Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Department of Emergency Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Feb 21;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-0989-8.
Many studies have reported the predictive value of the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) in the progression of atherosclerosis and the prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the utility of the AIP for prediction is unknown after PCI among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
2356 patients with T2DM who underwent PCI were enrolled and followed up for 4 years. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCEs), considered to be a combination of cardiogenic death, myocardial infarction, repeated revascularization, and stroke. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-target vessel revascularization (non-TVR). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modelling found that the AIP was correlated with prognosis and verified by multiple models. According to the optimal cut-off point of the ROC curve, the population was divided into high/low-AIP groups. A total of 821 pairs were successfully matched using propensity score matching. Then, survival analysis was performed on both groups.
The overall incidence of MACCEs was 20.50% during a median of 47.50 months of follow-up. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis before matching suggested that the AIP was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of T2DM after PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.528, 95% CI 1.100-2.123, P = 0.011). According to the survival analysis of the matched population, the prognosis of the high AIP group was significantly worse than that of the low AIP group (HR (95% CI) 1.614 (1.303-2.001), P < 0.001), and the difference was mainly caused by repeat revascularization. The low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level did not affect the prognosis of patients with T2DM (P = 0.169), and the effect of the AIP on prognosis was also not affected by LDL-C level (P < 0.001).
The AIP, a comprehensive index of lipid management in patients with T2DM, affects prognosis after PCI. The prognosis of diabetic patients with high levels of the AIP included more MACCEs and was not affected by LDL-C levels. It is recommended to monitor the AIP for lipid management in diabetic patients after PCI and ensure that the AIP is not higher than 0.318. Trial registration This is an observational cohort study that does not involve interventions. So we didn't register. We guarantee that the research is authentic and reliable, and hope that your journal can give us a chance.
许多研究报告了血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)在动脉粥样硬化进展和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)预后中的预测价值。然而,在 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,PCI 后 AIP 的预测效用尚不清楚。
共纳入 2356 例接受 PCI 的 T2DM 患者,并进行了 4 年的随访。主要终点是主要心血管和脑血管不良事件(MACCEs),定义为心源性死亡、心肌梗死、再次血运重建和卒中的组合。次要终点包括全因死亡率、靶血管血运重建(TVR)和非靶血管血运重建(non-TVR)。多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型发现 AIP 与预后相关,并通过多个模型得到验证。根据 ROC 曲线的最佳截断点,将人群分为高/低 AIP 组。使用倾向评分匹配共成功匹配 821 对。然后对两组进行生存分析。
在中位随访 47.50 个月期间,总体 MACCE 发生率为 20.50%。匹配前多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析表明,AIP 是 T2DM 患者 PCI 后预后的独立危险因素(风险比 [HR] 1.528,95%置信区间 1.100-2.123,P=0.011)。根据匹配人群的生存分析,高 AIP 组的预后明显差于低 AIP 组(HR(95%CI)1.614(1.303-2.001),P<0.001),差异主要由再次血运重建引起。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平不影响 T2DM 患者的预后(P=0.169),AIP 对预后的影响也不受 LDL-C 水平的影响(P<0.001)。
AIP 是 T2DM 患者血脂管理的综合指标,影响 PCI 后的预后。AIP 水平较高的糖尿病患者的预后发生更多的 MACCEs,且不受 LDL-C 水平的影响。建议对接受 PCI 的糖尿病患者进行 AIP 监测以进行血脂管理,并确保 AIP 不高于 0.318。
这是一项观察性队列研究,不涉及干预措施。因此,我们没有注册。我们保证研究是真实可靠的,希望您的期刊能给我们一个机会。