Departments of Electrical Engineering (S.B.) and Radiology (O.G., B.P., R.S., S.N.), Stanford University, James H. Clark Center, 318 Campus Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5450; Department of Radiology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (N.K.).
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2020 May 29;2(3):e190062. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2020190062.
To evaluate interreader agreement in annotating semantic features on preoperative CT images to predict microvascular invasion (MVI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Preoperative, contrast material-enhanced triphasic CT studies from 89 patients (median age, 64 years; age range, 36-85 years; 70 men) who underwent hepatic resection between 2008 and 2017 for a solitary HCC were reviewed. Three radiologists annotated CT images obtained during the arterial and portal venous phases, independently and in consensus, with features associated with MVI reported by other investigators. The assessed factors were the presence or absence of discrete internal arteries, hypoattenuating halo, tumor-liver difference, peritumoral enhancement, and tumor margin. Testing also included previously proposed MVI signatures: radiogenomic venous invasion (RVI) and two-trait predictor of venous invasion (TTPVI), using single-reader and consensus annotations. Cohen (two-reader) and Fleiss (three-reader) κ and the bootstrap method were used to analyze interreader agreement and differences in model performance, respectively.
Of HCCs assessed, 32.6% (29 of 89) had MVI at histopathologic findings. Two-reader agreement, as assessed by pairwise Cohen κ statistics, varied as a function of feature and imaging phase, ranging from 0.02 to 0.6; three-reader Fleiss κ varied from -0.17 to 0.56. For RVI and TTPVI, the best single-reader performance had sensitivity and specificity of 52% and 77% and 67% and 74%, respectively. In consensus, the sensitivity and specificity for the RVI and TTPVI signatures were 59% and 67% and 70% and 62%, respectively.
Interreader variability in semantic feature annotation remains a challenge and affects the reproducibility of predictive models for preoperative detection of MVI in HCC.© RSNA, 2020.
评估在术前 CT 图像上标注语义特征以预测肝细胞癌(HCC)患者微血管侵犯(MVI)的读者间一致性。
回顾性分析 2008 年至 2017 年间行肝切除术治疗单发 HCC 的 89 例患者(中位年龄,64 岁;年龄范围,36-85 岁;70 例男性)的术前、对比增强三期 CT 研究。3 名放射科医生分别独立和共识地对动脉期和门静脉期的 CT 图像进行标注,标注内容与其他研究者报道的 MVI 相关特征一致。评估的因素包括是否存在离散的内部动脉、低衰减晕、肿瘤-肝脏差异、肿瘤周围强化和肿瘤边界。测试还包括以前提出的 MVI 特征:基于单读者和共识标注的放射基因组静脉侵犯(RVI)和静脉侵犯两特征预测因子(TTPVI)。采用 Cohen(双读者)和 Fleiss(三读者)κ和 bootstrap 方法分析读者间一致性和模型性能的差异。
在评估的 HCC 中,32.6%(29/89)在组织病理学检查中存在 MVI。通过配对 Cohen κ 统计,双读者一致性因特征和成像阶段而异,范围为 0.02 至 0.6;三读者 Fleiss κ 为-0.17 至 0.56。对于 RVI 和 TTPVI,最佳单读者性能的敏感性和特异性分别为 52%和 77%,67%和 74%。在共识中,RVI 和 TTPVI 特征的敏感性和特异性分别为 59%和 67%,70%和 62%。
在术前检测 HCC 中 MVI 的语义特征标注方面,读者间的变异性仍然是一个挑战,这会影响预测模型的可重复性。© RSNA,2020。