-二烯酸异丁酰胺抑制肥大细胞脱颗粒和钙内流。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2018 Feb 15;212:166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
5
Re-opening the stage for Echinacea research - Characterization of phylloxanthobilins as a novel anti-oxidative compound class in Echinacea purpurea.重新开启紫锥菊研究的舞台——鉴定松果菊属叶黄素类化合物为紫锥菊中一种新型抗氧化化合物。
Phytomedicine. 2019 Jul;60:152969. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.152969. Epub 2019 May 22.
6
Working with the natural complexity: Selection and characterization of black cohosh root extract for use in toxicology testing.研究天然复杂性:毒理学测试中黑升麻根提取物的选择和特征描述。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Feb;160:112769. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112769. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
7
GC-MS analysis of the lipophilic principles of Echinacea purpurea and evaluation of cucumber mosaic cucumovirus infection.紫锥菊亲脂性成分的气相色谱-质谱联用分析及黄瓜花叶黄瓜病毒感染评估
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2002 Aug 1;29(6):1053-60. doi: 10.1016/s0731-7085(02)00146-2.
8
Comparison of alkylamide yield in ethanolic extracts prepared from fresh versus dry Echinacea purpurea utilizing HPLC-ESI-MS.利用高效液相色谱-电喷雾电离质谱法比较新鲜与干燥紫锥菊乙醇提取物中烷基酰胺的产量。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2009 Jul 12;49(5):1141-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.02.011. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
9
Evaluating Sufficient Similarity of Botanical Dietary Supplements: Combining Chemical and In Vitro Biological Data.评估植物性膳食补充剂的充分相似性:结合化学和体外生物学数据。
Toxicol Sci. 2019 Dec 1;172(2):316-329. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz189.
10
Comparative metabolomics approach coupled with cell- and gene-based assays for species classification and anti-inflammatory bioactivity validation of Echinacea plants.比较代谢组学方法结合细胞和基因检测用于拟南芥属植物的物种分类和抗炎生物活性验证。
J Nutr Biochem. 2010 Nov;21(11):1045-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Piriformospora indica culture filtrate and cell extract induce chicoric acid production in Echinacea purpurea hairy roots.印度梨形孢培养滤液和细胞提取物诱导紫锥菊毛状根中菊苣酸的产生。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0323961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323961. eCollection 2025.
2
Herbal Immunostimulants and Their Phytochemicals: Exploring , , and .草药免疫刺激剂及其植物化学成分:探索、、和。 (原文中“Exploring”后三个逗号处内容缺失,无法准确完整翻译)
Plants (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;14(6):897. doi: 10.3390/plants14060897.
3
Integrating DNA Barcoding Within an Orthogonal Approach for Herbal Product Authentication: A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Sufficient Similarity of Botanical Dietary Supplements: Combining Chemical and In Vitro Biological Data.评估植物性膳食补充剂的充分相似性:结合化学和体外生物学数据。
Toxicol Sci. 2019 Dec 1;172(2):316-329. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz189.
2
Exploring DNA quantity and quality from raw materials to botanical extracts.探索从原材料到植物提取物的DNA数量和质量。
Heliyon. 2019 Jun 15;5(6):e01935. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01935. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Selection and characterization of botanical natural products for research studies: a NaPDI center recommended approach.
将DNA条形码整合到草药产品鉴定的正交方法中:一篇叙述性综述。
Phytochem Anal. 2025 Jan;36(1):7-29. doi: 10.1002/pca.3466. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
4
Advancing botanical safety: A strategy for selecting, sourcing, and characterizing botanicals for developing toxicological tools.推进植物安全性:为开发毒理学工具选择、采购和鉴定植物原料的策略。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2024 Apr;186:114537. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2024.114537. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
5
Polyphenolic Characterization and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of In Vitro Digested Extracts of L. Plant Parts in an Inflammatory Model of Human Colon Cells.植物各部位体外消化物的多酚组成分析及其对人结肠细胞炎症模型的抗炎作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 1;25(3):1744. doi: 10.3390/ijms25031744.
6
Quality Consistency of Herbal Products: Chemical Evaluation.中药材质量一致性:化学评价。
Prog Chem Org Nat Prod. 2023;122:163-219. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-26768-0_2.
7
Structural Analysis and Classification of Low-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Comparison between Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning.采用近红外光谱对低分子量透明质酸进行结构分析和分类:传统机器学习与深度学习的比较。
Molecules. 2023 Jan 13;28(2):809. doi: 10.3390/molecules28020809.
8
(L.) Moench: Biological and Pharmacological Properties. A Review.(L.)莫恩奇:生物学和药理学特性。综述。
Plants (Basel). 2022 May 5;11(9):1244. doi: 10.3390/plants11091244.
9
The Importance of Reference Materials and Method Validation for Advancing Research on the Health Effects of Dietary Supplements and Other Natural Products.参考材料和方法验证对推进膳食补充剂及其他天然产物健康影响研究的重要性。
Front Nutr. 2021 Dec 14;8:786261. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.786261. eCollection 2021.
10
Working with the natural complexity: Selection and characterization of black cohosh root extract for use in toxicology testing.研究天然复杂性:毒理学测试中黑升麻根提取物的选择和特征描述。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Feb;160:112769. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112769. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
用于研究的植物天然产物的选择和鉴定:NaPDI 中心推荐的方法。
Nat Prod Rep. 2019 Aug 14;36(8):1196-1221. doi: 10.1039/c8np00065d.
4
A multi-detector chromatographic approach for characterization and quantitation of botanical constituents to enable in silico safety assessments.一种用于鉴定和定量植物成分的多检测器色谱方法,以实现计算机辅助安全评估。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018 Aug;410(21):5143-5154. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1163-y. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
5
What's in the box? Authentication of Echinacea herbal products using DNA metabarcoding and HPTLC.盒子里有什么?使用 DNA 条形码和 HPTLC 对紫锥菊草药产品进行鉴定。
Phytomedicine. 2018 May 15;44:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.03.058. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
6
How similar is similar enough? A sufficient similarity case study with Ginkgo biloba extract.何其相似乃尔?银杏叶提取物充分相似案例研究。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Aug;118:328-339. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 9.
7
Getting to the Root of the Matter: Challenges and Recommendations for Assessing the Safety of Botanical Dietary Supplements.追根溯源:评估植物性膳食补充剂安全性的挑战与建议。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;104(3):429-431. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1088. Epub 2018 May 10.
8
Naturally complex: Perspectives and challenges associated with Botanical Dietary Supplement Safety assessment.天然复杂性:与植物性膳食补充剂安全性评估相关的观点和挑战。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Aug;118:963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
Visualization of DNA in highly processed botanical materials.高度加工植物材料中的 DNA 可视化。
Food Chem. 2018 Apr 15;245:1042-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.11.067. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Benefits and Limitations of DNA Barcoding and Metabarcoding in Herbal Product Authentication.DNA 条形码和代谢条形码在草药产品鉴定中的优势和局限性。
Phytochem Anal. 2018 Mar;29(2):123-128. doi: 10.1002/pca.2732. Epub 2017 Sep 14.