Teaching and Research Area for Occupational Health Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 4;17(5):1654. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051654.
The aim of this multi-study report is to present a questionnaire that enables researchers and practitioners to assess and evaluate psychosocial risks related to well-being. In Study 1, we conducted a cross-sectional online-survey in 15 German companies from 2016 to 2017 to verify factor- and criterion-related validity. Data consisted of 1151 employee self-ratings. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in an eight-factor structure (CFI = 0.902, RMSEA = 0.058, and SRMR = 0.070). All scales held to excellent internal consistency values (α = 0.65-0.90) and were related significantly to well-being ( = 0.17-0.35, < 0.001). A second, longitudinal study in 2018 showed satisfying convergent and discriminant validity ( = 293) to scales from KFZA and COPSOQ. Test-retest reliability ( = 73; α = 0.65-0.88, < 0.05) was also good. The instrument provides incremental validity above existing instruments since it explains additional variance in well-being.
本多研究报告的目的是呈现一个问卷，使研究人员和从业者能够评估和评估与幸福感相关的社会心理风险。在研究 1 中，我们于 2016 年至 2017 年在 15 家德国公司进行了一项横断面在线调查，以验证因子和效标相关性。数据包括 1151 名员工自评。探索性和验证性因素分析得出了一个 8 因素结构（CFI = 0.902，RMSEA = 0.058，SRMR = 0.070）。所有量表的内部一致性值均较高（α = 0.65-0.90），与幸福感显著相关（ = 0.17-0.35， < 0.001）。2018 年的第二项纵向研究显示，与 KFZA 和 COPSOQ 的量表具有令人满意的收敛和区分效度（ = 293）。重测信度（ = 73；α = 0.65-0.88， < 0.05）也很好。该工具提供了额外的有效性，因为它解释了幸福感的额外方差。
