• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

给药方式对艾滋病医学结局研究健康评级和欧洲五维健康量表得分的影响。

The effect of mode of administration on medical outcomes study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS.

作者信息

Wu A W, Jacobson D L, Berzon R A, Revicki D A, van der Horst C, Fichtenbaum C J, Saag M S, Lynn L, Hardy D, Feinberg J

机构信息

School of Hygiene and Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 1997 Jan;6(1):3-10. doi: 10.1023/a:1026471020698.

DOI:10.1023/a:1026471020698
PMID:9062436
Abstract

Brief measures of health-related quality of life are being used with increased frequency in AIDS clinical trials. Self-administration of questionnaires can reduce costs in this setting because they require little time. However, the equivalence between self- and interview-administered responses in clinical trials is not known. We evaluated patient and proxy responses to the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) and the EuroQol. We randomized 68 patients with advanced HIV disease on (1) mode of administration (self vs. interview); (2) type of interview (face-to-face vs. telephone); (3) questionnaire order (MOS-first vs. EuroQol-first); and (4) 2- vs. 3-item response categories for physical limitations. There were few differences in scores between self and interview administration and type of interview. Proxy respondents viewed patients as more impaired than did patients themselves on subjective aspects of health including mental health (63.8 vs. 75.7, p < 0.001), health distress (67.3 vs. 77.1, p = 0.007), pain (64.4 vs. 70.0, p = 0.04), and vitality (48.4 vs. 55.5, p = 0.04). Results concerning questionnaire order and number of response categories were not conclusive. Our results suggest that for patients with advanced HIV disease, data from the MOS-HIV and the EuroQol collected using different modes may be pooled, but that proxy responses should be calibrated.

摘要

在艾滋病临床试验中,与健康相关的生活质量简短测量方法的使用频率越来越高。在这种情况下,问卷的自我管理可以降低成本,因为它们所需时间很少。然而,临床试验中自我管理和访谈管理的回答之间的等效性尚不清楚。我们评估了患者及其代理人对医学结局研究艾滋病毒健康调查(MOS-HIV)和欧洲生活质量五维度问卷(EuroQol)的回答。我们将68例晚期艾滋病毒疾病患者随机分为:(1)管理方式(自我管理与访谈管理);(2)访谈类型(面对面访谈与电话访谈);(3)问卷顺序(先填MOS-HIV问卷与先填EuroQol问卷);以及(4)身体功能受限的2项与3项回答类别。自我管理和访谈管理以及访谈类型之间的得分差异很小。在包括心理健康(63.8对75.7,p<0.001)、健康困扰(67.3对77.1,p = 0.007)、疼痛(64.4对70.0,p = 0.04)和活力(48.4对55.5,p = 0.04)在内的健康主观方面,代理人受访者认为患者的受损程度比患者自己认为的更严重。关于问卷顺序和回答类别数量的结果尚无定论。我们的结果表明,对于晚期艾滋病毒疾病患者,使用不同方式收集的MOS-HIV和EuroQol数据可以合并,但代理人的回答应进行校准。

相似文献

1
The effect of mode of administration on medical outcomes study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS.给药方式对艾滋病医学结局研究健康评级和欧洲五维健康量表得分的影响。
Qual Life Res. 1997 Jan;6(1):3-10. doi: 10.1023/a:1026471020698.
2
Interviewer versus self-administered health-related quality of life questionnaires - does it matter?访谈式与自我管理式健康相关生活质量问卷 - 有区别吗?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 10;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-30.
3
Quality of life among people living with HIV/AIDS in northern Thailand: MOS-HIV Health Survey.泰国北部艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者的生活质量:MOS-HIV健康调查。
Qual Life Res. 2004 Apr;13(3):601-10. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000021319.73865.5a.
4
Randomised controlled comparison of the Health Survey Short Form (SF-12) and the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) in telephone interviews versus self-administered questionnaires. Are the results equivalent?在电话访谈与自行填写问卷两种方式下,健康调查简表(SF - 12)与慢性疼痛分级量表(GCPS)的随机对照比较。结果是否等效?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Nov 22;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-50.
5
An equivalence study: Are patient-completed and telephone interview equivalent modes of administration for the EuroQol survey?一项等效性研究:患者自行完成的欧洲五维健康量表调查与电话访谈式调查是否为等效的施测方式?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jan 23;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0596-x.
6
The influence of place of administration on health-related quality-of-life assessments: findings from the Veterans Health Study.给药地点对健康相关生活质量评估的影响:退伍军人健康研究的结果
J Ambul Care Manage. 2005 Apr-Jun;28(2):111-24. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200504000-00003.
7
A randomized study comparing instruments for measuring health-related quality of life in HIV-infected patients. Spanish MOS-HIV and MQOL-HIV Validation Group. Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey.一项比较用于测量HIV感染患者健康相关生活质量的工具的随机研究。西班牙MOS-HIV和MQOL-HIV验证组。医学结局研究HIV健康调查。
AIDS. 1999 Sep 10;13(13):1727-35. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199909100-00017.
8
Validation of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey as a measure of quality of life in HIV-infected patients in Singapore.验证医学结局研究HIV健康调查作为新加坡HIV感染患者生活质量衡量指标的有效性。
Int J STD AIDS. 2002 Jul;13(7):456-61. doi: 10.1258/09564620260079608.
9
A comparative review of health-related quality-of-life measures for use in HIV/AIDS clinical trials.用于艾滋病临床试验的健康相关生活质量测量方法的比较综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(8):751-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624080-00003.
10
Validity and responsiveness of the euroqol as a measure of health-related quality of life in people enrolled in an AIDS clinical trial.作为衡量参与艾滋病临床试验人群健康相关生活质量的工具,欧洲五维度健康量表的效度和反应度
Qual Life Res. 2002 May;11(3):273-82. doi: 10.1023/a:1015240103565.

