Mediteknology s.r.l. (CNR spin-off company), Via Arnesano, 73100, Lecce, Italy.
CNR NANOTEC, Institute of Nanotechnology, Via Monteroni, 73100, Lecce, Italy.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2020 Jul;412(17):4009-4022. doi: 10.1007/s00216-020-02554-3. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
The chemical analysis of cannabis potency involves the qualitative and quantitative determination of the main phytocannabinoids: Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ-THC), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), etc. Although it might appear as a trivial analysis, it is rather a tricky task. Phytocannabinoids are present mostly as carboxylated species at the aromatic ring of the resorcinyl moiety. Their decarboxylation caused by heat leads to a greater analytical variability due to both reaction kinetics and possible decomposition. Moreover, the instability of cannabinoids and the variability in the sample preparation, extraction, and analysis, as well as the presence of isomeric forms of cannabinoids, complicates the scenario. A critical evaluation of the different analytical methods proposed in the literature points out that each of them has inherent limitations. The present review outlines all the possible pitfalls that can be encountered during the analysis of these compounds and aims to be a valuable help for the analytical chemist. Graphical abstract.
Δ-四氢大麻酚(Δ-THC)、大麻二酚(CBD)、大麻萜酚(CBG)、大麻色烯(CBC)等。虽然这似乎是一项微不足道的分析,但实际上是一项棘手的任务。植物大麻素主要以芳香环上的羧酸化形式存在于间苯二酚部分。由于热导致的脱羧作用会导致分析变异性更大,这是由于反应动力学和可能的分解。此外,大麻素的不稳定性以及样品制备、提取和分析的可变性,以及大麻素的同系物形式的存在,使情况更加复杂。对文献中提出的不同分析方法的批判性评估指出,它们各自都存在固有局限性。本综述概述了在分析这些化合物时可能遇到的所有可能的陷阱,并旨在为分析化学家提供有价值的帮助。