• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Hallucinations in posttraumatic stress disorder: Insights from predictive coding.创伤后应激障碍中的幻觉:预测编码的见解。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Aug;129(6):534-543. doi: 10.1037/abn0000531. Epub 2020 May 21.
2
Testing models of post-traumatic intrusions, trauma-related beliefs, hallucinations, and delusions in a first episode psychosis sample.在首发精神病样本中测试创伤后侵入、创伤相关信念、幻觉和妄想的模型。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Jun;58(2):154-172. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12206. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
Psychotic symptoms in post-traumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍中的精神病性症状。
Mil Med. 1999 Jan;164(1):73-5.
4
[Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a consequence of the interaction between an individual genetic susceptibility, a traumatogenic event and a social context].[创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)作为个体遗传易感性、创伤性事件和社会环境之间相互作用的结果]
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
5
[Hallucinations and borderline personality disorder: a review].[幻觉与边缘型人格障碍:综述]
Encephale. 2014 Dec;40(6):431-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
6
Psychotic features in chronic posttraumatic stress disorder and schizophrenia: comparative severity.慢性创伤后应激障碍和精神分裂症中的精神病性特征:严重程度比较
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000 Apr;188(4):217-21. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200004000-00004.
7
The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis.精神病的预测编码理论。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 1;84(9):634-643. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 25.
8
[Post-traumatic stress disorder in reaction to psychotic experience: A systematic revue].[对精神病性体验的反应性创伤后应激障碍:一项系统综述]
Encephale. 2019 Dec;45(6):506-512. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
9
Intrusive memories of hallucinations and delusions in traumatized intensive care patients: An interview study.创伤后重症监护患者幻觉和妄想的侵入性记忆:一项访谈研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Sep;20(3):613-31. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12109. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
10
The association between traumatic experience, paranoia and hallucinations: a test of the predictions of psychological models.创伤经历、妄想症与幻觉之间的关联:对心理学模型预测的检验
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Oct;116(4):280-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01011.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Exaggerated perception of change with greater sensory imprecision.随着感觉不精确性增加,对变化的感知被夸大。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 11;15(1):29415. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14791-6.
2
Biomarkers of Auditory-Verbal Hallucinations.听觉言语幻觉的生物标志物。
Adv Neurobiol. 2024;40:665-681. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_22.
3
Visual hallucinations in psychosis: What do people actually see?精神病中的视幻觉:人们实际看到了什么?
Psychol Psychother. 2025 Mar;98(1):58-73. doi: 10.1111/papt.12553. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
RDoC Framework Through the Lens of Predictive Processing: Focusing on Cognitive Systems Domain.基于预测处理视角的研究领域标准(RDoC)框架:聚焦认知系统领域
Comput Psychiatr. 2024 Oct 30;8(1):178-201. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.119. eCollection 2024.
5
Active Inference in Psychology and Psychiatry: Progress to Date?心理学与精神病学中的主动推理:迄今取得的进展?
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;26(10):833. doi: 10.3390/e26100833.
6
Temporal stability of Bayesian belief updating in perceptual decision-making.贝叶斯信念更新在知觉决策中的时间稳定性。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6349-6362. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02306-y. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
7
Dissociation, trauma and the experience of visual hallucinations in post-traumatic stress disorder and schizophrenia.解离、创伤与创伤后应激障碍和精神分裂症中的视幻觉体验
BJPsych Open. 2023 Jan 26;9(1):e23. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.3.
8
Testing Bayesian models of belief updating in the context of depressive symptomatology.在抑郁症状学背景下测试信念更新的贝叶斯模型。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023 Jun;32(2):e1946. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1946. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
9
How childhood maltreatment alters perception and cognition - the predictive processing account of borderline personality disorder.童年期虐待如何改变感知和认知——边缘型人格障碍的预测加工理论。
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(14):2899-2916. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002458. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
10
Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC.重新审视 RDoC 的七大支柱。
BMC Med. 2022 Jun 30;20(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02414-0.

