Abtahi Mohsen, Eslami Gilda, Cavallero Serena, Vakili Mahmood, Hosseini Saeedeh Sadat, Ahmadian Salman, Boozhmehrani Mohammad Javad, Khamesipour Ali
Research Center for Food Hygiene and Safety, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Shohadaye Gomnam Blv, Yazd, Iran.
Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Mar 4;13(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-04973-y.
Leishmaniasis is caused by different Leishmania spp. Treatment failure (TF) of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a serious issue that may be due to various reasons, previous studies suggested Leishmania RNA virus (LRV) as a potential cause of TF. Two variant groups of LRV1 and LRV2 are reported. In this study, the presence of LRV1/LRV2 was compared in TF with treatment response (TR) isolates of L. major. Clinical isolates of 15 TF and 15 TR were collected from CL patients referred to the Health Centers of Isfahan. Genomic DNA was extracted to identify Leishmania spp. using ITS1-PCR-RFLP. Identification of LRV1/LRV2 was performed using SYBR Green Real-Time PCR. The statistical analysis to test relationship between the treatment response with Glucantime and the presence of LRV were performed using SPSS 16.0 with Fisher's Exact test. P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
ITS1-PCR-RFLP results showed that every isolate was identified as L. major. The results showed no LRV1 in any of the samples but 7 TR isolates and 2 TF isolates showed positive for LRV2. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the presence of LRV2 and response to Glucantime (p-value = 0.1086). Therefore, other mechanisms might be responsible for TF.
利什曼病由不同的利什曼原虫物种引起。皮肤利什曼病(CL)的治疗失败(TF)是一个严重问题,可能由多种原因导致,先前的研究表明利什曼原虫RNA病毒(LRV)是治疗失败的一个潜在原因。已报道了LRV1和LRV2两个变异组。在本研究中,比较了主要利什曼原虫治疗失败(TF)分离株和治疗有效(TR)分离株中LRV1/LRV2的存在情况。从转诊至伊斯法罕健康中心的CL患者中收集了15例治疗失败和15例治疗有效的临床分离株。提取基因组DNA,使用ITS1-PCR-RFLP鉴定利什曼原虫物种。使用SYBR Green实时PCR鉴定LRV1/LRV2。使用SPSS 16.0和Fisher精确检验对葡糖胺治疗反应与LRV存在之间的关系进行统计分析。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
ITS1-PCR-RFLP结果显示,每个分离株均被鉴定为主要利什曼原虫。结果显示,任何样本中均未检测到LRV1,但7例治疗有效分离株和2例治疗失败分离株LRV2呈阳性。统计分析显示,LRV2的存在与对葡糖胺的反应之间无显著差异(P值 = 0.1086)。因此,其他机制可能是治疗失败的原因。