Suppr超能文献

人口统计学、临床和医院相关因素与机器人辅助子宫切除术用于良性指征的关联:一项全国性数据库研究。

Association of demographic, clinical, and hospital-related factors with use of robotic hysterectomy for benign indications: A national database study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2020 Aug;16(4):e2107. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2107. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined the association of patient factors, gynecologic diagnoses, and hospital characteristics with utilization of the robotic approach for benign hysterectomy.

METHODS

We performed cross-sectional study of women (n = 725 050) undergoing hysterectomies in the 2012 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample.

RESULTS

A total of 725 050 women underwent inpatient hysterectomy for benign indications: 70345 (10%) were performed robotically. Women were more likely to receive robotic hysterectomy at teaching hospitals (RR 1.60 [95% CI 1.54-1.66]) after adjustment for other patient factors, gynecologic diagnoses, and hospital characteristics. They were more likely to undergo robotic hysterectomy at large (RR 1.34 [95% CI 1.29-1.39]) and for-profit hospitals (RR 1.16 [95% CI 1.11-1.22]). Women were less likely to undergo robotic hysterectomy if they were rural (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.64-0.72]), African-American (RR 0.78 [95% CI 0.74-0.82]), or publicly insured or uninsured (RR 0.55 [95% CI 0.53-0.57]) women.

CONCLUSION

Significant geographic and hospital-level disparities exist in access to robotic hysterectomy in the United States.

摘要

背景

我们研究了患者因素、妇科诊断和医院特征与机器人辅助良性子宫切除术应用的相关性。

方法

我们对 2012 年至 2014 年全国住院患者样本中 725050 例接受子宫切除术的女性进行了横断面研究。

结果

共有 725050 名女性因良性指征接受住院子宫切除术:其中 70345 例(10%)采用机器人辅助。在调整了其他患者因素、妇科诊断和医院特征后,在教学医院(RR 1.60 [95%CI 1.54-1.66])接受机器人子宫切除术的女性更有可能。她们更有可能在大型(RR 1.34 [95%CI 1.29-1.39])和营利性医院(RR 1.16 [95%CI 1.11-1.22])接受机器人子宫切除术。如果女性是农村(RR 0.68 [95%CI 0.64-0.72])、非裔美国人(RR 0.78 [95%CI 0.74-0.82])或公共保险或无保险(RR 0.55 [95%CI 0.53-0.57]),则不太可能接受机器人子宫切除术。

结论

在美国,获得机器人子宫切除术的机会存在显著的地域和医院层面的差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Racial Disparities in Minimally Invasive Benign Hysterectomy.微创良性子宫切除术的种族差异
JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00018. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
9
Predictors of the cost of hysterectomy for benign indications.良性指征子宫切除术的费用预测因素。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb;50(2):101936. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101936. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

7
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hysterectomy Route for Benign Conditions.良性疾病子宫切除术途径的种族和社会经济差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Aug;5(4):758-765. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0420-7. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验