Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
JAMA. 2020 Sep 1;324(9):859-870. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14348.
In the US, states enacted nonpharmaceutical interventions, including school closure, to reduce the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). All 50 states closed schools in March 2020 despite uncertainty if school closure would be effective.
To determine if school closure and its timing were associated with decreased COVID-19 incidence and mortality.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: US population-based observational study conducted between March 9, 2020, and May 7, 2020, using interrupted time series analyses incorporating a lag period to allow for potential policy-associated changes to occur. To isolate the association of school closure with outcomes, state-level nonpharmaceutical interventions and attributes were included in negative binomial regression models. States were examined in quartiles based on state-level COVID-19 cumulative incidence per 100 000 residents at the time of school closure. Models were used to derive the estimated absolute differences between schools that closed and schools that remained open as well as the number of cases and deaths if states had closed schools when the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was in the lowest quartile compared with the highest quartile.
Closure of primary and secondary schools.
COVID-19 daily incidence and mortality per 100 000 residents.
COVID-19 cumulative incidence in states at the time of school closure ranged from 0 to 14.75 cases per 100 000 population. School closure was associated with a significant decline in the incidence of COVID-19 (adjusted relative change per week, -62% [95% CI, -71% to -49%]) and mortality (adjusted relative change per week, -58% [95% CI, -68% to -46%]). Both of these associations were largest in states with low cumulative incidence of COVID-19 at the time of school closure. For example, states with the lowest incidence of COVID-19 had a -72% (95% CI, -79% to -62%) relative change in incidence compared with -49% (95% CI, -62% to -33%) for those states with the highest cumulative incidence. In a model derived from this analysis, it was estimated that closing schools when the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was in the lowest quartile compared with the highest quartile was associated with 128.7 fewer cases per 100 000 population over 26 days and with 1.5 fewer deaths per 100 000 population over 16 days.
Between March 9, 2020, and May 7, 2020, school closure in the US was temporally associated with decreased COVID-19 incidence and mortality; states that closed schools earlier, when cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was low, had the largest relative reduction in incidence and mortality. However, it remains possible that some of the reduction may have been related to other concurrent nonpharmaceutical interventions.
在美国,各州采取了非药物干预措施,包括学校关闭,以减少 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的传播。尽管不确定学校关闭是否有效,但所有 50 个州都在 2020 年 3 月关闭了学校。
确定学校关闭及其时间是否与 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率的降低有关。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国进行的基于人群的观察性研究,于 2020 年 3 月 9 日至 2020 年 5 月 7 日之间进行,采用了中断时间序列分析,包括一个潜伏期,以便政策相关变化发生。为了将学校关闭与结果联系起来,在负二项回归模型中纳入了州级非药物干预措施和属性。根据学校关闭时每 10 万居民累计 COVID-19 发病率的四分位数,检查各州。这些模型用于得出如果各州在 COVID-19 累计发病率处于最低四分位数时关闭学校,与处于最高四分位数时相比,关闭学校和开放学校之间的估计绝对差异,以及如果关闭学校,病例和死亡人数将是多少。
小学和中学关闭。
每 100000 名居民的 COVID-19 每日发病率和死亡率。
学校关闭时各州的 COVID-19 累计发病率从 0 到每 100000 人口 14.75 例不等。学校关闭与 COVID-19 发病率的显著下降(每周调整后的相对变化,-62%[95%置信区间,-71%至-49%])和死亡率(每周调整后的相对变化,-58%[95%置信区间,-68%至-46%])有关。这两个关联在学校关闭时 COVID-19 累计发病率较低的州中最大。例如,在 COVID-19 发病率最低的州,与发病率最高的州相比,发病率的相对变化为-72%(95%置信区间,-79%至-62%),而发病率最低的州为-49%(95%置信区间,-62%至-33%)。在由此分析得出的模型中,据估计,与 COVID-19 累计发病率处于最高四分位相比,在 COVID-19 累计发病率处于最低四分位时关闭学校,将导致每 100000 人口减少 128.7 例,每 100000 人口减少 1.5 例。 16 天内的死亡人数。
2020 年 3 月 9 日至 2020 年 5 月 7 日期间,美国的学校关闭与 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率的降低有关;当 COVID-19 累计发病率较低时,较早关闭学校的州,发病率和死亡率的相对下降幅度最大。然而,仍有可能部分减少与其他同时进行的非药物干预有关。