Suppr超能文献

工作心理社会状况评估及其与健康的关系:多研究报告。

The Assessment of Psychosocial Work Conditions and Their Relationship to Well-Being: A Multi-Study Report.

机构信息

Teaching and Research Area for Occupational Health Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 4;17(5):1654. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051654.

Abstract

The aim of this multi-study report is to present a questionnaire that enables researchers and practitioners to assess and evaluate psychosocial risks related to well-being. In Study 1, we conducted a cross-sectional online-survey in 15 German companies from 2016 to 2017 to verify factor- and criterion-related validity. Data consisted of 1151 employee self-ratings. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in an eight-factor structure (CFI = 0.902, RMSEA = 0.058, and SRMR = 0.070). All scales held to excellent internal consistency values (α = 0.65-0.90) and were related significantly to well-being ( = 0.17-0.35, < 0.001). A second, longitudinal study in 2018 showed satisfying convergent and discriminant validity ( = 293) to scales from KFZA and COPSOQ. Test-retest reliability ( = 73; α = 0.65-0.88, < 0.05) was also good. The instrument provides incremental validity above existing instruments since it explains additional variance in well-being.

摘要

本多研究报告的目的是呈现一个问卷,使研究人员和从业者能够评估和评估与幸福感相关的社会心理风险。在研究 1 中,我们于 2016 年至 2017 年在 15 家德国公司进行了一项横断面在线调查,以验证因子和效标相关性。数据包括 1151 名员工自评。探索性和验证性因素分析得出了一个 8 因素结构(CFI = 0.902,RMSEA = 0.058,SRMR = 0.070)。所有量表的内部一致性值均较高(α = 0.65-0.90),与幸福感显著相关( = 0.17-0.35, < 0.001)。2018 年的第二项纵向研究显示,与 KFZA 和 COPSOQ 的量表具有令人满意的收敛和区分效度( = 293)。重测信度( = 73;α = 0.65-0.88, < 0.05)也很好。该工具提供了额外的有效性,因为它解释了幸福感的额外方差。

相似文献

1
The Assessment of Psychosocial Work Conditions and Their Relationship to Well-Being: A Multi-Study Report.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 4;17(5):1654. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051654.
7
The Japanese Workplace PERMA-Profiler: A validation study among Japanese workers.
J Occup Health. 2018 Sep 26;60(5):383-393. doi: 10.1539/joh.2018-0050-OA. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ): Development, content, reliability and validity.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Jul 1;45(4):356-369. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3793. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
10
FIN-TIERA: A Tool for Assessing Technology Induced Errors.
Methods Inf Med. 2017 Jan 9;56(1):1-12. doi: 10.3414/ME16-01-0097. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
"Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda". Workers' Proactivity in the Association between Emotional Demands and Mental Health.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 9;16(18):3309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183309.
2
Comparability of Self-Ratings and Observer Ratings in Occupational Psychosocial Risk Assessments: Is There Agreement?
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jun 12;2019:8382160. doi: 10.1155/2019/8382160. eCollection 2019.
4
Examples of Holistic Good Practices in Promoting and Protecting Mental Health in the Workplace: Current and Future Challenges.
Saf Health Work. 2015 Dec;6(4):295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
5
Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some Further Observations.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Jan 1;25(1):97-114. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_12.
6
The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature.
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. doi: 10.1159/000376585. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
8
Psychosocial working conditions and psychological well-being among employees in 34 European countries.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014 Nov;87(8):897-907. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0930-0. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
10
Available instruments for measurement of psychosocial factors in the work environment.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Oct;82(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0312-6. Epub 2008 Mar 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验