• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能算法预测院前急救医疗服务中对重症监护的需求。

Artificial intelligence algorithm to predict the need for critical care in prehospital emergency medical services.

机构信息

Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Research Center, Sejong Medical Research Institute, 20, Gyeyangmunhwa-ro, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

VUNO, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Mar 4;28(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-0713-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13049-020-0713-4
PMID:32131867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7057604/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In emergency medical services (EMSs), accurately predicting the severity of a patient's medical condition is important for the early identification of those who are vulnerable and at high-risk. In this study, we developed and validated an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm based on deep learning to predict the need for critical care during EMS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observation cohort study. The algorithm was established using development data from the Korean national emergency department information system, which were collected during visits in real time from 151 emergency departments (EDs). We validated the algorithm using EMS run sheets from two EDs. The study subjects comprised adult patients who visited EDs. The endpoint was critical care, and we used age, sex, chief complaint, symptom onset to arrival time, trauma, and initial vital signs as the predicted variables.

RESULTS

The number of patients in the development data was 8,981,181, and the validation data comprised 2604 EMS run sheets from two hospitals. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the algorithm to predict the critical care was 0.867 (95% confidence interval, [0.864-0.871]). This result outperformed the Emergency Severity Index (0.839 [0.831-0.846]), Korean Triage and Acuity System (0.824 [0.815-0.832]), National Early Warning Score (0.741 [0.734-0.748]), and Modified Early Warning Score (0.696 [0.691-0.699]).

CONCLUSIONS

The AI algorithm accurately predicted the need for the critical care of patients using information during EMS and outperformed the conventional triage tools and early warning scores.

摘要

背景

在紧急医疗服务(EMS)中,准确预测患者的病情严重程度对于早期识别那些脆弱和高风险的患者至关重要。在这项研究中,我们开发并验证了一种基于深度学习的人工智能(AI)算法,用于预测 EMS 期间需要重症监护的情况。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究。该算法是使用来自韩国国家急诊信息系统的开发数据建立的,这些数据是从 151 个急诊科(ED)实时采集的。我们使用来自两家 ED 的 EMS 运行表验证了该算法。研究对象包括成年患者,他们曾到 ED 就诊。终点是重症监护,我们使用年龄、性别、主诉、症状发作至到达时间、创伤和初始生命体征作为预测变量。

结果

开发数据中的患者数量为 8981181 人,验证数据包括来自两家医院的 2604 份 EMS 运行表。该算法预测重症监护的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.867(95%置信区间[0.864-0.871])。这一结果优于紧急严重程度指数(0.839 [0.831-0.846])、韩国分诊和紧急度系统(0.824 [0.815-0.832])、国家早期预警评分(0.741 [0.734-0.748])和改良早期预警评分(0.696 [0.691-0.699])。

