Suppr超能文献

两种用于快速检测肠杆菌科中主要碳青霉烯酶的多重免疫层析检测方法的比较。

Comparison of two multiplex immunochromatographic assays for the rapid detection of major carbapenemases in Enterobacterales.

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, National Reference Center for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Jun 1;75(6):1491-1494. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa043.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Two commercially available lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (ICAs) for detection of the major carbapenemases were prospectively assessed for the detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales: RESIST-4 O.K.N.V. (Coris BioConcept) and NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG Biotech).

METHODS

These two assays were performed prospectively on consecutive Enterobacterales suspected of producing a carbapenemase that were referred to the Belgian National Reference Center for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria between March and June 2018. The intensity of the band corresponding to a carbapenemase for each test was compared using ImageJ software.

RESULTS

Of the 161 isolates tested, a carbapenemase was detected in 91 (60 OXA-48-like, 15 VIM, 9 KPC, 5 NDM, 1 IMP and 1 IMP + OXA-48); in the remaining 70, no carbapenemases were detected. For both tests, the results were 100% concordant with the results of the PCR-sequencing reference method. Two IMP producers were only detected by NG-Test CARBA 5 as IMP is not targeted by RESIST-4 O.K.N.V. The mean intensity of the OXA-48, VIM and NDM bands displayed by NG-Test CARBA 5 was 3 to 3.7 times higher than for RESIST-4 O.K.N.V., while the KPC band was on average 1.7 times more intense with RESIST-4 O.K.N.V.

CONCLUSIONS

RESIST-4 O.K.N.V. and NG-Test CARBA 5 are two efficient assays for identification of the major carbapenemases. NG-Test CARBA 5 offers the advantage of detecting IMP, which remains rare in Western countries.

摘要

目的

两种市售的用于检测主要碳青霉烯酶的侧向流动免疫层析检测法(ICAs)用于检测肠杆菌科中的碳青霉烯酶:RESIST-4 O.K.N.V.(Coris BioConcept)和 NG-Test CARBA 5(NG Biotech)。

方法

这两种检测法于 2018 年 3 月至 6 月在连续送检的疑似产生碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌科标本中前瞻性应用,这些标本来自比利时国家监测革兰氏阴性菌中抗菌药物耐药性的参考中心。使用 ImageJ 软件比较每个检测法中对应碳青霉烯酶的条带强度。

结果

在 161 株受试菌株中,有 91 株(60 株 OXA-48 样、15 株 VIM、9 株 KPC、5 株 NDM、1 株 IMP 和 1 株 IMP+OXA-48)检测到碳青霉烯酶;在其余 70 株中,未检测到碳青霉烯酶。两种检测法的结果均与 PCR 测序参考方法的结果完全一致。只有 NG-Test CARBA 5 检测到 2 株 IMP 产生菌,因为 RESIST-4 O.K.N.V. 不针对 IMP。NG-Test CARBA 5 显示的 OXA-48、VIM 和 NDM 条带的平均强度比 RESIST-4 O.K.N.V. 高 3 到 3.7 倍,而 KPC 条带的平均强度比 RESIST-4 O.K.N.V. 高 1.7 倍。

结论

RESIST-4 O.K.N.V. 和 NG-Test CARBA 5 是两种有效的检测主要碳青霉烯酶的方法。NG-Test CARBA 5 的优势在于可以检测到在西方国家仍较为罕见的 IMP。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验