Suppr超能文献

在东南亚心理健康服务中实施公民参与:当前证据的系统评价与现实主义综合分析

Implementing civic engagement within mental health services in South East Asia: a systematic review and realist synthesis of current evidence.

作者信息

James Karen, Brooks Helen, Susanti Herni, Waddingham Jessica, Irmansyah Irman, Keliat Budi-Anna, Utomo Bagus, Rose Diana, Colucci Erminia, Lovell Karina

机构信息

Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston and St Georges, 6th Floor Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK.

2Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Mar 10;14:17. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00352-z. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Civic engagement (CE) has the potential to transform mental health services and could be particularly important for low and middle-income countries (LMICs), which are rapidly developing to respond to the burden of poor mental health. Research from high income countries has found many challenges associated with the meaningful implementation of CE in practice, but this has been underexplored in LIMCS and in South East Asia (SEA) in particular.

METHODS

We completed a realist synthesis and systematic review of peer reviewed publications and grey literature to identify the context and actions which promote successful implementation of CE approaches in SEA. We used a theory-driven approach-realist synthesis-to analyse data and develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations that can be used to explain how civic engagement approaches operate in South East Asian contexts. We worked closely with patient and public representatives to guide the review from the outset.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven published and unpublished articles were included, 24 were evaluations of CE, including two Randomized Controlled Trials. The majority of CE interventions featured uptake or adaptation of Western models of care. We identified important cultural differences in the enactment of civic engagement in SEA contexts and four mechanisms which, alongside their contextual barriers and facilitators, can be used to explain how civic engagement produces a range of outcomes for people experiencing mental health problems, their families and communities. Our review illustrates how CE interventions can be successfully implemented in SEA, however Western models should be adapted to fit with local cultures and values to promote successful implementation. Barriers to implementation included distrust of services/outside agencies, stigma, paternalistic cultures, limited resource and infrastructure.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide guidance for the implementation of CE approaches within SEA contexts and identify areas for further research. Due to the collectivist nature of many SEA cultures, and the impact of shared traumas on community mental health, CE might best be implemented at community level, with a focus on relational decision making. This review is registered on PROSPERO: CRD42018087841.

摘要

引言

公民参与(CE)有潜力改变心理健康服务,对于中低收入国家(LMICs)可能尤为重要,这些国家正在迅速发展以应对心理健康问题带来的负担。高收入国家的研究发现,在实践中切实实施公民参与存在许多挑战,但在中低收入国家尤其是东南亚(SEA),这方面的探索还不够充分。

方法

我们对同行评审出版物和灰色文献进行了实证综合和系统综述,以确定在东南亚促进成功实施公民参与方法的背景和行动。我们采用理论驱动的方法——实证综合——来分析数据,并构建背景-机制-结果配置,以解释公民参与方法在东南亚背景下是如何运作的。从一开始,我们就与患者和公众代表密切合作以指导综述。

结果

纳入了57篇已发表和未发表的文章,其中24篇是对公民参与的评估,包括两项随机对照试验。大多数公民参与干预措施的特点是采用或改编西方护理模式。我们确定了东南亚背景下公民参与实施过程中的重要文化差异,以及四种机制,连同其背景障碍和促进因素,可用于解释公民参与如何为有心理健康问题的人、他们的家庭和社区产生一系列结果。我们的综述说明了公民参与干预措施如何能在东南亚成功实施,然而西方模式应加以调整以适应当地文化和价值观,以促进成功实施。实施障碍包括对服务/外部机构的不信任、耻辱感、家长式文化、资源和基础设施有限。

结论

我们的研究结果为在东南亚背景下实施公民参与方法提供了指导,并确定了进一步研究的领域。由于许多东南亚文化的集体主义性质,以及共同创伤对社区心理健康的影响,公民参与可能最好在社区层面实施,重点是关系决策。本综述已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册:CRD42018087841。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9f8/7063827/13da835cc840/13033_2020_352_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验