结论

该 AI 算法使用 EMS 期间的信息准确预测了患者需要重症监护的情况,并且优于传统的分诊工具和早期预警评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/451c/7057604/8e3f62ee6740/13049_2020_713_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/451c/7057604/47f4dc693b66/13049_2020_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/451c/7057604/42557c3a89bf/13049_2020_713_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/451c/7057604/8e3f62ee6740/13049_2020_713_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/451c/7057604/47f4dc693b66/13049_2020_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/451c/7057604/42557c3a89bf/13049_2020_713_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/451c/7057604/8e3f62ee6740/13049_2020_713_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence algorithm to predict the need for critical care in prehospital emergency medical services.人工智能算法预测院前急救医疗服务中对重症监护的需求。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Mar 4;28(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-0713-4.
2
Deep Learning Algorithm to Predict Need for Critical Care in Pediatric Emergency Departments.深度学习算法预测儿科急诊需要重症监护
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e988-e994. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001858.
3
Validation of deep-learning-based triage and acuity score using a large national dataset.基于深度学习的分诊和严重程度评分的验证:使用大型国家数据集。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 15;13(10):e0205836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205836. eCollection 2018.
4
An Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Trauma Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study.一种用于预测韩国急诊科创伤患者死亡率的人工智能模型:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 29;25:e49283. doi: 10.2196/49283.
5
Prehospital Application of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale by Emergency Medical Services.紧急医疗服务机构对加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表的院前应用 。 (注:这里“acuity”结合语境可能是指“急症程度”之类的意思,但按照要求未做额外解释,直接保留原文词汇)
CJEM. 2017 Jan;19(1):26-31. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.345. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
6
Development of a field artificial intelligence triage tool: Confidence in the prediction of shock, transfusion, and definitive surgical therapy in patients with truncal gunshot wounds.开发一种现场人工智能分诊工具:预测躯干枪伤患者休克、输血和确定性外科治疗的信心。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jun 1;90(6):1054-1060. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003155.
7
A Gradient Boosting Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Mortality in the Emergency Department Triage: Devising a Nine-Point Triage Score.一种用于预测急诊科分诊早期死亡率的梯度提升机器学习模型:设计九点分诊评分。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):220-227. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05512-7. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
Recognizing critically ill children with a modified pediatric early warning score at the emergency department, a feasibility study.在急诊科使用改良儿科早期预警评分识别危重症患儿的可行性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;178(2):229-234. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3285-9. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
9
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
10
Prediction of Critical Care Outcome for Adult Patients Presenting to Emergency Department Using Initial Triage Information: An XGBoost Algorithm Analysis.利用初始分诊信息预测急诊科成年患者的重症监护结局:一种XGBoost算法分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Sep 20;9(9):e30770. doi: 10.2196/30770.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Mistriage Based on the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.基于韩国分诊与 acuity 量表的误诊影响因素:一项回顾性横断面研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Sep;57(5):860-873. doi: 10.1111/jnu.70033. Epub 2025 Jul 6.
2
AI-Driven Advances in Parkinson's Disease Neurosurgery: Enhancing Patient Selection, Trial Efficiency, and Therapeutic Outcomes.人工智能驱动的帕金森病神经外科进展:优化患者选择、试验效率及治疗效果
Brain Sci. 2025 May 9;15(5):494. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050494.
3
A meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of artificial intelligence predicting emergency department dispositions.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial intelligence and neural networks in urology: current clinical applications.泌尿外科中的人工智能与神经网络:当前临床应用
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Feb;72(1):49-57. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03613-0. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
2
Deep-learning-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest prognostic system to predict clinical outcomes.基于深度学习的院外心脏骤停预后系统,用于预测临床结局。
Resuscitation. 2019 Jun;139:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
Pre-hospital qSOFA as a predictor of sepsis and mortality.
人工智能预测急诊科处置情况诊断测试准确性的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 May 15;25(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03010-x.
4
Improving prediction accuracy of hospital arrival vital signs using a multi-output machine learning model: a retrospective study of JSAS-registry data.使用多输出机器学习模型提高医院到达时生命体征的预测准确性:对JSAS登记数据的回顾性研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 May 13;25(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01233-9.
5
Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Emergency Medicine Triage - A Systematic Review.人工智能和机器学习在急诊医学分诊中的应用——一项系统综述
Med Arch. 2024;78(3):198-206. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2024.78.198-206.
6
AI frontiers in emergency care: the next evolution of nursing interventions.急诊护理中的人工智能前沿:护理干预的下一次演进
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 11;12:1439412. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1439412. eCollection 2024.
7
Improving triage performance in emergency departments using machine learning and natural language processing: a systematic review.利用机器学习和自然语言处理提高急诊科分诊性能的系统评价。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01135-2.
8
The effects of applying artificial intelligence to triage in the emergency department: A systematic review of prospective studies.人工智能在急诊科分诊中的应用效果:前瞻性研究的系统评价
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):105-118. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13024. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
9
Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.利用人工智能支持院前创伤护理:一项范围综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Sep 4;5(5):e13251. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13251. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
The Role of Informatics in Advancing Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Review.信息学在推进急诊医学发展中的作用:全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Jul 6;16(7):e63979. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63979. eCollection 2024 Jul.
院前 qSOFA 作为脓毒症和死亡率的预测指标。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1273-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.025. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
4
Validation of deep-learning-based triage and acuity score using a large national dataset.基于深度学习的分诊和严重程度评分的验证:使用大型国家数据集。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 15;13(10):e0205836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205836. eCollection 2018.
5
The Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: associations with admission, disposition, mortality and length of stay in the emergency department.韩国分诊和 acuity 量表:与急诊科入院、处置、死亡率和住院时间的关系。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Jul 1;31(6):449-455. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy184.
6
An Algorithm Based on Deep Learning for Predicting In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.基于深度学习的院内心脏骤停预测算法。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 26;7(13):e008678. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008678.
7
Accuracy and Reliability of Emergency Department Triage Using the Emergency Severity Index: An International Multicenter Assessment.运用急诊严重指数进行急诊科分诊的准确性和可靠性:一项国际多中心评估。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May;71(5):581-587.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.036. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
8
Prehospital triage of septic patients at the SAMU regulation: Comparison of qSOFA, MRST, MEWS and PRESEP scores.创伤前分诊在 SAMU 调节下的脓毒症患者:qSOFA、MRST、MEWS 和 PRESEP 评分的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 May;36(5):820-824. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.030. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
Clinical Considerations When Applying Vital Signs in Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale.在儿科韩国分诊和 acuity 量表中应用生命体征时的临床注意事项。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Oct;32(10):1702-1707. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1702.
10
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.深度学习算法在视网膜眼底照片糖尿病视网膜病变检测中的开发与验证。
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2402-2410. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17216.