Maia Teresa Mendes, Staes An, Plasman Kim, Pauwels Jarne, Boucher Katie, Argentini Andrea, Martens Lennart, Montoye Tony, Gevaert Kris, Impens Francis
VIB Center for Medical Biotechnology, Albert Baertsoenkaai 3, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Albert Baertsoenkaai 3, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
ACS Omega. 2020 Mar 17;5(12):6754-6762. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00080. eCollection 2020 Mar 31.
Despite its growing popularity and use, bottom-up proteomics remains a complex analytical methodology. Its general workflow consists of three main steps: sample preparation, liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and computational data analysis. Quality assessment of the different steps and components of this workflow is instrumental to identify technical flaws and avoid loss of precious measurement time and sample material. However, assessment of the extent of sample losses along with the sample preparation protocol, in particular, after proteolytic digestion, is not yet routinely implemented because of the lack of an accurate and straightforward method to quantify peptides. Here, we report on the use of a microfluidic UV/visible spectrophotometer to quantify MS-ready peptides directly in the MS-loading solvent, consuming only 2 μL of sample. We compared the performance of the microfluidic spectrophotometer with a standard device and determined the optimal sample amount for LC-MS/MS analysis on a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer using a dilution series of a commercial K562 cell digest. A careful evaluation of selected LC and MS parameters allowed us to define 3 μg as an optimal peptide amount to be injected into this particular LC-MS/MS system. Finally, using tryptic digests from human HEK293T cells and showing that injecting equal peptide amounts, rather than approximate ones, result in less variable LC-MS/MS and protein quantification data. The obtained quality improvement together with easy implementation of the approach makes it possible to routinely quantify MS-ready peptides as a next step in daily proteomics quality control.
尽管自下而上的蛋白质组学越来越受欢迎且应用广泛,但它仍然是一种复杂的分析方法。其一般工作流程包括三个主要步骤:样品制备、液相色谱-串联质谱联用(LC-MS/MS)以及计算数据分析。对该工作流程中不同步骤和组件的质量评估有助于识别技术缺陷,并避免浪费宝贵的测量时间和样品材料。然而,由于缺乏准确且直接的肽定量方法,目前尚未常规评估样品制备方案(尤其是蛋白水解消化后)过程中的样品损失程度。在此,我们报告了使用微流控紫外/可见分光光度计直接在质谱进样溶剂中对可用于质谱分析的肽进行定量,每次仅消耗2 μL样品。我们将微流控分光光度计与标准设备的性能进行了比较,并使用商业化K562细胞消化物的稀释系列,确定了在Q Exactive HF质谱仪上进行LC-MS/MS分析的最佳样品量。对选定的液相色谱和质谱参数进行仔细评估后,我们确定3 μg为注入该特定LC-MS/MS系统的最佳肽量。最后,使用来自人HEK293T细胞的胰蛋白酶消化物,并表明注入等量而非近似量的肽会使LC-MS/MS和蛋白质定量数据的变异性更小。所获得的质量改进以及该方法的易于实施使得在日常蛋白质组学质量控制中常规定量可用于质谱分析的肽成为可能。