本文引用的文献

1
In the Body's Eye: The computational anatomy of interoceptive inference.在身体的眼中:内脏感知推断的计算解剖学。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Sep 13;18(9):e1010490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010490. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
The Predictive Processing Model of EMDR.眼动脱敏再处理疗法的预测性加工模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 4;10:2267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02267. eCollection 2019.
3
Generalised free energy and active inference.广义自由能与主动推理
Biol Cybern. 2019 Dec;113(5-6):495-513. doi: 10.1007/s00422-019-00805-w. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
4
Hallucinations and Strong Priors.幻觉与强烈先验。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Feb;23(2):114-127. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
5
The Anatomy of Inference: Generative Models and Brain Structure.推理的剖析:生成模型与脑结构
Front Comput Neurosci. 2018 Nov 13;12:90. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2018.00090. eCollection 2018.
6
The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis.精神病的预测编码理论。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 1;84(9):634-643. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 25.
7
Human memory reconsolidation: A guiding framework and critical review of the evidence.人类记忆再巩固:指导框架与证据的批判性回顾。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Aug;144(8):797-848. doi: 10.1037/bul0000152. Epub 2018 May 24.
8
Interoceptive inference: From computational neuroscience to clinic.内感受推断:从计算神经科学到临床。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jul;90:174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
9
Planning and navigation as active inference.作为主动推理的规划与导航
Biol Cybern. 2018 Aug;112(4):323-343. doi: 10.1007/s00422-018-0753-2. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Computational Neuropsychology and Bayesian Inference.计算神经心理学与贝叶斯推理
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 23;12:61. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00061. eCollection 2018.

创伤后应激障碍中的幻觉:预测编码的见解。

Hallucinations in posttraumatic stress disorder: Insights from predictive coding.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Aug;129(6):534-543. doi: 10.1037/abn0000531. Epub 2020 May 21.

DOI:10.1037/abn0000531
PMID:32437205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10658640/
Abstract

Although hallucinations are not one of the criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), they are increasingly documented in PTSD. They are noted in the absence of clear delusions, formal thought disorganization, disorganized speech, or behavior, ruling out a comorbid psychotic disorder like schizophrenia as a better explanation for these hallucinations. Hallucinations in both PTSD and schizophrenia share phenomenological features. We propose that hallucinations in PTSD, like those in schizophrenia, might be explained in terms of aberrant predictive coding, specifically the misapplication of strong prior beliefs that vitiate perceptual inference. This approach highlights the broader relationship between trauma and psychosis. Under predictive coding, the nervous system organizes past sensory data into an internal model of the world. Under stress, the brain prioritizes speed over accurate encoding. However, memories for traumatic experiences are typically strongly consolidated, to avoid similar experiences in future. In PTSD, this could lead to a world model comprised of inaccurate but overly precise prior beliefs, that can be triggered by stimuli tangentially related to the index trauma, resulting in hallucinations. Crucially, this evidence accumulation depends upon the relative precision of prior beliefs and sensory evidence (supplied in the form of prediction errors). Our basic argument is that stressful situations induce belief updating, in terms of precise prior beliefs, that are difficult to undo. These unduly precise, trauma-related beliefs then constitute perceptual hypotheses, memories, or narratives that bias subsequent experience. This prior bias may be so severe that sensory evidence is effectively ignored; that is, treated as very imprecise, in relation to prior beliefs. Such an account may lead to cognitive therapies for hallucinations aimed at strong prior beliefs, and the exciting prospect of combining such therapies with drugs that modulate neuroplasticity and enhance the adaptive consolidation of more appropriate priors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

虽然幻觉不是创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的标准之一,但它们在 PTSD 中越来越多地被记录下来。这些幻觉是在没有明确妄想、形式思维紊乱、思维混乱或行为紊乱的情况下出现的,排除了精神分裂症等合并的精神病性障碍可以更好地解释这些幻觉。PTSD 和精神分裂症中的幻觉都具有现象学特征。我们提出,PTSD 中的幻觉,就像精神分裂症中的幻觉一样,可以用异常的预测编码来解释,特别是错误地应用了强烈的先验信念,从而破坏了感知推断。这种方法强调了创伤和精神病之间的更广泛关系。在预测编码中,神经系统将过去的感觉数据组织成一个世界的内部模型。在压力下,大脑优先考虑速度而不是准确的编码。然而,创伤经历的记忆通常是强烈巩固的,以避免未来类似的经历。在 PTSD 中,这可能导致一个由不准确但过于精确的先验信念组成的世界模型,这些信念可以被与索引创伤有间接关系的刺激触发,从而导致幻觉。至关重要的是,这种证据积累取决于先验信念和感觉证据(以预测误差的形式提供)的相对精度。我们的基本论点是,压力情境会导致基于精确先验信念的信念更新,而这种更新很难撤销。这些过度精确的、与创伤相关的信念构成了随后经验的感知假设、记忆或叙述的偏见。这种先验偏见可能非常严重,以至于感觉证据被有效地忽略;也就是说,相对于先验信念,它被视为非常不精确的。这样的解释可能会导致针对幻觉的认知疗法,旨在针对强烈的先验信念,以及令人兴奋的前景,即结合这种疗法与调节神经可塑性和增强更合适先验的适应性巩固的药物。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。