引用本文的文献

1
Resilience and quality of life in patients who underwent mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19, one year after discharge: a cross-sectional study.COVID-19 患者机械通气后 1 年的韧性和生活质量:一项横断面研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 12;8(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00748-2.
2
Are in Person and Telephone Interviews Equivalent Modes of Administrating the CAT, the FACIT-FS and the SGRQ in People With COPD?对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,面对面访谈和电话访谈在实施慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)、功能性慢性疾病治疗功能评估-疲劳量表(FACIT-FS)和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)时是等效的方式吗?
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Oct 25;2:729190. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.729190. eCollection 2021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring depression in the community: a comparison of telephone and personal interviews.在社区中测量抑郁症:电话访谈与个人访谈的比较
Public Opin Q. 1982 Spring;46(1):110-21. doi: 10.1086/268703.
2
EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway.欧洲五维度健康量表:与健康相关的生活质量测量。挪威普通公众对健康状态的估值。
Health Policy. 1991 Jun;18(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90141-j.
3
EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.
Burden of visual impairment in mainland China: the Handan Eye Study and Beijing Eye Study.
中国大陆视觉障碍负担:邯郸眼病研究和北京眼病研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;259(11):3501-3509. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05234-9. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
4
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.提高随机试验中保留率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 6;3(3):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub3.
5
Prioritization criteria of patients on scheduled waiting lists for abdominal wall hernia surgery: a cross-sectional study.计划性腹壁疝手术候补患者的优先排序标准:一项横断面研究。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1659-1666. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02378-9. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
Assessing health-related quality of life among patients with peripheral artery disease: A review of the literature and focus on patient-reported outcome measures.评估外周动脉疾病患者的健康相关生活质量:文献回顾及对患者报告结局测量的关注。
Vasc Med. 2021 Jun;26(3):317-325. doi: 10.1177/1358863X20977016. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
7
Feasibility and acceptability of a psychosocial and adherence electronic patient reported outcomes (PROs) system at an HIV care center in southern India.印度南部一家艾滋病护理中心心理社会及依从性电子患者报告结局(PROs)系统的可行性与可接受性
AIDS Care. 2020 May;32(5):630-636. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1668532. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
8
An equivalence study: Are patient-completed and telephone interview equivalent modes of administration for the EuroQol survey?一项等效性研究:患者自行完成的欧洲五维健康量表调查与电话访谈式调查是否为等效的施测方式?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jan 23;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0596-x.
9
Self-administered versus interview-based questionnaires among patients with intermittent claudication: Do they give different results? A cross-sectional study.间歇性跛行患者中自行填写问卷与访谈式问卷:结果是否不同?一项横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2016 Jan-Feb;134(1):63-9. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2015.01733009. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
10
The Relationship between Visual Impairment and Health-Related Quality of Life in Korean Adults: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2008-2012).韩国成年人视力障碍与健康相关生活质量的关系:韩国国家健康与营养检查调查(2008 - 2012年)
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0132779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132779. eCollection 2015.
欧洲生活质量量表——一种衡量健康相关生活质量的新工具。
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
4
Functional status and well-being in a placebo-controlled trial of zidovudine in early symptomatic HIV infection.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988). 1993 May;6(5):452-8.
5
Telephone assessment of depression severity.抑郁症严重程度的电话评估。
J Psychiatr Res. 1993 Jul-Sep;27(3):247-52. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(93)90035-z.
6
Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.通过邮寄与电话访谈收集的SF-36健康调查问卷规范的成本与质量比较:一项全国性调查的结果
Med Care. 1994 Jun;32(6):551-67. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199406000-00002.
7
Predicting future functional status for seriously ill hospitalized adults. The SUPPORT prognostic model.预测重症住院成人患者未来的功能状态。SUPPORT预后模型。
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 1;122(5):342-50. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-5-199503010-00004.
8
Health status and function with zidovudine or zalcitabine as initial therapy for AIDS. A randomized controlled trial. Roche 3300/ACTG 114 Study Group.
JAMA. 1995 Jan 25;273(4):295-301.
9
Change in clinical status, health status, and health utility outcomes in HIV-infected patients.HIV感染患者临床状态、健康状况及健康效用结果的变化。
Med Care. 1995 Apr;33(4 Suppl):AS173-82.
10
Evaluating the quality of life associated with rifabutin prophylaxis for Mycobacterium avium complex in persons with AIDS: combining Q-TWiST and multiattribute utility techniques.
Qual Life Res. 1995 Aug;4(4):309-18. doi: 10.1007/BF01593883.